Scroll down to read this post.

 

Genesis cover

On Christmas Eve 1968 three Americans became the first humans to visit another world. What they did to celebrate was unexpected and profound, and will be remembered throughout all human history. Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8, Robert Zimmerman's classic history of humanity's first journey to another world, tells that story, and it is now available as both an ebook and an audiobook, both with a foreword by Valerie Anders and a new introduction by Robert Zimmerman.

 

The print edition can be purchased at Amazon. from any other book seller, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. The ebook is available everywhere for $5.99 (before discount) at amazon, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. If you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and the author gets a bigger cut much sooner.


The audiobook is also available at all these vendors, and is also free with a 30-day trial membership to Audible.
 

"Not simply about one mission, [Genesis] is also the history of America's quest for the moon... Zimmerman has done a masterful job of tying disparate events together into a solid account of one of America's greatest human triumphs."--San Antonio Express-News


Ingenuity responds after 63 days of silence

Overview map
Click for interactive map.

For the past two months the science and engineering teams for the Perseverance rover and the Ingenuity helicopter in Jezero Crater have been very silent as to the status of Ingenuity. On April 25, 2023 the Ingenuity team had posted their flight plan for the helicopter’s 52nd flight, with an expected flight date the next day.

Until today, however, no information about the results of that flight had been released. Except for one update in late May describing earlier issues with communications after flight 49, the science and engineering teams maintained radio silence about that 52nd flight in April.

Today’s update finally explained that silence:

The flight took place back on April 26, but mission controllers at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Southern California lost contact with the helicopter as it descended toward the surface for landing.

The Ingenuity team expected the communications dropout because a hill stood between the helicopter’s landing location and the Perseverance rover’s position, blocking communication between the two. The rover acts as a radio relay between the helicopter and mission controllers at JPL. In anticipation of this loss of communications, the Ingenuity team had already developed re-contact plans for when the rover would drive back within range. Contact was re-established June 28 when Perseverance crested the hill and could see Ingenuity again.

The flight plan for the 52nd flight in April had been to fly 1,191 feet to the west. Though the Ingenuity team has not yet released the actual flight details, I have indicated with the green line on the overview map above the estimated distance and direction planned. The green dot marks Ingenuity’s position before the flight, with the blue dot marking Perseverance’s present location. The red dotted line indicates the planned route for Perseverance.

Readers!

 

Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. Your support allows me the freedom and ability to analyze objectively the ongoing renaissance in space, as well as the cultural changes -- for good or ill -- that are happening across America. Fourteen years ago I wrote that SLS and Orion were a bad ideas, a waste of money, would be years behind schedule, and better replaced by commercial private enterprise. Only now does it appear that Washington might finally recognize this reality.

 

In 2020 when the world panicked over COVID I wrote that the panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Only in the past year have some of our so-called experts in the health field have begun to recognize these facts.

 

Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.

 

You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are four ways of doing so:

 

1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.

 

2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
 

3. A Paypal Donation or subscription:

 

4. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.

11 comments

  • Jeff

    “Mars Guy” update:
    https://youtu.be/fCIqgNWJ4jc
    4:09

  • Ray Van Dune

    Does anyone have an explanation for why there was no announcement of the anticipated loss of contact, either before or after it occurred, even as a speculation? The US space program has a tradition of openness that doesn’t seem to have been followed here…or am I missing something?

  • Ray Van Dune: NASA long ago abandoned its openness policy in many ways. In this case, it followed the Soviet approach, which is to say nothing unless it is possible to put a positive spin on it.

    There was no reason for the Ingenuity team to not announce what they knew in April, that the flight was apparently good up until just before landing, when contact was lost because of a hill blocking sightline communications. In fact, this would have been excellent publicity! Think of the questions news reports could have asked: Has Ingenuity landed properly? Did it crash? Is it all right? When will we regain communications and find out?

    Instead, they went radio silent until they could say all was well. Very disappointing, counter productive, and indicative of a circle-the-wagons defensive attitude wholly self-defeating.

  • Ray Van Dune

    Bob, I hope I can take your reply as generally supportive of my observation, thank you.

    But why the failure to put the easy and reasonable positive spin on it… “Oh, it just landed behind a hill, but since it is autonomous and well-proven, it is almost certainly okay”.

    Could it be that someone was embarrassed that they did not predict a potential loss of contact? I hope it was an honest oversight, and not something so childish!

  • Ray Van Dune: This is very complicate work. If they were surprised by the loss of contact, no one should feel the slightest bit of shame. They are working on the edge of the unknown, pushing that envelope. We all expect surprises, no matter how hard these engineers try to design them out.

    If they did feel embarrassed and acted to protect themselves, they should be more embarrassed now.

  • GaryMike

    Belva was my mother’s name. I never understood why her parents burdened her with that name.

    It might have been a warning that she wasn’t going to be the nicest person on the planet.

    She wasn’t.

    Naming her Belva may have contributed to her wanting to make everyone else around her just as miserable. No, it was just her.

    Mom, I love you. You were a real bitch..

  • GaryMike

    I’ll go away for a while.

    Too much attitude.

  • Andi

    Wonder if they ever considered this scenario. Seems like if it lost comms on the way down, it could realize this, rise back up, and try and reestablish contact long enough to receive new instructions.

    Or is there no reserve power for such a maneuver?

  • Andi: Remember, the helicopter is programmed to fly entirely on its own. There is no need for communications during the flight. The loss of comm occurred just before landing because there was no line of sight to Perseverance, and this prevented Ingenuity from transmitting its data from the flight.

    It could be that the engineering teams had no idea at all about anything that happened on the flight, until they regained communications and obtained that data. If so, then from April till now they knew nothing about Ingenuity’s status. They should have said so.

  • Andi

    Bob, thanks for the info. For some reason I thought that it was transmitting (and receiving) data as it flew.

  • Andi: I should thank you. Your question made me realize that the Ingenuity team likely had no idea what had happened at all during that April flight, and didn’t find out until now.

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *