Having abandoned its short-lived NASA-built core module concept due to industry opposition, NASA is now requesting new proposals from the private sector for its space station program to replace ISS.
Based on industry’s input, NASA will proceed with its original plan to procure commercial services through FAR-based contract(s) awarded via full and open competition. Industry has indicated there is significant capital investment behind this approach and expressed high confidence in their ability to attract additional capital investment and expand future market opportunities after NASA makes an award.
NASA intends to award firm-fixed-price, multi-award, indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contracts supporting development, certification, and services. This approach would allow NASA to select two or more contractors through early development, followed by a competitive task order for final design, test, evaluation, as well as certification and services from one or more contractors. [emphasis mine]
The deadline for submission is July 27, 2026. From these proposals NASA will proceed with its original plan to award construction contracts to build at least one new space station. The highlighted words above however suggest a significant change in the program. Under the original plan, NASA said it could only afford to finance one private station, something NASA administrator Jared Isaacman found unsatisfactory. NASA officials also did not believe there was sufficient private investment capital to make up the difference if NASA spread the money around to more than one station.
It looks like the industry has changed his mind. It now appears NASA will entertain multiple station proposals, and could conceivably award as many as three contracts. Of the five stations being built (see my list below), three are very robust at this point — Vast, Starlab, and Axiom — with a lot of private investment, a slew of customers, and some construction completed. Choosing one or two of these would be difficult, and possibly counter-productive, as all three have viable plans.
While I am speculating wildly, it looks to me that this NASA request for proposals is laying the groundwork for awarding at least three space station contracts, with these three stations in the lead. The amount of money in NASA’s space station budget might not be sufficient to finance all three, but it appears it might be enough once supplemented with the private capital all three stations have on hand.
Stay tuned. Some very exciting developments might very well be in the offing.
My updated ranking of the five American space stations presently under development:
» Read more