Conscious Choice cover

From the press release: In this ground-breaking new history of early America, historian Robert Zimmerman not only exposes the lie behind The New York Times 1619 Project that falsely claims slavery is central to the history of the United States, he also provides profound lessons about the nature of human societies, lessons important for Americans today as well as for all future settlers on Mars and elsewhere in space.

 
Conscious Choice: The origins of slavery in America and why it matters today and for our future in outer space, is a riveting page-turning story that documents how slavery slowly became pervasive in the southern British colonies of North America, colonies founded by a people and culture that not only did not allow slavery but in every way were hostile to the practice.  
Conscious Choice does more however. In telling the tragic history of the Virginia colony and the rise of slavery there, Zimmerman lays out the proper path for creating healthy societies in places like the Moon and Mars.

 

“Zimmerman’s ground-breaking history provides every future generation the basic framework for establishing new societies on other worlds. We would be wise to heed what he says.” —Robert Zubrin, founder of founder of the Mars Society.

 

Available everywhere for $3.99 (before discount) at Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and all ebook vendors, or direct from the ebook publisher, ebookit. And if you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and I get a bigger cut much sooner.


Astra successfully completes first orbital launch

Screen capture 12 seconds after liftoff
Screen capture 12 seconds after liftoff.

Capitalism in space: Astra tonight successfully launched a dummy payload into low Earth orbit. This was their first success after four tries.

The company now joins Rocket Lab and Virgin Orbit as the three operational smallsat rocket launch providers.

The leaders in the 2021 launch race:

41 China
25 SpaceX
18 Russia
5 Europe (Arianespace)

China’s lead over the U.S. in the national rankings has now narrowed to 41 to 40. For the U.S. the 40 launches so far this year ties the entire total from all of last year. With about six weeks left in the year, the U.S. is likely to add a good number of launches to this total. If the total tops 50, it will be first time since the mid-1960s that the U.S. has done that.

The total number of successful launches this year is presently 107. There is an excellent chance the total will exceed 120, a number last seen routinely during the 1970s and 1980s. The highest total ever was 132 in 1975. There is a slim chance that can be beat this year, but if not, I would expect it will be easily eclipsed next year.

Readers!
 

I must unfortunately ask you for your financial support because I do not depend on ads and rely entirely on the generosity of readers to keep Behind the Black running. You can either make a one time donation for whatever amount you wish, or you sign up for a monthly subscription ranging from $2 to $15 through Paypal or $3 to $50 through Patreon.


Your support will allow me to continue covering science and culture as I have for the past twenty years, independent and free from any outside influence.


Your support is even more essential to me because I not only keep this site free from advertisements, I do not use the corrupt social media companies like Google, Twitter, and Facebook to promote my work. I depend wholly on the direct support of my readers.


You can provide that support to Behind The Black with a contribution via Patreon or PayPal. To use Patreon, go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation. For PayPal click one of the following buttons:
 


 

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:


 

If Patreon or Paypal don't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
 

Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652
 

Or you can donate by using Zelle through your bank. You will need to give my name and email address (found at the bottom of the "About" page). The best part of this electronic option is that no fees will be deducted! What you donate will be what I receive.

8 comments

  • Questioner

    Is there any information about the quality of the orbit reached? If we refer to a ground track graph that was shown during the live broadcast, there was a small deviation from the wanted direction.

  • Jeff Wright

    Oh well.

  • V-Man

    Congrats to Astra! The more the merrier.

    (And Blue Origin *still* hasn’t put anything into orbit… Where are my engines, Jeff?)

  • Col Beausabre

    Bezos “Engines? Engines ?! We don’t need no stinkin’ engines !! I’m the richest man in the world without any stinkin’ engines !!”

    BTW, Consumer Reports just published its annual survey of automobile reliability and Tesla was Number 27 out of 28. Its Model 3 was its highest rate rated model and came out “average” while the Model X came in at 5 out of 100 points. See what happens when the boss takes his eye off the ball? Sure hope SpaceX is doing better (so far yes, but….).

  • Chris Lopes

    The fact that this minor league company can do what Blue Origin can’t should embarrass Bezos to no end. Yes sending Captain Kirk into space was cool, but you still need a real space program to compete in the new space era.

  • John E Bowen

    I watched part of the broadcast (on Youtube). One thing that struck me, apropos of capitalism, was that the “Mission Control” team looked lean and mean. I wasn’t there, of course, but it seemed like around 10 people. They also had a few shots of the manufacturing and other staff back in, I think, Alameda, but they weren’t more than a hundred, give or take. They may be ramping up, but even so, small and nimble seems a good description, and I hope they find their market niche.

  • Questioner

    The current design used by Astra for its small launch vehicle “Rocket 3.3” is – as I have already said here – extremely unusual or strange in one respect. And that is the ratio of the mass of the first to the second rocket stage. Usually this value is between 3: 1 and maybe 6: 1. But here it is 27: 1. This means that the upper stage is extremely small in terms of the launch mass of the entire rocket. This can’t be optimal in terms of performance, I would be interested in the reasons for this design.

    Such an extreme relationship I saw the last time with the rocket “Juno I (Jupiter C)”, which was a quickly put together solution (by Wernher von Braun) to get the first American satellite into orbit as quickly as possible.

    Comment: I assumed that the ratio of the stage masses corresponds to the ratio of their propellant masses, which I determined from the available data for thrust and burn time. I estimated the specific impulses according to other engines of this class. The data are: ground thrust of the first stage: 140.2 kN, vacuum thrust of the second stage: 3.3 kN / burning time of the first stage: 180 seconds, burning time of the second stage: 334 seconds / assumed specific impulses for 1st stage (on the ground): 280 s ; second stage (vacuum): 330 s.This results in a propellant mass flow of 51.0 kg / s for the first stage and 1.02 kg / s for the second stage. The first stage therefore consumes: 9.184 kg of propellant and the second stage only: 340 kg.

  • Questioner

    Here a now a complete summary of the technical data of Astra’s “Rocket 3.3” that I reconstructed after the few open known details and especially after the mission video:

    Launch mass of the total rocket: 11,021 kg

    1st stage:
    Ground thrust: 140,200 N / vacuum thrust: 155,300 N (total for five engines)
    Specific Impulse: 280 seconds (ground), 316 seconds (vacuum);
    Propellant mass flow: 51.0 kg / s; Burn time: 180 seconds
    Propellant mass: 9.384 kg (including 100 kg residuals at cut-off assumed and 100 kg consumed before lift-off)
    Dry mass of the stage (including stage adapter): 1,100 kg;
    Ratio of empty to propellant mass: 0.117

    2nd stage:
    Vacuum thrust: 3,296 N, spec. Impulse (vacuum): 330 seconds; Propellant mass flow: 1.02 kg / s; Burn time: 334 seconds
    Propellant mass: 350 kg (including 10 kg residuals at cut-off)
    Mass of 2nd stage + payload at orbit insertion: 137 kg
    Dry mass of the stage: 77 kg
    Ratio of empty to propellant mass: 0.221 (fits to a pressure-fed design)

    Weight of the payload fairing: 60 kg
    Payload mass: 50 kg

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *