New study of 300,000 people in Italy proves COVID jab caused gigantic increase in cancer cases
Figure 1 from the study. Click for original. Anything
to the right of the vertical line indicates an increase
cancer diagnoses.
As noted bluntly by Health & Human Services secretary Robert Kennedy, Jr. at a Senate hearing last week, “We were lied to about everything:” A new study of the entire population 11 years and older of a single province in Italy, 300,000 people in total, has now proven that the mRNA COVID jab results in a terrifying and skyrocketing increase in the numbers of cancer cases.
The researchers found that “vaccinated” individuals had far higher hospitalization rates for new cancer diagnoses than the unvaccinated, particularly for breast, bladder, and colorectal cancers. Hospitalizations for cancer were 35% higher in the vaccinated (HR 1.23). The risk spike was strongest among men and those with no prior COVID infection.
- Overall Cancer Risk: +23% after just one dose
- Breast Cancer: +54% increased risk
- Bladder Cancer: +62% increased risk
- Colorectal Cancer: +35% increased risk
The researchers warn that the danger persisted and continued increasing after multiple doses.
In other words, the entire world is now facing a possibly major increase in cancer cases and a significant lowering of life expectancy, because it panicked in 2020 over a respiratory virus comparable to the flu. Those few voices (such as mine) that tried to resist that panic and call for a reasoned response were routinely blacklisted and silenced, and the result is now an impending disaster, on top of the catastrophes we have already suffered due to lockdowns, social distancing, and mask and jab mandates.
Kennedy summed up this situation quite well at that Senate hearing on September, 4, 2025. He was attacked ruthlessly over and over again by Democratic Party senators, only to hit them back twice as hard, noting how they are all in the pay of the pharmaceutical companies that make the jab, bribes totaling millions. He started however with this stark condemnation:
Kennedy at Senate hearing on September 4, 2025
We were lied to about everything. We were lied to about natural immunity. We were told again and again the vaccines would prevent transmission, they’d prevent infection. It wasn’t true. They knew it wasn’t true from the start, because that’s what the animal studies and clinical trials showed.
We were told there was science behind cloth masks. The CDC allowed the teachers’ unions to write the order closing our schools, which hurt working people all over the country. And then pretended it was science based.
…Probably the most famous scientist on ACIP [Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices] was Martin Kulldorff from Harvard, the great world-renowned epidemiologist. He criticized the Covid booster mandates. They ejected him … because he wasn’t in the orthodoxy.
Biden said in August [before he was elected] “I would never take that vaccine, the Trump vaccine.” He came in, he mandated it, and then he fired the two top health officials at FDA who said this thing has not been properly tested.
Kennedy repeatedly made it clear to both sides of the aisle during this hearing that he would not back down, that he intended to clean house at the CDC, that he intended to fire everyone involved in this debacle. He also made it clear that the problem wasn’t just the lying and corruption in connection to the COVID jab, the problem went back decades across the entire government health community, requiring a major and merciless house-cleaning.
To this I say “Amen!” and “Hallelujah!” I hope he succeeds, though so far it seems he has only begun to fight, and has been met with determined opposition.
On Christmas Eve 1968 three Americans became the first humans to visit another world. What they did to celebrate was unexpected and profound, and will be remembered throughout all human history. Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8, Robert Zimmerman's classic history of humanity's first journey to another world, tells that story, and it is now available as both an ebook and an audiobook, both with a foreword by Valerie Anders and a new introduction by Robert Zimmerman.
The print edition can be purchased at Amazon or from any other book seller. If you want an autographed copy the price is $60 for the hardback and $45 for the paperback, plus $8 shipping for each. Go here for purchasing details. The ebook is available everywhere for $5.99 (before discount) at amazon, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. If you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and the author gets a bigger cut much sooner.
The audiobook is also available at all these vendors, and is also free with a 30-day trial membership to Audible.
"Not simply about one mission, [Genesis] is also the history of America's quest for the moon... Zimmerman has done a masterful job of tying disparate events together into a solid account of one of America's greatest human triumphs."--San Antonio Express-News
I personally do not trust just one study.
But I also never liked the simple idea of the COVID vax at all.
Don’t force me to have a medical treatment I do not want.
As soon as the Mrna vax needed a booster they should have given up on it being a real vaccine.
It should have never been used on children.
It should not have been used on low risk people.
It should have been concentrated on the high risk of death patients.
And just because someone dies with COVID does not mean they died because of COVID.
But because of my age I am trying to get checked for every form of cancer I can.
There is something missing in this ongoing conversation about vaccines.
No one is making the distinction between a traditionally manufactured vaccine and an mRNA “vaccine”.
All of a sudden, they are one in the same.
Q: Where do all of these increased cancer numbers come from? The administration of a vaccine? NO.
They come from the administration of an mRNA created and manufactured “vaccine”.
Is it just me?
An mRNA vaccine causing an uptick in cancers that are currently have new treatments under development made using mRNA. Coincidence?
“””Joe
September 9, 2025 at 6:17 pm
An mRNA vaccine causing an uptick in cancers that are currently have new treatments under development made using mRNA. Coincidence?””””
Or selection bias? One study by itself may or may not include all the factors involved.
According to a very detailed study report released in 2024, the vaxx that was tested in trial and approved by the FDA and the vaxx given to the general public were manufactured differently to get the volume needed. Unfortunately the mass produced one, because of the different process included the risk of foreign DNA infecting those who received it. Compounded by testing which provided “options” which could also be manipulated to allow use of the high foreign DNA version.
It ends with two questions:
“Why are mRNA vaccine manufacturers silent on this issue?
Why aren’t the authorities taking action to refute or gain more clarity on the results and concerns raised by independent labs and scientists through their own manufacturer-independent experimental investigations?”
https://dig-deeply.com/2024/03/15/foreign-dna-in-the-mrna-vaccine/
Long read but broken down with links to different parts at the beginning.
Mr. Zimmerman,
The main outcome of the Italian cohort study is unmistakable: COVID-19 vaccination was associated with a marked reduction in all-cause mortality. Compared to unvaccinated individuals, the risk of death was lower by about 52% after one dose (HR ≈ 0.48), 75% after two doses (HR ≈ 0.25), and 82% after three or more doses (HR ≈ 0.18).
While the authors noted a relative increase in hospitalizations for certain cancers in subgroups, the most consistent and statistically robust finding was that vaccination dramatically reduced the overall risk of death in the population.
“The study notes that people who get “vaccinated” tend to be healthier, wealthier, and more likely to seek preventive care.
This is often referred to as the so-called “healthy vaccinee bias.” ”
Wealthier people are also more likely to check out any health concerns they have, which would lead to lower rates of undiagnosed cases in that group.
Bob, you are usually so skeptical of science research. And rightly so!
But stories like this, where the conclusion fits your pre-existing beliefs, you just accept at face value. Why is that? Where has your skepticism gone? Don’t accept anything at face value. Read the actual paper, not some propaganda press piece that purports to summarize it.
Your headline could have read “COVID jab saves lives!” The study reports “Compared with the unvaccinated, those receiving ≥1 dose showed a significantly lower likelihood of all-cause death…” Why don’t you talk about that?
We should be constantly on the alert for “news” that validates our biases. Sometimes, it is too good to be true.
“Some basic fundamentals of the scientific method: Don’t guess, make no assumptions, test by experimentation, and repeat those tests multiple times to confirm your results.” –Bob Zimmerman
The actual paper:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40881928/
Key quotes from its abstract:
“Compared with the unvaccinated, those receiving ≥1 dose showed a significantly lower likelihood of all-cause death, and a slightly higher likelihood of hospitalization for cancer (HR: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.11-1.37).”
“Given that it was not possible to quantify the potential impact of the healthy vaccinee bias and unmeasured confounders, these findings are inevitably preliminary.”
The study also said that 3 or more doses reduced risk of death from all causes by 35%. Interestingly, the cancer death HR was lower for the 3x vaxxed (1.09) than in the 1x vaxxed (1.23).
I went through screening for a clinical trial in 2009-2010 for multiple myeloma. When all this covid panic reporting started, I recognized similarities in their wording and what I heard during my pre-treatment & treatment and decided one clinical trial was enough.
I’m still here and skipped the jab. Many I know have been jabbed multiple times. Wonder where this will lead?
Could these German AfD candidates who mysteriously have all become dead just before a significant election all just be victims of the jab? Maybe in the spirit of the radical Left up is down, Left is Right, black is white these are all “lucky” people?
1: 1.44 BILLION CHANCE? WHO ARE THESE POLITICAL POWER BALL WINNERS?
I wrote about this very statistically highly unusual event that just went on in the German political process related specifically only to the more Conservative AfD political candidates who are considered “Extreme” by the current government (Read: EU / Globalist and “progressive” in nature).
Dr. John Campbell who in my experience is an Objective observer and reporter of facts and real-world data related to science, healthcare and the Covid jab: https://youtu.be/ZmXjgXw0XKE?si=bl6S8jI7jkp6Vs7d
He received the jab early on, and then he educated himself about what it in fact is.
“Details from Main Sources. The deaths have unfolded in NRW, where the AfD fielded over 3,000 candidates for the September 14 local elections. Authorities maintain no connections between the cases, attributing them to natural or personal causes without third-party involvement. Here’s a factual breakdown based on available reports:
Ralph Lange, age 66 or 67, location unspecified in NRW: Sudden and unexpected death, ruled natural causes.
Wolfgang Seitz, age 59, location unspecified: Sudden death, official cause natural.
Wolfgang Klinger, age 71 or 72, location unspecified: Unexpected natural causes.
Stefan Berendes, age not detailed (likely mid-50s to 60s based on patterns), location unspecified: Sudden death, natural.
René Herford, age not specified, reserve candidate: Died of kidney failure following a pre-existing liver condition.
Patrick Tietze, age not specified, reserve: Reported suicide.
Hans-Joachim Kind, age 80, from Kremenholl in southern Remscheid: Natural causes after a long illness.
These span from late August to early September 2025, with the initial four announced around September 1, followed by two reserves and the seventh shortly after. While some involved older individuals or known health issues, counters highlight that several—like Seitz at 59—were not elderly or previously ill, defying easy dismissal as routine.”
https://nationalfile.com/afd-candidate-deaths-germany-elections-data-09-05-2025/
The flooding of the EU with radical rape gang Islam, the flooding of America with drug gang illegals and it is ALL being forced paid for by the tax payers by their insurgent politically empowered Globalist aligned radical “progressive” Leftists who seek to through sheer numbers take over the political process in order to possess political power and control in perpetutity.
And the NUMBER ONE essential strategic goal? Destroy and hollow out the American Constitution! MUST!
By any means necessary means exactly that.
What is a few million people succumbing to an experimental “vaccine”?
In the grand scheme of politics and political power and control, NOTHING.
Steve Golson: To me the most convincing aspect of this paper is its size and completeness. It covered an entire province, and 300,000 people. And yes, it showed some positive aspects related to the jab, but none to my mind that outweigh the negatives, which to me remain horrifying.
I think the desire to discredit these results largely comes from the natural and completely understandable desire of people who have gotten the jab to rationalize away their fear of what might happen to them because of it.
Finally, note that these results are not found in just this one study. I have reported numerous other studies that found similar negative consequences from the jab, while doing practically nothing to protect anyone from COVID, a flu-like virus that, like the flu, is really only a threat to the chronically ill and the aged.
Anecdotally, it’s been reported that some people who had cancer and were considered cured or in remission had their cancer recur in a hyper-proliferated state after receiving the mRNA vaccine. This entire cohort was excluded from the study.
This just happened an hour ago. In Utah? Unbelievable.
https://twitter.com/_geopolitic_/status/1965851790714482943?s=46
Charlie Kirk shot.
Already praying for him but it does not look good.
Dead
Prayers for the family. He did good works.
Just a friendly reminder that almost every democrat in America injected the Covid experimental liquid. Cheers to a better country in their absence.
Bill Gates bragged that a successful shot would lower the population in a Ted talk, is to be arrested on site in several countries and I think Japan just added him to the list.
His release of flying syringes (mosquitoes) gave Utah “West Nile virus”. The recent release of his mosquitoes has/is spreading other diseases.
He brags how profitable his pharmaceutical company has been. Much better than his computer company. His start up pharmaceutical has never produced a product before the pandemic (plandemic… Watch the movie)
Here’s Jesse Ventura in conspiracy theory (2009) talking about what was going to happen in the future with forced vaccinations. (corny, that went viral recently) dr. interviewed at the 35 minute mark.
https://archive.org/details/2009-dec-30-conspiracy-theory-jesse-ventura-secret-societies-the-bilderbergs-global-death-plot
The recent Senate hearings revealed that the shots were neither safe nor affective. Look it up, the Democrats gave their tired talking points with great faith and no evidence. The other side had a large panel of world-famous doctors with thousands of pages of studies, peer reviewed journals, personal stories of hundreds of patients, all contradicting the Democrats who are taking money from Pfizer.
The shots, tested on gulf war soldiers (gulf war illness, look it up) created by DARPA as a biological warfare agent.
The New and improved Ingredients were given to the pharmaceuticals for mixing (public private partnership in operation warp speed) but the publicly declared testing was all fake or exaggerated. (well proven by there own documents and whistle blowers) Even the double blind study used a “bad vaccine” as a placebo to make the shot look better. Yes people died, but that was the point and they didn’t care.
That’s why there was no insert of side effects in the box, no one had an idea what It would do. On the website “check my batch” you could type in the batch number where they kept track of the shots that cause illness or death. (my family received an in active vaccine, it wasn’t one of the unfortunate lottery winners)
The emergency authorization for corona MRNA vaccine and 500 other experimental genetic altering vaccines has expired. Pharmacies cannot afford the liability and will no longer give it out. Still available in hospitals? Clinics? Still no “side effect insert” with the genetic modification drug. (at least to my knowledge, nothing comes up on the Internet yet, against federal law)
A recent genetic study reveal changes in children’s genetic make up. Lots of mutations they’ve never seen before. (The ovaries are unusually affected by the shot)
Everyone I personally know regret taking the shots because of their new health problems… The ones that are still alive anyway. Half of the people I work with have disappeared, we’re hiring 60 more people to replace them.
There is no cure for mad cow disease (dementia) which is occurring at an all time record numbers to the useless eaters.
Then there’s the turbo cancers, The DNA of SV40 came back positive in the tests! Infection in people with a compromised immune system always causes cancer…
Another ticking time bomb that once injected, stays with you for the rest of your life.
https://vaxopedia.org/2024/04/28/did-they-put-sv40-in-covid-vaccines/
A Signal in the Noise?
Mr. Golson sounds like a professional skeptic, cf, The Skeptical Inquirer (Where inquiring minds DON’T want to know and are terrified of the idea that there might indeed be things that they would prefer not to exist).
One tactic of the professional skeptic is to point out that since *no* study that might refute their own beliefs is “perfect” either in its methodology or the possibility of error (statistical significance), it can be rejected in a kind of infinite regress. Thus, since *every* study that might confirm the dangers associated with the mRNA vaccines is subject to possible errors of some kind, NONE of them can be relied upon as evidential. QED, there is no “reliable evidence” supporting anything that they don’t care for. And there never can be.
On the other hand, if one looks at the sheer *number* of such studies — good, bad, and indifferent, and with all the associated possible errors therein — then a *trend* clearly emerges, and it would be foolhardy (as the skeptics want us to be) to ignore the pattern that we are seeing. And, while a pattern may not be “proof” that something exists, it at least suggests some kind of relationship / correlation is there that might warrant further investigation.
