Readers!
 

Scroll down to read this post.

 

I am now running my annual July fund-raising campaign to celebrate the twelfth anniversary of the establishment of Behind the Black. For many reasons, mostly political but partly ethical, I do not use Google, Facebook, Twitter. These companies practice corrupt business policies, while targeting conservative websites for censoring, facts repeatedly confirmed by news stories and by my sense that Facebook has taken action to prevent my readers from recommending Behind the Black to their friends.

 

Thus, I must have your direct support to keep this webpage alive. Not only does the money pay the bills, it gives me the freedom to speak honestly about science and culture, instead of being forced to write it as others demand.

 

Please consider donating by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar below.

 

Regular readers can support Behind The Black with a contribution via paypal:

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:


If Paypal doesn't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above. And if you buy the books through the ebookit links, I get a larger cut and I get it sooner.


Why the pause in global temperature rise?

The pause in global temperature rise has now lengthened past 18 years, and climate scientist Fred Singer asks some good scientific questions why.

Global warming skeptics like myself have been quick to note the long pause in any temperature increase since 1998, the lack of which has essentially invalidated all the climate models put forth by the global warming activists in the climate community. Singer goes one step further, however, asking the next question: Why has the temperature not risen? He doesn’t know, but he does put forth a number of suspects that the good scientists in the climate field should be pursuing, assuming they can open their eyes and work with real data for a change.

As usual, it isn’t as simple as we would like. The sun for example might explain it, but so could a lot of other factors, including a number put forth by global warming advocates. Good science demands that we look at them all, and find out the truth, rather than cherry-pick our favorite answer and ignore all other evidence.

Conscious Choice cover

From the press release: In this ground-breaking new history of early America, historian Robert Zimmerman not only exposes the lie behind The New York Times 1619 Project that falsely claims slavery is central to the history of the United States, he also provides profound lessons about the nature of human societies, lessons important for Americans today as well as for all future settlers on Mars and elsewhere in space.

 
Conscious Choice: The origins of slavery in America and why it matters today and for our future in outer space, is a riveting page-turning story that documents how slavery slowly became pervasive in the southern British colonies of North America, colonies founded by a people and culture that not only did not allow slavery but in every way were hostile to the practice.  
Conscious Choice does more however. In telling the tragic history of the Virginia colony and the rise of slavery there, Zimmerman lays out the proper path for creating healthy societies in places like the Moon and Mars.

 

“Zimmerman’s ground-breaking history provides every future generation the basic framework for establishing new societies on other worlds. We would be wise to heed what he says.” —Robert Zubrin, founder of founder of the Mars Society.

 

Available everywhere for $3.99 (before discount) at Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and all ebook vendors, or direct from the ebook publisher, ebookit. And if you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and I get a bigger cut much sooner.

4 comments

  • Cotour

    I watched a travel program the other night called Globe Treker. They were traveling to many different places like Greenland and the Arctic and the Amazon jungle and they state plainly that all of any temperature increase that is apparently actively destroying the earth as we know it is now caused by human activity. (what will they say if and when we slip into a sustained cold phase?)

    The human race, from what I and I have to assume the other people watching the show, has now fully taken over the thermostat of the earth and are in solid control of it.

    Higher, cleaner and next level technology for sure, but do we really have that much control over the climate of the earth? They speak as though there is an expectation that the earth has only one established range of temperatures and conditions and what humans are doing is screwing with that every day status quo. In this model the universe is linear and unchanging as presented by most of the media. What would they say to snow ball earth?

    I compare it to what the president leaves out and does not say in his daily commentary, he chooses by design to leave a lot of reality out of his version of how things actually operate, just to keep it simple for us simpletons.

  • Edward

    > (what will they say if and when we slip into a sustained cold phase?)

    What a good question. It is hard to find an answer; after all, not only is another ice age due any millennium now, but the US has reached its “Kyoto” goal (despite not having signed up). Simultaneously, as Monckton’s essay points out, the temperature has stopped rising.

    [Sarcasm Alert!]
    Obviously, our temperature-control regime has worked as intended by the Kyoto conference, yet no one is throwing a ticker tape parade, exclaiming, “Yay! We are saved!” Instead, our successful method of controlling Earth’s supposed fever has only resulted in further alarm, in which the climate scientists now ask, “where did all that heat go?” It is as though the climate scientists and politicians are disappointed that Kyoto worked, that temperatures have stabilized, and that climate change is now limited to the natural change that we could have expected had we not burned fossil fuels for the past few decades.

    Hmm. I may not have been as sarcastic as I thought I would be. Where *are* the parties and excitement over the stabilization of Earth’s temperature (hence the prevention of the predicted anthropogenic climate change, weather weirding, rising seas and associated flooded cities, etc.)?

  • Cotour

    What really bothers me about this stuff, just like what really bothers me about the president, its not what they do say, its what they fail or neglect to say by design.

  • joe

    reminds me of the O-zone hole around the poles and the montreal protocol, the government and the media had everyone convinced that the refrigerants of the time were causing thinning of the ozone, when twenty years later after the refrigerants were basically outlawed for sale, the ozone hole became much smaller, this had nothing to do with refrigerants this was a political win win for the government, say something is causing a problem that’s not a problem and when its shown to “not be a Problem” proclaim that the initiative worked!

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.