Conscious Choice cover

From the press release: In this ground-breaking new history of early America, historian Robert Zimmerman not only exposes the lie behind The New York Times 1619 Project that falsely claims slavery is central to the history of the United States, he also provides profound lessons about the nature of human societies, lessons important for Americans today as well as for all future settlers on Mars and elsewhere in space.

 
Conscious Choice: The origins of slavery in America and why it matters today and for our future in outer space, is a riveting page-turning story that documents how slavery slowly became pervasive in the southern British colonies of North America, colonies founded by a people and culture that not only did not allow slavery but in every way were hostile to the practice.  
Conscious Choice does more however. In telling the tragic history of the Virginia colony and the rise of slavery there, Zimmerman lays out the proper path for creating healthy societies in places like the Moon and Mars.

 

“Zimmerman’s ground-breaking history provides every future generation the basic framework for establishing new societies on other worlds. We would be wise to heed what he says.” —Robert Zubrin, founder of founder of the Mars Society.

 

Available everywhere for $3.99 (before discount) at Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and all ebook vendors, or direct from the ebook publisher, ebookit. And if you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and I get a bigger cut much sooner.


Russia launches another 36 OneWeb satellites

Capitalism in space: Russia today launched another 36 OneWeb satellites from its Vostochny spaceport using its Soyuz-2 rocket.

This raises the number of OneWeb satellites in orbit to 254.

The leaders in the 2021 launch race:

20 SpaceX
18 China
11 Russia
3 Northrop Grumman

The U.S. remains ahead of China, 29 to 18, in the national rankings.

Readers!
 

Please consider donating to Behind the Black, by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar below. Your support will allow me to continue covering science and culture as I have for the past twenty years, independent and free from any outside influence.


Your support is even more essential to me because I keep this site free from advertisements and do not participate in corrupt social media companies like Google, Twitter, and Facebook. I depend wholly on the direct support of my readers.


You can provide that support to Behind The Black with a contribution via Patreon or PayPal. To use Patreon, go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation. For PayPal click one of the following buttons:
 


 

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:


 

If Patreon or Paypal don't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
 

Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

7 comments

  • I have never been able to figure out how you do these counts.

    America has 29
    SpaceX has 20
    Northrop Grumman has 3

    Where are the other 6?

    Thank you for explaining it to me.

  • Darwin Teague: The leader list is only the LEADERS. There are other American companies that have launches (Rocket Lab, Virgin Orbit, etc) but not enough to make the leader board.

    At the end of the year I will publish a full graph, as I have done every year for the past four. See:

    The state of the global rocket industry in the 21st century

  • mkent

    Darwin: SpaceX 20, Northrop 3, ULA 2, Rocket Lab 2, and Virgin Orbit 2.

    This comes up a lot.

    I agree that Bob’s table is confusing since it mixes foreign countries and American companies. It would be clearer and more consistent to combine the American numbers into a single entry in the table and use the text to pull out SpaceX and the other American companies. The way he does it, it’s not clear at all unless you dig into the details that it is America, not China, that is leading the launch race.

    But Bob wants to highlight SpaceX, not America, so he does what he does. His blog — his rules.

  • mkent: My goal is to highlight the success of all American companies, driven by profit, capitalism, and private ownership. If ULA was doing what SpaceX was doing I’d be thrilled, and it would get highlighted quite nicely. They aren’t. Neither is Blue Origin, yet. Or Rocket Lab, despite many promises.

    I eagerly await the day that all begin showing up in the leader board, so that SpaceX doesn’t dominate. It isn’t up to me, or SpaceX however. It is up to them.

  • mkent

    Robert: My comment isn’t about SpaceX vs. ULA vs. Northrop Grumman, etc. Comparing company vs. company is legitimate, as is showing how SpaceX is dominating the American launch market.

    But the confusion with your chart is that it compares American companies with foreign countries. For most of last year, the chart made it look like China, not the United States, was the world launch leader. A casual glance at the chart right now would show the same thing.

    I know enough about the launch industry that I can parse your chart and understand its meaning. But based on the frequency of questions very much like Darwin’s — it seems to happen about once every three or four times you post the chart — a lot of people do not. The chart seems to confuse, not clarify.

    I’m suggesting that putting all of the American launches under a single line titled “America” with the American companies split out in the text below instead of the other way around would reduce the confusion. Or perhaps breaking out the American companies in an indented sub-list under the “America” line instead of in the text would be even better.

    It would, perhaps, reduce the number of times you have to answer the same question.

  • mkent

    Something like:

    29 America
    —– 20 SpaceX
    —— 3 Northrop Grumman
    —— 2 ULA
    —— 2 Rocket Lab
    —— 2 Virgin Orbit
    20 China
    11 Russia
    1 India
    1 Europe

    …but with the hyphens replaced with the proper html code to indent the subgroup properly.

  • mkent

    My chart above still shows SpaceX dominating the American launch market, but it also shows America dominating the world launch market. It also shows at a glance one other thing. Space launch is beginning to be the United States, China, and everyone else. That’s even more apparent when you consider that nearly half of Russia’s launches are OneWeb launches and a South Korean rideshare.

    And THAT shows one other important point. SPACE is beginning to be the United States, China, and everyone else. Once the OneWeb launches are over, Russia will have a niche launching Progress and Soyuz capsules to the ISS, and Europe will have a space science niche. Nearly everything else will be either the United States or China.

    And THAT drives debate to your overall free market vs. controlled market point. How that plays out throughout the 21st century will be a pretty good indicator of the future of humanity.

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *