Scroll down to read this post.


I am now running my annual July fund-raising campaign to celebrate the twelfth anniversary of the establishment of Behind the Black. For many reasons, mostly political but partly ethical, I do not use Google, Facebook, Twitter. These companies practice corrupt business policies, while targeting conservative websites for censoring, facts repeatedly confirmed by news stories and by my sense that Facebook has taken action to prevent my readers from recommending Behind the Black to their friends.


Thus, I must have your direct support to keep this webpage alive. Not only does the money pay the bills, it gives me the freedom to speak honestly about science and culture, instead of being forced to write it as others demand.


Please consider donating by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar below.


Regular readers can support Behind The Black with a contribution via paypal:

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:

If Paypal doesn't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652


You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above. And if you buy the books through the ebookit links, I get a larger cut and I get it sooner.

Commemorating the victims in Colorado.

Commemorating the victims in Colorado.

I don’t normally report on these violent events. However, I think Malkin’s point here is valid. Too much press has been given the mass murderer in this crime, and not enough for his innocent victims. And in order to understand the truly evil nature of this crime, it is important to know the kind of people this horrible man calmly killed. For example, “6-year-old Veronica Moser identified as Aurora shooting victim; mom in critical condition.”

Conscious Choice cover

From the press release: In this ground-breaking new history of early America, historian Robert Zimmerman not only exposes the lie behind The New York Times 1619 Project that falsely claims slavery is central to the history of the United States, he also provides profound lessons about the nature of human societies, lessons important for Americans today as well as for all future settlers on Mars and elsewhere in space.

Conscious Choice: The origins of slavery in America and why it matters today and for our future in outer space, is a riveting page-turning story that documents how slavery slowly became pervasive in the southern British colonies of North America, colonies founded by a people and culture that not only did not allow slavery but in every way were hostile to the practice.  
Conscious Choice does more however. In telling the tragic history of the Virginia colony and the rise of slavery there, Zimmerman lays out the proper path for creating healthy societies in places like the Moon and Mars.


“Zimmerman’s ground-breaking history provides every future generation the basic framework for establishing new societies on other worlds. We would be wise to heed what he says.” —Robert Zubrin, founder of founder of the Mars Society.


Available everywhere for $3.99 (before discount) at Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and all ebook vendors, or direct from the ebook publisher, ebookit. And if you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and I get a bigger cut much sooner.


  • JGL

    This is an email I sent to friends this morning related to this situation, its titled: When will Hollywood be held accountable?

    I pulled the story segment below from a story on James Holmes, the brilliant PHD student who went way off the deep end, it appears to

    suggest that he knew he had mental problems and was studying the condition, possibly to either better understand and control it or cure it.

    This in conjunction with the alleged quotes from his mother that “they have the right guy” and “I have to get to Colorado” suggest that his

    condition was a known situation within his family, Just like the long time mentally ill Jarred L. that shot Gabby Giffords and killed several


    So IMO this horrific event is more of an issue of mental health and what family members, educational institutions and the general public can

    or might do related to an individual who displays disturbing pathology.

    Holmes could have just as easily made a couple of devices and tossed them into the crowded theater if he just wanted to do damage and

    cause death.

    But he didn’t, it appears that he was fulfilling some kind of sick model he created in his head.

    Where did he get the model he was fulfilling?

    When will Hollywood be confronted on the violent movies they produce, when will Rappers be confronted on the violent culture and

    disrespect for women that they promote?

    These seem to be the images that are the models mentally ill people feel they must fulfill, issues with the second amendment seem

    secondary to me.

    Can we agree that in many of these incidents its Hollywood and the people involved with creating our cultural imagery who appears to

    support all of the liberal and now socialist agendas related to gun control that look more “guilty” by producing and promoting the imagery?

    I hear no one demanding that Hollywood and Rappers end their assault on America with their imagery and lyrics and end their promoting of

    the missuse of fire arms and the assault on the second amendment.

    It looks like they do it as a part of the fulfilling of an agenda to me, if not consciously then subconsciously, and we know that subconsciously

    is unlikely .

    Why do they get a pass?

    Now we are talking about the First Amendment, but where is the outrage in the country and the communities who suffer from these apparent


    The conclusion?

    Personal responsibility, something that is discouraged by the liberal media and the liberal politicians who benefit from the lack of it.

    “Holmes enrolled last year in a neuroscience Ph.D. program at the University of Colorado-Denver but was in the process of withdrawing, said school officials, who didn’t provide a reason. The school later said in a statement that he left the program in June 2012.
    As part of the advanced program in Denver, a James Holmes had been listed as making a presentation in May about Micro DNA Biomarkers in a class named “Biological Basis of Psychiatric and Neurological Disorders.”

  • Kelly Starks

    I wouldn’t jump on this as a conspiracy to promote a agenda – more just not questioning their agenda driven assumptions.
    I noticed that bulk of news reports quoted that the shooter in the Aurora theater had full body armor, but that didn’t make sense attacking unarmed movie goers in “gun free zone” theater (always dangerous places to go), so I did some quick searches. Only one new source (Fox News’ Jana Winter) actually followed up and talked to the manufacturer.

    Winter interviewed Chad Weinman, CEO of, who admitted the shooter’s vest came from their mail order company. But it wasn’t body armor – it was a nylon vest with the velcro pockets and such. Now I can understand why panicked folks in a theater would confuse those – but why didn’t any reporter check on that while trying to fill all the airtime they have on the shootings? Or wonder about a theater chain that braged about being a “gun free zone” but a shooter got a rifle and two pistols into?

  • Kelly Starks

    I don’t think Hollywood images drove this guy. He could have as easily been inspired by comic books or the bible.

    I really wonder about our medical or legal situations if this guy could get this far around the bend without someone seeing he needed to be committed?

  • JGL

    What imagery do you think he was fulfilling?

    What was he dressed as and where did he perpetrate his acts and during what movie?

    He called himself the Joker.

    What do you need his written plan, a schematic and a video?

    The thrust of my point is that Hollywood, the Rapp community, TV, etc, etc. all promote story lines that promote the missuse of fire arms

    and a disrespect for human life.

    Anything goes, there is no restraint, no self editing. ( I am a solid defender of the First Amendment as I am of the Second)

    An example, in New York there is a police program call Stop And Frisk, it goes on in neighborhoods with high incidence of young people

    shooting other young people with ILLEGALLY procured and carried weapons. They casually shoot each other and sometimes innocent


    The communities where this goes on, and keep in mind since this program has been enacted there has been significant reduction in these

    types of incidents. They come to understand that if you carry there is a high likelyhood of being stopped, I would assume.

    What do you think some people and politicians in these communities are screaming about?

    They are concerned with the rights of the people who have been stopped and frisked, as they should be, but I have not heard anyone call out

    the Rappers who promote this particular culture of violence in their videos or lyrics where guns are part of the gear that “men” must carry in

    the street or anyone from Hollywood who produce and profit from such story lines. Total silence.

    They promote Ciroc vodka and Hennessey congnac and movies like Savages very successfully with their imagery, do you think it may also

    apply to violent acts regarding fire arms ?

    And secondly, where is and what can be done when family memebers have an understanding of the mental instability of a family memeber?

    It may be a fine line but it has to be at least discussed.

  • JGL

    Keep on mind I am not saying that Cirroc or Hennessey promote violence in any way, they do not.

  • Kelly Starks

    > What imagery do you think he was fulfilling?..

    Whatever he had at hand that worked for him. Theres lots of choices in the world. Its not like he would have stayed home and read a good book otherwise.

  • JGL

    You have an interesting way of interpreting reality given the, what may be considered evidence regarding this particular event.

    I guess you will have to wait for the movie so its all layed out for you, Im sure Hollywood is working on it as we write.

    Do you see the irony in that?

Readers: the rules for commenting!


No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.


However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.


Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.