More succinctly, for the professional skeptic, NO amount of evidence, of however good quality will *ever* suffice to disprove their own beliefs, and it is simply futile to argue with them. Recalling the old adage about arguing with a pig, it’s a waste of time, and it only serves to irritate them.
It’s “Slay News”, if you hover the link. They’ve posted a lot of sensational dreck over the years.
Bob: “To me the most convincing aspect of this paper is its size and completeness.”
And yet you accept and discuss only the results you agree with.
Bob: “I think the desire to discredit these results…”
I’m not discrediting these results. I’m quite happy to accept the results of this study, both good and bad.
You, on the other hand, are behaving like the mainstream propaganda press you so often rail against. You are cherry-picking out only the results you want to believe. And you are discrediting the most prominent result reported by this research!
Quoting from the paper:
“a significantly lower likelihood of all-cause death”
“a slightly higher likelihood of hospitalization for cancer”
Tell me, which is more likely?
Be a skeptic, Bob. About everything, always. They might be wrong. You might be wrong. And I certainly could be wrong.
https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/the-evening-pause/knowledge-or-certainty/
Steve Golson: At what point did you think I ain’t skeptical? Just because find this study’s results concerning does not mean I have abandoned my own ability to think critically.
And really, that the study made a point to emphasize how it found “a lower likelihood of all-cause” death is absurd and completely irrelevant. Do you know anyone who would take the jab for general health reasons? Would you? Of course not. People take it to prevent COVID, but it fails to do that one fundamental job. And as it fails in that one job, it causes an increase in cancer.
Not a good trade in my mind.
Robert Zimmerman,
You wrote: “… [the jab] doing practically nothing to protect anyone from COVID …”
We have a perfect example of just how well the jab worked to protect against the Wuhan flu: Joe Biden. He famously kept up with his booster shots, wore masks, did everything to protect against the Wuhan flu, and he was perhaps the most protected person on the planet. During his four years as president, he only got Wuhan twice. That is all, only twice. We don’t know how often he got the regular flu in the years prior to that, but I suspect it was very rarely.
It is hard to know what would have happened had Biden not been jabbed over and over again and again, but I suspect he would have contracted Wuhan flu a whopping couple of times, or maybe once; it is hard to tell with counterfactuals.
We could compare his experience with Wuhan with your own, Robert. You were completely unprotected by a team of people making sure that you didn’t come in contact with anyone with the virus, and I think you reported contracting the disease one time (or was it some other ailment?). And since you refused to wear those protective masks, which also guaranteed we all would remain disease-free, I think this comparison tells us much about how well the jab, the masks, and total avoidance of contact with infected people worked.
My own county may be another source of knowledge. My county required those who had been jabbed to wear masks in order to prevent the spread of Wuhan flu to those who had not been jabbed. The jab worked so well that it allowed the spread of the disease. Joe Biden may not have been a source of the spread of Wuhan flu, but others who had been jabbed were.
The next time we have another global pandemic panic, we all would do well to remember the lesson that Joe Biden’s experience taught us about these radical new protective measures that we took with the Wuhan flu. Economic and societal destruction; using the entire population as an uncontrolled experimental group for an untried (and never approved) radical new vaccine method; tyrannical control over the population’s behavior, expression, and dress; disruption of voting methodology into ways that the New York Times reported could be easily made fraudulent; keeping the least vulnerable demographic out of school for years; and sending ailing patients into groups of the most vulnerable of the most vulnerable demographic proved to be entirely successful, with five times as many deaths reported as had been the predicted number, in April of 2020 (200 thousand), if we all had merely washed our hands more often.
________________
Steve Golson asked: “Quoting from the paper:
“‘a significantly lower likelihood of all-cause death’
“‘a slightly higher likelihood of hospitalization for cancer’
“Tell me, which is more likely?”
The former seems more unlikely, as it seems unlikely that one faux vaccine is a cure all. So I vote that the latter is more likely.
Determining cause and effect is difficult, and there are many ways that two completely unrelated things can seem related if you merely look at correlations:
http://www.tylervigen.com/spurious-correlations
This is a huge problem in science and medicine. How do we know for sure that any pharmaceutical does then intended job? We do tests with placeboes and control groups, but that only gives us correlations, not certainty. Robert is not wrong when he points out the uncertainty of science.
Edward: During the COVID panic in 2020 and most of 2021, I never wore a mask, never social distanced, continued to do everything I always had done (going caving once a month with others and no masks). I also attended ham club meetings, where everyone gathered in a restaurant (no masks) and socialized like normal.
In other words, I broke every stupid rule imposed by governments. I did not get COVID.
Finally, in late November 2021, just after the caving community blacklisted me for not getting COVID and refusing to follow their stupid rules (wear a mask while caving), I came down with it. We think I got it from Diane, who got it when she visited a doctors office (wearing a mask). Her case was very mild. Mine was more severe.
When I was better my doc tested me, and found I had a super duper level of immunity in the future.
The whole Wuhan panic was a great example of mass hysteria. It is a shame Americans allowed themselves to be conned.
Agreed–I never wore a mask either.
Speaking of masks:
https://phys.org/news/2025-09-masks-microplastics-chemicals-people-environment.html
“A new study led by Coventry University investigated how many microplastics and chemical additives can be released from different types of disposable face masks, such as surgical masks and filtering facepieces, which are often used for personal protection in health care settings or areas with poor air quality. The study is published in the journal Environmental Pollution.”
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0269749124005062
It would appear that Kennedy‘s worst fears were justified. Data collected nine years ago and buried because the outcome was the opposite of what they were trying to prove.
https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Siri-Testimony-1.pdf
Here is a dumb down version giving the highlights of a large vaccine study comparing vaccinated children with children who had not received a vaccine.
“For nearly a decade, a groundbreaking study comparing the long-term health of vaccinated and unvaccinated children gathered dust in the files of Henry Ford Health, one of America’s most respected medical institutions. Conducted by Dr. Marcus Zervos, a staunch vaccine proponent and head of infectious disease at Henry Ford, the research was intended to silence critics by proving vaccines were safe. Instead, it uncovered devastating evidence that vaccinated children faced far higher rates of chronic illnesses — findings so explosive that researchers refused to publish them, fearing professional and institutional backlash.“
Asthma: Vaccinated children were 4.29 times more likely to develop asthma.
Neurodevelopmental disorders (including speech delays): 5.53 times higher in vaccinated children.
Autoimmune diseases: 4.79 times more prevalent in the vaccinated group.
ADHD, learning disabilities and tics: Zero cases in unvaccinated children; multiple cases in vaccinated children.
Chronic ear infections: 6.63 times more common in vaccinated children.
https://vaccines.news/2025-09-12-study-exposes-alarming-health-risks-vaccinated-children.html
Zimmerman is justified for his lack of trust in big government or big pharma… Greed and human nature will always step over the line in which the results can only be described as evil!
No wonder states, especially Florida, is making it easier to opt out of all vaccines.
The gaslighting continues
https://phys.org/news/2025-09-people-political-health-disinformation.html
But admit you just can’t talk AT people any more
https://phys.org/news/2025-09-science-communication-conversation-script.html
Dr. John Campbell reviewed 3 papers listing excess deaths or increased cancer rates after the Wuhan-virus vaccine injections.
This from Japan – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXoZRUCfsQE
The study showed a significant increase in excess deaths after multiple vaxes, n=18,000,000.
This an Italian study (n=296,000), increased deaths-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dnIGqUlluc
This from a Korean paper – (increased cancer rates, n=8.4M).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayfRq-CPF6I
Greens don’t even want you to have inhalers
https://phys.org/news/2025-10-inhalers-carbon-emissions-equivalent-cars.html