Test results from NASA saucer Mars landing test

Please consider donating to Behind the Black, by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar to the right or below. Your support will allow me to continue covering science and culture as I have for the past twenty years, independent and free from any outside influence.

NASA has released video and test results from the first test flight of its Low-Density Supersonic Decelerator (LDSD), referred by many press outlets as a “flying saucer” because of its shape.

The purpose of the test was to see if the saucer and its parachute would work to slow a vessel down sufficiently in the Martian atmosphere. The parachute tore and failed. The video describes the flight and the failure and how the data from this failure can now be used to modify the parachute for the next two test flights.



  • mpthompson

    I saw a documentary on the development of the parachutes for Spirit and Opportunity which experienced similar failures during development. Getting delicate parachutes to reliably open at supersonic velocities is a very tricky business. Particularly as the mass of the payload increases. In some ways, it seems harder than rocket science. :-)

  • fred k

    Seems like a relatively poor engineering choice to demand supersonic deployment and decel out of the parachutes.

    I’m sure the smart engineers at JPL / Hughes have looked at the trade of weight of fuel for propulsive decel vs. parachute weight.

    Even if propellent weight is a bit more, it could easily end up being much, much less expensive, and much, much less risky to use propulsive decel.

    I recall hearing several JPL employee declare that it was “impossible” to use propulsive decel in the atmosphere during entry. This has now been proven incorrect by the F9R.

  • Pzatchok

    Couldn’t they just throw their junk at <ars at a slower speed and wait a little longer?

    Then the entry speed might just be a little slower.

  • Edward

    There is a minimum entry speed determined by the speed of an object that falls from infinity. My quick calculation shows that at Mars it would be somewhere around 750 meters per second, which is still pretty fast for a parachute. So even if the approach to Mars were very slow, the reentry speed would still be fast.

    That is why Fred K suggested using rockets to slow the craft before reentry or before parachute deployment.

    Now that you mention it, I noticed that JPL stopped using Hohmann Transfer Orbits to get to Mars (minimum energy required to reach the second orbit). This transfer orbit would reach Mars orbit, but the spacecraft would be travelling much slower than Mars, making for a large relative velocity. Does anyone know whether JPL’s modern, faster transfer orbit results in a lower relative velocity between the spacecraft and Mars?

    I also think that Fred may be in error about Falcon 9 showing that rockets can be used during reentry, because Falcon 9 didn’t exactly reenter from orbit but from a suborbital trajectory. It didn’t go through a dramatic, ionizing, heat-shield-requiring, hard-to-fire-your-retrograde-rockets reentry.

  • Pzatchok

    Falcon ( is suborbital.

    Its their second stage that they are thinking of recovering from an orbital speed. But I don’t think they have finalized any plans or designs on it yet.

  • Pzatchok

    And for NASA’s new parachute system to work it has to get the chute out of the unstable wake of the in falling craft.
    Which should just mean a linger tether.

    But since the basic idea of an inflatable braking system does tend to work what if they reshapped it to form a lifting body and gave the craft a little control for the possibility to stay up in the atmosphere for a longer period. Thus shedding more speed before the chute deploys for landing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *