To read this post please scroll down.

 

Please forgive this pleading appeal. I am now doing my annual February fund-raising campaign for Behind the Black to celebrate my 73rd birthday. Your support, by donating or subscription, will allow me to continue this work as long as I am able. And I don't want to stop anytime soon.

 

And I do provide unique value. Fifteen years ago I said NASA's SLS rocket was garbage and should be cancelled. Almost a decade ago I said its Orion capsule was a lie and a bad idea. As early as 1998, long before almost anyone else, I predicted in my first book, Genesis: The Story of Apollo 8, that private enterprise and freedom would conquer the solar system, not government. And while everyone else in the media still thinks Mars has no water, I have been reporting the real results from the orbiters now for more than five years, that Mars is in fact a planet largely covered with ice.

 

I could continue with numerous other examples. If you want to know what others will discover a decade hence, read what I write here at Behind the Black. And if you read my most recent book, Conscious Choice, you will find out what is going to happen in space in the next century.

 

Nor am I making this up. My overall track record bears it out.

 

So please consider donating or subscribing to Behind the Black, either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are five ways of doing so:

 

1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.

 

2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation. Takes about a 10% cut.

 

3. A Paypal Donation or subscription, which takes about a 15% cut:

 

4. Donate by check. I get whatever you donate. Make the check payable to Robert Zimmerman and mail it to

 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.


NASA to return SLS to assembly building tomorrow Wednesday

UPDATE: Due to weather, the roll back to the VAB is now delayed until Wednesday, February 25, 2026.

Original post:
————————
According to its most recent update, NASA is now planning on rolling its SLS rocket back to the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB) no sooner than tomorrow, February 24, 2026, in order to begin its investigation into the helium flow issue in the rocket’s upper stage that has now delayed any launch until April at the earliest.

Returning to the Vehicle Assembly Building at Kennedy is required to determine the cause of the issue and fix it.

Teams are reviewing the exact time to begin the approximately 4 mile, multi-hour trek. The quick work to begin preparations for rolling the rocket and spacecraft back to the VAB potentially preserves the April launch window, pending the outcome of data findings, repair efforts, and how the schedule comes to fruition in the coming days and weeks.

The present launch window closes on April 6, 2026. For a launch to occur, NASA engineers need to identify and fix the flow issue. They will also need to test it, which suggests they will have to do some form of fueling test once the rocket is returned to the launchpad.

All of this takes time. First we have one week to get back to the VAB. Then at least a full two weeks in the VAB to identify and fix the upper stage. Then another week to roll the rocket back to the launch pad. And then another week to do another fueling test on the launchpad. That brings us to the beginning of April.

In other words, NASA has no time margin at all. If anything takes just a little longer than planned, it will not make the April launch window.

None of this is a surprise. SLS in its first launch attempt in 2022 missed its spring launch window due to similar issues and ended up launching six months later (after more launch scrubs). I predicted it would happen again now. NASA at this moment has not revealed any later launch windows, so we don’t yet know how long a delay to expect if it misses this window. Based on 2022, I suspect the delay would be until the fall.

Genesis cover

On Christmas Eve 1968 three Americans became the first humans to visit another world. What they did to celebrate was unexpected and profound, and will be remembered throughout all human history. Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8, Robert Zimmerman's classic history of humanity's first journey to another world, tells that story, and it is now available as both an ebook and an audiobook, both with a foreword by Valerie Anders and a new introduction by Robert Zimmerman.

 

The print edition can be purchased at Amazon or from any other book seller. If you want an autographed copy the price is $60 for the hardback and $45 for the paperback, plus $8 shipping for each. Go here for purchasing details. The ebook is available everywhere for $5.99 (before discount) at amazon, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. If you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and the author gets a bigger cut much sooner.


The audiobook is also available at all these vendors, and is also free with a 30-day trial membership to Audible.
 

"Not simply about one mission, [Genesis] is also the history of America's quest for the moon... Zimmerman has done a masterful job of tying disparate events together into a solid account of one of America's greatest human triumphs."--San Antonio Express-News

8 comments

  • Chester Peake

    I shocked some fellow space advocates before the launch of the first test flight by saying that I hoped it blew up on the pad, certainly putting it and us out its misery and forcing a rethink. Of course I want this manned flight to succeed!!! However, it is almost guaranteeing that the next words spoken from the lunar surface will be in Mandarin.

  • Dick Eagleson

    Chester Peake,

    I can appreciate your expressed sentiment. Certainly any even approximate repetition of the Artemis 1 delay soap opera anent Artemis 2 would consume a great deal of SLS-Orion’s remaining political capital while providing an opportunity for Starship to put some significant points on the board.

    It is by no means a given – as far too many now assume – that “the next words spoken from the lunar surface will be in Mandarin.” Internal politics in the PRC have been more than a tad turbulent recently. End-stage totalitarianisms are prone to sudden brittle fractures. Even if Xi hangs on for awhile, though, there is the additional X-factor of what he might do about Taiwan – perhaps even sooner than the PRC’s notional schedule for a first manned lunar mission. Should he make such a move and it goes badly the PRC could well lose the ability to essay any lunar missions for years even assuming a sub-optimal outcome of a Taiwan land grab doesn’t bring down the regime entirely.

  • Clark

    “Paging Jeff Wright. Jeff Wright, customer needs assistance in the Copium aisle.”

    I must be missing something. I need a grizzled OldSpacer to explain to me how this isn’t actually a setback, but a wonderful thing for the American Space Program!

  • John

    I’m just here for the SLS pile-on.

    I’d consider rolling to Florida to witness a SLS launch, there are probably only two more opportunities to do that.
    I couldn’t find any launch window availability after 30 April so I asked my new brain, Grok. Grok said it couldn’t find any launch windows after 30 April:

    “As of February 2026, NASA has not published official launch windows for Artemis II in May, June, or July 2026, as the mission’s current target is no earlier than April 2026 following recent delays due to a helium flow issue in the SLS rocket’s upper stage. space.com +2

    If further delays occur, NASA would release updated availability for later months, typically featuring clusters of 4–6 dates per lunar cycle (about every 4 weeks) with daily windows of approximately 120 minutes each. space.com +1

    These are determined by factors like lunar orbital mechanics, spacecraft power/thermal constraints (no eclipses over 90 minutes), and daytime reentry conditions for crew recovery. space.com

    For reference, here are the most recent published windows (subject to change based on mission readiness):

    February 6, 7, 8, 10, 11 Earlier window; now passed due to delays.

    March 6, 7, 8, 9, 11 Next window; likely missed due to rollback for repairs.

    April 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 30 Current target;
    120-minute windows, times vary (e.g., April 1 opens at 6:24 p.m. EDT).”

    Guessing May 1,2,3,4, also. Falcon’s always a reliable option.

  • John: You would have done as well if not better simply searching BtB for this info.

  • Jeff Wright

    Well, I actually want Starship to succeed long term since zealots seem bent on killing not one but two rockets Marshall created that actually took payloads to the Moon. I maintain the perhaps antique belief that some great things also need to be done by nations as nations to promote unity and involvement.

    Had Starship flown to the Moon and SLS never got beyond LEO you would have had a point–but that wasn’t the case. If the best part is no part…then four liquid fuel engines are better than forty.

    There will never be a MSS in orbit. Should Starship have leaking problems in LEO, folks will be about as understanding about that as SLS haters are of current events.

    Hillhouse was right…

  • Nate P

    Jeff Wright: it doesn’t need to be done by the state to be representative of America, promote unity, or get people involved. SpaceX building lunar bases and enabling the settlement of Mars will do all of that in spades. Nice ad hominem, too.

    You write as if Starship development is over. It is not. No matter how much you refuse to understand this, your misunderstanding can’t change reality. Starship will fly to the Moon, the SLS program will end after a tiny handful of launches, and you will be left raging because your ego is far more important to you than real life.

    As for hypothetical leaks, cogent points here are that SpaceX’s rate of improvement is dramatically faster than Boeing’s; Starship is much cheaper than SLS; and there will be many more tests of Starship depots and transferring propellant on orbit than SLS launches, by far. ‘SLS haters’ have dramatically more reason to be critical of the SLS than you have ever had to be critical about Starship, because you insist on ignoring every difference between the rockets, instead preferring rhetoric and chest-thumping about Alabama and MSFC. You’ve given yourself no out of this aside from being made to look an ignorant fool.

  • Nate P: I repeat, if I wanted to as inarticulate as Jeff Wright, I would point out that Falcon Heavy put a Tesla a lot farther out then SLS flew Orion, and thus proved without doubt that Falcon Heavy is better than SLS.

    But that kind of stupid argument makes no sense, and nonsensical arguments make my brain hurt.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *