Scroll down to read this post.

 

Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. I keep the website clean from pop-ups and annoying demands. Instead, I depend entirely on my readers to support me. Though this means I am sacrificing some income, it also means that I remain entirely independent from outside pressure. By depending solely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, no one can threaten me with censorship. You don't like what I write, you can simply go elsewhere.

 

You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are five ways of doing so:

 

1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.

 

2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
 

3. A Paypal Donation:

4. A Paypal subscription:


5. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above. And if you buy the books through the ebookit links, I get a larger cut and I get it sooner.


NASA wants to know the important technology the commercial space industry needs

Capitalism in space: NASA is now asking the commercial space industry to tell it which of 187 “technology shortfalls” it should give priority to for funding.

The agency has released a list of 187 “technology shortfalls,” or topics where current technology requires additional development to meet NASA’s future needs. The shortfalls are in 20 areas ranging from space transportation and life support to power and thermal management.

Through a website, the agency is inviting people to review the listed technologies and rate their importance through May 13. NASA will use that input to help prioritize those technologies for future investment to bridge the shortfalls.

This decision illustrates well NASA’s effort in the past decade to shift from being the boss which tells the space industry what to do to becoming a servant of that industry. In the past NASA would focus solely on what it considered its needs in deciding what new technology to fund. Often that would result in projects that NASA considered cool, but were dead-ends commercially, never used by anyone.

Now NASA wants to function more like it used to prior to 1957, when it was called the NACA. Then it worked to provide the engineering data that the aviation industry requested. This change is great news, because it means that NASA’s many small technology development contracts will better serve the needs of the industry and its need to make profits, rather the government’s wish list of projects, some of which serve no one’s real need.

Genesis cover

On Christmas Eve 1968 three Americans became the first humans to visit another world. What they did to celebrate was unexpected and profound, and will be remembered throughout all human history. Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8, Robert Zimmerman's classic history of humanity's first journey to another world, tells that story, and it is now available as both an ebook and an audiobook, both with a foreword by Valerie Anders and a new introduction by Robert Zimmerman.

 
The ebook is available everywhere for $5.99 (before discount) at amazon, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. If you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and the author gets a bigger cut much sooner.


The audiobook is also available at all these vendors, and is also free with a 30-day trial membership to Audible.
 

"Not simply about one mission, [Genesis] is also the history of America's quest for the moon... Zimmerman has done a masterful job of tying disparate events together into a solid account of one of America's greatest human triumphs."--San Antonio Express-News

2 comments

  • Col Beausabre

    Bob, your comment about NACA (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics – pronounced En-Ay Sea-Ay, NEVER Knack-Ah). To give just a couple of examples the NACA cowling for radial engines was adopted world wide as were the NACA Series of Airfoils and the “Area Rule” for transonic aircraft which as developed by NACA engineer Richard Whitcomb (saving Convair’s bacon after its XF-102 absolutely refused to exceed the speed of sound in one of the greatest performance short falls in history). He also developed the Whitcomb Body to reduce transonic drag.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NACA_cowling

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NACA_airfoil#Origins

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Area_rule

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-shock_body

  • Edward

    From the linked Space News article:

    The old approach, he said, runs the risk of turning NASA’s space technology program into a “hobby shop,” he said, subject to whims from policymakers. “That’s the wrong focus.”

    SLS, sometimes lovingly called the Senate Launch System, came directly from congressional legislation. It was Congress that insisted that NASA make a superheavy launch vehicle and specified the capacities of three versions, but there was no mission to inform the design. Congress designed the rocket to make sure that Shuttle contractors continued having government contracts — economical efficiency and appropriateness to any mission were not priorities. Thus, NASA acknowledges that there are better ways for it to work than to be a toy for politicians and their staffs. NASA administrators are holding their own revolution, apparently attempting to make NASA useful, again.

    Through this process, people will be able to rate the importance of some or all of the technology shortfalls NASA has identified. They can also list technologies they think should be included or identify those shortfalls that they believe have already been solved.

    Well, it isn’t a perfect step, but it is an important step in the right direction. NACA was useful to help the American aviation industry solve their own problems, but this step helps the American aerospace industry solve NASA’s problems. NACA had important resources and facilities that were too expensive for individual companies to build. One example is large wind tunnels.

    Many startup NewSpace companies have been able to use NASA’s expertise and knowledge to design their own successful vehicles and spacecraft. This has been a great help.

    NASA’s facilities have not been perfect for American industry. Science conducted on ISS is required to become public domain within five years, which limits the ISS’s usefulness for the company that performs that science. Rather than creating proprietary information, they are spending their own money creating public domain information. Hopefully, the commercial space stations will allow companies to keep their own trade secrets to themselves, making it much more profitable to do research in space, greatly increasing the demand for space research. Hopefully, the commercial space stations will allow space manufacturing, which NASA does not let them do now.

    While NASA will not release individual inputs, it does plan to disclose how different stakeholder groups in industry and academia ranked technologies. But Vogel emphasized the public inputs will be just one factor in the overall prioritization.

    Just one factor, out of how many factors? On the other hand, maybe this will not do what we hope it does.

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *