Conscious Choice cover

From the press release: In this ground-breaking new history of early America, historian Robert Zimmerman not only exposes the lie behind The New York Times 1619 Project that falsely claims slavery is central to the history of the United States, he also provides profound lessons about the nature of human societies, lessons important for Americans today as well as for all future settlers on Mars and elsewhere in space.

Conscious Choice: The origins of slavery in America and why it matters today and for our future in outer space, is a riveting page-turning story that documents how slavery slowly became pervasive in the southern British colonies of North America, colonies founded by a people and culture that not only did not allow slavery but in every way were hostile to the practice.  
Conscious Choice does more however. In telling the tragic history of the Virginia colony and the rise of slavery there, Zimmerman lays out the proper path for creating healthy societies in places like the Moon and Mars.


“Zimmerman’s ground-breaking history provides every future generation the basic framework for establishing new societies on other worlds. We would be wise to heed what he says.” —Robert Zubrin, founder of founder of the Mars Society.


Available everywhere for $3.99 (before discount) at Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and all ebook vendors, or direct from the ebook publisher, ebookit. And if you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and I get a bigger cut much sooner.

Viasat once again demands government block its competitor Starlink

In a letter to the FCC submitted on May 2, 2022, Viasat once again demanded the government block the deployment of SpaceX’s full 30,000 Starlink satellite constellation.

SpaceX shouldn’t be allowed to greatly expand its Starlink network while light pollution issues surrounding its deployed satellites remain unresolved, Jarrett Taubman, Viasat vice president and deputy chief of government affairs, said in a letter to the regulator.

While calls for a thorough environmental review that Viasat made for Starlink’s current generation of satellites in December 2020 were largely rejected, Taubman said SpaceX’s plan to grow the constellation by seven times “would have significant aesthetic, scientific, social and cultural, and health effects on the human environment on Earth.”

In other words, rather than try to compete with SpaceX, Viasat wants the government to squelch that competition. Though Viasat’s previous complaints have been rejected entirely, there is no guarantee that the Biden administration will continue to reject them. Recent evidence suggests instead that it will instead use this complaint as another opportunity to limit SpaceX’s operations, for political reasons.

Meanwhile, the only possible harm to Earth the full Starlink constellation might do is cause a limited interference in ground-based astronomy. Since astronomers have made so little effort to get their telescopes into orbit, above such interference, few should sympathize with them. If anything, Starlink should be the spur to get all of its telescopes off the ground and into space. Astronomers will not only avoid light interference from Starlink, they will get far better data without the atmosphere smearing their vision.


In order to remain completely independent and honest in my writing, I accept no sponsorships from big space companies or any political organizations. Nor do I depend on ads.

Instead, I rely entirely on the generosity of readers to keep Behind the Black running. You can either make a one time donation for whatever amount you wish, or you sign up for a monthly subscription ranging from $2 to $15 through Paypal, or $3 to $50 through Patreon, or any amount through Zelle.

The best method to donate or subscribe is by using Zelle through your internet bank account, since it charges no fees to you or I. You will need to give my name and email address (found at the bottom of the "About" page). What you donate is what I get.

To use Patreon, go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.

For PayPal click one of the following buttons:


Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:


If these electronic payment methods don't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to

Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652


  • Jay

    Just a bit of info, ViaSat owns WildBlue, a satellite internet service just like HughesNet. Believe it or not WildBlue was slower than HughesNet in my opinion. This protest was probably brought up since Starlink is being used by JSX and Hawaiian Air. For record, ViaSat is the internet connection for United Airlines. A side-note: I know that Alaska Airlines already has a lot of business deals with Amazon, so they will probably go with Kuiper.
    HughesNet has made it’s deal with OneWeb and Amazon has it’s Kuiper. ViaSat is out in the cold unless it can come up with it’s own LEO constellation of satellites.

  • Ryan Lawson

    They can also hire SpaceX to launch their orbital satellites at a greatly reduced price!

  • Jeff Wright

    ..nobody wookin….. .WAH!!!

  • GaryMike

    Those who can do, do.

    Those who can’t do, don’t.

  • Speaking of astronomers’ public antipathy toward Starlink, I notice that the latest (April 2022, published Apr. 22) issue of the journal Nature Astronomy includes several pieces devoted to astronomers’ flag-waving lobbying for “woke” agendas such as ensuring that astronomy is “sustainable” and doesn’t contribute 1 whit to climate change (even if research and the advancement of knowledge must be slowed). First of all, there’s the main editorial “Save the Earth… and space” in that issue.

    The editorial then references several other papers: first of all, a “Perspective” article in that issue, titled “The case for space environmentalism,” makes, as it says, “the case for considering the orbital space around the Earth as an additional ecosystem, subject to the same care and concerns, and the same broad regulations as the oceans and the atmosphere, for example.” Additionally: “We should consider damage to professional astronomy, public stargazing, and the cultural importance of the sky….”

    Furthermore, as the article notes in its “Main” section:

    “This Perspective has its origin in an Amicus Brief submitted to the US Court of Appeal in August 2021, in support of an appeal made by several organizations against a specific order made by the US Federal Communications Commission. That order granted licence amendments for SpaceX Starlink satellites.”

    That editorial in Nature Astronomy also indicates a recent (Mar. 21) article attempting to produce an “Estimate of the carbon footprint of astronomical research infrastructures” — concluding that the astronomers of the world exhibit an average carbon footprint per researcher of 36.6 +- 14.0 tons of CO2e per year! (powering supercomputers providing much of that carbon burden) — beyond that, they point to a “Focus” collection of articles (also from the previous month: Mar. 08) considering “The impact of astronomy on climate change.” OMG!

    All in all, sounds like quite a campaign that’s now ramping up and underway.

Readers: the rules for commenting!


No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.


However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.


Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.