FAA and the Biden administration proves it is out to destroy SpaceX
The FAA to SpaceX “Nice company you got here.
Sure would be a shame if something happened to it.”
In the past week the FAA proved unequivocally that it is abusing its regulatory powers for political reasons, imposing much harsher regulatory restrictions on SpaceX while allowing other companies much more free rein.
That reality became most evident first with the FAA response to the serious failure of one of the strap-on solid-fueled boosters during the second test launch of ULA’s Vulcan rocket on October 4, 2024. During that launch something went seriously wrong with that booster 38 seconds after launch, involving an explosion and what appeared to be ejection of that booster’s nozzle. Though the launch succeeded in placing its payload into the correct orbit, it required the rocket’s main engines to compensate aggressively.
Despite this, the FAA decided no investigation by it was necessary.
The Federal Aviation Administration, which licenses commercial space launches in the United States, said in a statement that it assessed the booster anomaly and “determined no investigation is warranted at this time.” The FAA is not responsible for regulating launch vehicle anomalies unless they impact public safety.
This decision is correct, but the contrast with the FAA’s treatment of SpaceX is quite striking. If the FAA applied the absurd standard it has been using against SpaceX, it would claim that this Vulcan launch threatened public safety because the incident occurred 38 seconds after launch and was thus relatively close to Florida, where an out of control rocket could potentially threaten public safety.
Such a threat of course really doesn’t exist, as the FAA correctly concluded, because the rocket has a self-destruct system to prevent it from crashing in habitable areas.
Yet the agency failed to use this logic with SpaceX. Instead the FAA decided anything SpaceX launches that doesn’t work perfectly poses a serious public safety threat, no matter where or how it happens, and thus has repeatedly grounded SpaceX launches. A first stage, flown already 23 times, falls over after soft-landing successfully on its drone ship in the middle of the Atlantic, and somehow this justified the FAA grounding SpaceX due to the threat to public safety. A second stage, after successfully placing two astronauts into orbit, misfires during its de-orbit burn but still lands in the middle of the ocean, far from any habitable regions, and somehow this justified the FAA grounding SpaceX due to the threat to public safety.
And the fact that a Superheavy returning to its launchpad at Boca Chica will cause a sonic boom — as do every Falcon 9 landings at Cape Canaveral or Vandenberg — is now justification for grounding Starship/Superheavy test launches, even though sonic booms pose zero threat to anyone other than startling them with the sudden noise.
The FAA further illustrated its bias against SpaceX when it decided to allow the company to do its launch this morning of Europe’s Hera asteroid mission, but specifically stated that the company’s other launches remain grounded.
The SpaceX Falcon 9 vehicle is authorized to return to flight only for the planned Hera mission scheduled to launch on Oct. 7 from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida. The FAA has determined that the absence of a second stage reentry for this mission adequately mitigates the primary risk to the public in the event of a reoccurrence of the mishap experienced with the Crew-9 mission.
Safety will drive the timeline for the FAA to complete its review of SpaceX’s Crew-9 mishap investigation report and when the agency will authorize Falcon 9 to return to regular operations.
When compared with the agency’s decision regarding ULA, this decision is ridiculous, because it is certain that the Vulcan strap-on boosters as well as its first stage did not return to Earth in the locations planned, though all landed in the ocean safely. The risk to public safety is the same, nil. Why then is the FAA blocking SpaceX and not ULA?
Using this same crazy criteria, the agency would immediately ground ULA, insist that no further launches can occur until the agency completes its own “investigation” (which will simply be a retyping of whatever conclusions ULA’s engineers come to after they complete the company’s probe). That grounding would last weeks, maybe months, based on the FAA’s behavior in connection with SpaceX.
But the FAA has not done this. With ULA it has acted properly, staying out because it has no place at the table. That it doesn’t do the same for SpaceX now proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that the agency is putting its thumb on the scale and treating SpaceX more severely.
We must then ask why? Of all the rocket companies that have ever existed, SpaceX has clearly proven it is the most reliable and safest ever. It launches and relaunches its rockets more frequently than anyone has ever done before, and does so with remarkably few issues. ULA meanwhile is a typical old style rocket company that cannot reuse any of its rockets, and routinely has niggling problems during each launch because those rockets aren’t built to the same reliable standards as SpaceX’s reusable Falcon 9.
To regulate SpaceX so harshly while letting ULA off the hook shows us the FAA management has a political agenda in its actions. It is going after SpaceX, and the only reason I can identify is Elon Musk’s public support of Donald Trump and the Republican Party and his opposition to the Democratic Party that controls the White House and most of the federal bureaucracy.
In other words, the FAA is abusing its regulatory power for political reasons.
The FCC proves its partisan hostility to SpaceX
Nor is this anti-Musk/SpaceX effort by the White House apparently limited just to the FAA. For example, Musk immediately offered to provide free Starlink terminals to aid the rescue efforts following the Hurricane Helene, including using them for direct cellphone-to-satellite service in partnership with T-Mobile. Yet, the FCC did not give its approval for this latter service for almost a week, thus hampering that rescue effort. That approval required a waiver because the agency is still weighing the SpaceX/T-Mobile plan in the face of objections from other cellular companies.
In a sane world, the FCC would have instantly approved the waiver, noting that it was very temporary pending its normal regulatory review. Instead, the agency sat on its hands for a week, preventing SpaceX from getting positive PR but seriously hindering the rescue effort.
Similarly, the FCC last year canceled an almost billion dollar grant it had previously awarded to SpaceX for providing high-speed internet service to rural regions, claming absurdly that the company had failed to “demonstrate that it could deliver the promised service,” even though SpaceX is the only company successfully doing so. Had that grant been allowed to go through, the region hit by Helene would have had that high speed Starlink service already.
Adding to the attacks by the FAA and FCC, the EPA has also piled on, imposing its own absurd regulatory rules to block further Starship/Superheavy test launches at Boca Chica, claiming ludicrously that potable water used in the rocket’s launch deluge system will somehow harm the environment.
Public safety and the environment have nothing to do with these actions. The Biden administration and its Democratic Party political appointees at these agencies are going after SpaceX simply because of Elon Musk’s political choices. They don’t like his decision to support their political opponents, and are telling every other businessman in the country that if you don’t kowtow to them, if you dare oppose them, they will do the same to you.
Such behavior violates every decent, legal, and moral law in a democratic republic. Anyone who is willing to play that kind of vicious game of extortion and blackmail should be tarred and feathered and run out of town on a rail, as fast as possible. At a minimum, this behavior justifies the need for a harsh and merciless house-cleaning, beginning first with the thugs in the White House who think Americans are a plaything they can slap about at will.
Readers!
Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. Your support allows me the freedom and ability to analyze objectively the ongoing renaissance in space, as well as the cultural changes -- for good or ill -- that are happening across America. Fourteen years ago I wrote that SLS and Orion were a bad ideas, a waste of money, would be years behind schedule, and better replaced by commercial private enterprise. Only now does it appear that Washington might finally recognize this reality.
In 2020 when the world panicked over COVID I wrote that the panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Only in the past year have some of our so-called experts in the health field have begun to recognize these facts.
Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.
You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are four ways of doing so:
1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.
2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
3. A Paypal Donation or subscription:
4. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652
You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.
Directly related:
POLITICAL TREASON: YOUR GOVERNMENT AND COMPANY
“All politicians and governments want the Constitution gutted because it does not allow them to do as they please. 1. There is you the American citizen that the Constitution recognizes has fundamental Rights and it protects them. 2. There is the Constitution itself that stands between you and government. 3. And there are the politically empowered people who inhabit government who will without fail abuse their political power as it relates to the citizens’ Rights.”
“Where is the money for Americans who have suffered a massive disaster? It has been redirected and spent by the government that is importing their new Democrat voting block into America. The politically empowered politicians in your own government have abandoned you, the citizens of America because the citizens of America do not serve their political agenda purposes. Other than providing them with their tax dollars to spend on their own political power self-interests.
Like I said, diabolical and BRILLIANT!”
https://www.sigma3ioc.com/post/your-government-is-not
As Elon stated, get out and vote and get everyone you can to vote.
If it weren’t for double-standards, the Left would have no standards at all.
The FAA might be correct in not grounding the Vulcan (I’m not sure), but the idea of the USSF accepting Vulcan as having made two “successful” flights is ridiculous.
See my reasoning under the Jane Mansfield / open thread below. IMHO, ULA was lucky not to completely lose the second launch, and has a potentially serious problem on its hands in the GEM 63 XL solid rocket booster.
This whole situation is a missive head scratcher for me…. I cannot honestly see that the verious agency’s involved here are blocking SpaceX purely due to Musks political views… If anything they would be better funded under another Trump administration. Heaven knows.. I’m no conspiracy theorist, but I smell something stinking further under the surface than what meets the eye.
It’s very easy to roll with the easiest explanation, but as an outsider looking in, I feel there is more to this story than just politics.
When there is more to a story than what meets the eye, it usually boils down to money.. I don’t claim to have any credible ideas of who, where or how…. But I would be willing to bet a bottle of fine scotch whiskey that this story goes much deeper than the simplistic idea that the agency’s involved in grounding SpaceX are doing it for purely political reasons.
( And please…. If you think I am wrong, explain why without insulting my intelligence, claiming I am neieve, or trying to belittle me… I enjoy a discussion, I don’t enjoy being spoken down to. Something that occurs more and more on this forum the more time passes…)
Lee S. I think Occam’s razor applies here. Why look for something deeper than human pettiness? I suppose if you wanted to look at the influence the Chinese party has on our politicians (Democrats in particular), there might be a deeper play to delay the US while China forges ahead on copying SpaceX.
Lee S,
Unfortunately, hate often trumps logic, reasoning, and practicality. Just as so many people on the Left hate Trump, they have been told since the purchase of Twitter to hate Musk. Prior to the purchase, and Musk’s efforts to make it a platform for free speech, Musk could do little wrong, and he received constant praise. Since then, Musk’s apparent refusal to fully conform with the Left’s every belief has him being criticized and demonized. Unless and until he fully returns to The Fold, he will be hated, and every effort will be made to thwart him, even if it makes little common sense.
Lee S, there may be a small money element in this (Boeing, ULA) but that you don’t believe politics, straight from the Democrat Party is behind this defies belief. Note the weaponization of the Federal apparatus against Trump. This is now being done to Musk. End of story.
If Trump gets up I hope Whittaker enjoys his colonoscopy by the IRS and any other federal charges that can be laid. Lock him up in Leavenworth. Pour encourager les autres.
The forces of light must learn to get down in the gutter and fight like Progressives.
The US now has Barons to appoint a new King.
Wait until the winning side gets rid of the loosing barons so they could never oppose them again.
The progressive left would never have gotten this far without the financial support of those barons who want influence go gain more wealth.
Lee S: Others are explaining this as well as I. My only comment is to please ask you to please stop misspelling “naive.”
Ray Van Dune: I think your reasoning about the Space Force ultimate decision is right on the money. I also think it is certain that the Space Force will certify Vulcan. It is committed to this rocket, and must look the other way despite the idiocy of doing so.
If only Musk had agreed to hire illegal trespassers, Trans, and placed a huuuuge Biden/Harris sign on the sides of the SuperHeavy Booster and Starship.
The Hussein/Biden/Harris Regime cannot stand Musk and President Trump. They both made money the old fashioned way…. They EARNED IT.
“… This whole situation is a missive head scratcher for me…. I cannot honestly see that the verious agency’s involved here are blocking SpaceX purely due to Musks political views… …”
Yes, the case is not strong that the FAA is out to get Elon. The FAA approved another flight 4 profile flight. Go ahead and say that does little to help SpaceX. What another approved flight does is boost the positive profile of Elon before the American and world public. Which is exactly what the democrat party wants to avoid. Kind of proves that the FAA is doing a poor job of doing the bidding of its political masters. Keep in mind the deep state is thing onto itself. The want a slice of the pie and are savvy enough to realize that SpaceX makes a lot of pies.
Bob Zimmerman, I reluctantly agree that USSF may try to go ahead and make Vulcan operational, but the first $10B spy sat that goes into the drink in charred shreds will put a stop to some Pentagon careers, and to any ULA buyout fantasies..
If there is a flaw in the GEM 63 XL, the next explosion will not be one they can pretend away… the nature of the barely-contained violent explosion that is an SRB means that any small failure almost always escalates into a very bad day for everything else around it. They got lucky once, but it won’t happen that way again.
The only responsible course of action is a thorough inspection of every SRB motor, and that’s going to take a lot of careful specialized work.
Instead of harassing Musk, this administration needs to resurrect Project Stormfury and spray silver nitrate to weaken hurricanes while they are out to sea.
Steve Richter – if the FAA applied the same criteria it has used for intervening in both Starship and Falcon 9 flights, Vulcan would be grounded for quite some time. Since it isn’t, I draw the ‘administration screws Musk’ conclusion. Admittedly watching ULA wrestle with the FAA has some sport value.
Ronaldus, had Elon done what you suggest, they would have turned around and prosecuted him for ITAR violations. It was a Catch-22.
Lee … This is about more than money. It is about self-righteousness. Elon’s opening-up of Twitter (now X) is offensive to the hive-mind bureaucrats, who believe that theirs is the One True Way and therefore should be the only message in the public square. They can no longer control the message through Twitter, because of him..
And the more someone like him (or Trump) succeeds in serving the American people, the more obvious it becomes that we do not need so much bureaucratic intervention by the elite/elite-adjacent, who have built their entire lives around becoming policy-makers and leverage government’s coercive force to impose their vision of the “common good”. (And yes, advance personally at the same time. Nice work if you can get it,)
Steve … they want Elon to COMPLY to their diktats. Much like the mask Karens with their “just one ask” on that subject. Like our host, why should he be coerced to comply with such petty minds, when his actions do not pose a clear/present/significant interference with the unalienable rights of others? The precedent of previous compliance would make it easier to control him – AND US – now and in the future – “what is so different now, from when Elon went along?”
This is what Elon thinks:
https://nypost.com/2024/10/07/us-news/elon-musk-suggests-hell-be-thrown-in-prison-if-harris-beats-trump-if-he-loses-im-fed/
It is funny when your perspective is adjusted in extreme real-world terms, it has a clarifying effect on most people. Elon knows where his bread / business interests is buttered and possibly where his freedom lies.
Does anyone here think that if the Obama/ Biden / Harris / WEF / U.N. policy arch is allowed to continue that many of our freedoms may well become questionable? I do not.
Say the wrong thing, post the wrong thing, suggest the wrong thing, think the wrong thing, dare question the stated policy by the government.?
I know, it is much different in Sweden, for now.
“Hillary Clinton warns that allowing free speech on social media means ‘we lose control’ (nypost.com)”
John Kerry (D): First Amendment is a “Major Block” to controlling what the people see, say and hear: https://youtu.be/amJQoNilH1Q?si=oVuzdvehf5-Q_sni 3 min.
They have come so far, does anyone think they are going to willingly back off now? They must be metaphorically / politically vanquished. And if they are not, they will keep going until they have destroyed what is I.E. the Constitution.
That is their plain to see trajectory as per their rhetoric and their actions in the real-world..
Robert wrote: “ They don’t like his decision to support their political opponents, and are telling every other businessman in the country that if you don’t kowtow to them, if you dare oppose them, they will do the same to you.”
Wasn’t there a political party in Europe in the second quarter of the 20th century that did this same thing once it gained power in that country? We may want to learn from the past, as Santayana recommended, all those years ago.
______________
Lee S wrote: “When there is more to a story than what meets the eye, it usually boils down to money.”
It usually boils down to power. Money is only a more visible manifestation of power, a way to wield that power. The saying is that the love of money is the root of all evil, but the root of the money is the love of power. What good is the money if it does not come with the power to influence people and events? It may be the power to eat tonight or the power to found a colony on Mars. Both take money, in today’s civilized society.
“And please…. If you think I am wrong, explain why without insulting my intelligence, claiming I am neieve, or trying to belittle me… I enjoy a discussion, I don’t enjoy being spoken down to.”
Since Lee S considers someone disagreeing with him to be all three of these things, explaining why he is wrong cannot be done without him taking offense. Since he is set in his opinions and will not accept any reason why he is wrong makes explanation futile.
An additional piece of evidence that Robert did not mention was the second stage debris that fell in Oregon or Washington a few years ago. That second stage had a worse engine anomaly that resulted in debris falling close to inhabited areas, but the FAA did not require a grounding during any investigation, and I don’t remember them requiring an investigation. Then again, this happened before Musk announced any allegiances toward anything other than the Democrat Party, which he supported at the time. What changed between then and now? Musk’s publicly stated allegiances.
“I feel there is more to this story than just politics.” And: “I don’t claim to have any credible ideas of who, where or how….” [ellipsis in original]
For Lee S, feelings trump reason, logic, or intelligent thought. Leftists have plenty of the first but lack the following three. This is why his opinion completely lacks any evidence or even any believable ideas. All he has done is to contradict Robert’s conclusions that are based upon evidence, logic, and reasoning.
It is because Lee S feels, rather than thinks, that he feels as though he has been insulted, has been thought to be naive, or has been belittled. But it is mere disagreement, which the left often misinterprets as hatred (another feeling).
The left projects their own inability to be thoughtful onto the rest of us, feeling that we must also be creatures of emotion, thus they feel that our motivations cannot be logic but must also be emotional, such as hatred. If we feel different ideas than theirs, we must be hateful people to have the audacity to differ from them.
The right projects their own ability to think onto leftists, believing that if only we had that one more piece of information or logical connection between evidence, then we would finally convince leftists of reality. But these leftists are so far gone that they are now willing to live the fantasies that boys who feel like girls are in reality the girls they feel themselves to be, even if the boys only want to get into the girls’ locker room or beat the girls at their own sports. This, leftists feel, is equity.
________________
Steve Richter wrote: “What another approved flight [4 profile] does is boost the positive profile of Elon before the American and world public. Which is exactly what the democrat party wants to avoid.”
Actually, what it would do is make the American and world public wonder why SpaceX wasted its time, money, and resources repeating a successful test rather than proceeding to a test that they could learn something from. It may also give the false impression that flight 4 was a failure, not the success that it was. Why repeat it if it was a success? Kind of proves that Steve Richter also cannot accept reality, reason, or logic when it has been explained to him several times.
The desire to watch another rocket launch does not make that launch a good idea, otherwise SpaceX should just launch them as soon as they make them. Forget about retiring the obsolete assemblies, just launch them for the show. After all, it boosts the company’s positive profile.
The rocket might not crash into John Q Public, but that circular nozzle looking thingy was ejected at a certain velocity. I get that downrange is over water, but still. Expody rockets should be grounded over ones that aren’t.
Can we stop the “repeat Flight 4 nonsense?” The FAA has raised doubts about the heat shield changes so a repeat of flight 4 cannot happen without a new launch license.
The FAA’s record in its treatment of SpaceX *is* troubling. And it may take a lawsuit in federal court for SpaceX to force a post-Loper curtailment of the agency’s expansive interpretation of its regulations in its enforcement actions against SpaceX.
One small point of clarification, though:
The FAA further illustrated its bias against SpaceX when it decided to allow the company to do its launch this morning of Europe’s Hera asteroid mission, but specifically stated that the company’s other launches remain grounded.
Trip Harriss, SpaceX’s Spaceport integration director, clarified on Twitter this morning that NASA, not the FAA, licenses the Europa Clipper launch. Which surely means it’s got a green light.
https://x.com/SpaceXTrip/status/1843008398847312162
Unfortunately, NASA doesn’t license most of SpaceX’s other launches….
Richard M: So let me get this straight: NASA thinks SpaceX can launch safely, and thus the FAA decides it must make believe it agrees, but only for this one launch?
The whole game stinks of corruption beyond belief.
@ Edward … Quote.. “It is because Lee S feels, rather than thinks, that he feels as though he has been insulted, has been thought to be naive, or has been belittled. But it is mere disagreement, which the left often misinterprets as hatred (another feeling).”
There we go again… Talking straight over my head.. I am actually in the room. Enough said!
@ Bob…. Sorry… My spell checker has reprogrammed itself, and my own spelling is not the best.
@ Everyone…. I really don’t understand how one agency can hamstring another under the same government… Who is the next up the chain of your government? Musk is tasked with getting starship up and running, yet is having all these obstacles thrown in his way. I really can’t believe that it is simply down to a power play, and spite over his policies regarding Twitter/X. I know you all have some distain for ” the left” , and certainly your left is very different to my left, but I still smell a deeper influence than the Biden administration disliking Musk.
Doesn’t your political system have checks and balances to ensure that one agency cannot sabotage another? And is there nothing further up the chain that can bang some heads together and get everyone pulling in the same direction?
Yes indeed money is involved consider this from John Batchelor show https://audioboom.com/posts/8586031-newworldreport-assassination-in-sheinbaum-s-mexico-joseph-humire-jmhumire-securefreesoc-e
Instead of cowering before and trying to appease the bureaucracy, Musk is going scorched earth.
Some recent headlines:
• “SHOCK! Elon Musk Tells Tucker the Stunning Reason So Many Billionaires Support Kamala”
“You know I think part of why Kamala’s getting so much support is that if Trump wins that Epstein client list is going to become public. And some of those billionaires behind Kamala are terrified of that outcome (He names Reid Hoffman and Bill Gates) Between Diddy and Epstein there’s probably several thousand hours of footage. If Trump wins we can do some house cleaning and shed light on things.”
• “Supreme Court Declines Request From Elon Musk’s 𝕏 to Review Jack Smith’s Trump Account Warrant”
• “Musk Slams Gavin Gruesome Newsom During Tucker Interview, Calls Him ‘The Joker’ as Crime Remains Problem in Commiefornia”
• “Elon Musk Responds to Senator Mark Kelly and CNN’s Bashing Session and Attack on Him”
• “PAC Funded by Elon Musk Offers a $47 Bounty for Every Swing-State Voter Referred to Sign a Petition Embracing the 1st and 2nd Amendments”
• “Elon Musk makes his first appearance at a Trump rally and casts the election in dire terms”
Lee S,
It is customary, when making an argument against a particular conclusion with which you disagree, to offer an alternative explanation that equally well, or better, accords with the available facts and evidence. You have failed to do that here, other than expressing an inchoate feeling that it must, somehow, be a matter of money in play here and not simply politically-motivated abuse of power.
It seems, at a minimum, that you might provide at least a bit of potential detail anent this hazy hypothesis. What money are we talking about here? Who is it who wants to get paid? How does jamming up SpaceX advance their pecuniary interests? A simple, blanket rejection of any base motivation on the part of any government agency or any of its functionaries is certainly understandable on the part of someone with a long history of statist enthusiasms, but these hardly constitute a case anyone of a different political persuasion is bound to either respect or accept.
There does seem to be more at play than the simplistic Democrats/leftist evil scenarios in play. There is a widespread corruption that is inherent in power that is seldom avoided historically and worldwide. But more corrupting than power is immunity. Any of us has the power for mass murder by swerving across the line to head on a bus. What we don’t have is the immunity to the consequences to ourselves.
From schools to military procurement to medical costs, if one can’t find examples of financial abuse/corruption, one isn’t looking. Spaceflight happens to be the focus of most here which is why there is so much recrimination. Getting my house construction permit took over two years due to it being very non-standard for the area. The bureaucratic norm is not to approve the unusual. Accusations do more to increase resistance than to expedite results. I believe that 90%+ of the building and permitting departments could go away to the benefit of my county.. I know that yelling corruption and Democrat/Republican at the individuals involved creates heat without light.
Unless there is a realistic way to reform the building departments/military procurements/educational system/insurance fraud and hundreds of other issues, I will work with the systems available. I suspect that Musk and company are working a bit deeper game than most here acknowledge with a goal of real reform as opposed to knee jerk accusations.
“How Long Do You Think My Prison Sentence Will Be?”
Elon Musk
Tucker Carlson Network on X (11-7-24)
https://youtu.be/Y_FH8m353g4
(1:48:41)
“Doesn’t your political system have checks and balances to ensure that one agency cannot sabotage another?”
Considering these unregulated “regulatory bodies” have no right to exist as they stand, I’m not sure how there would be. These bodies are outside of the powers granted to the federal government and inherently strip rights away from the states where they rightly belong.
Lee-
ref–“Doesn’t your political system have checks and balances to ensure that one agency cannot sabotage another?”
This goes back to FDR and Wilson before him, and a number of key Amendments to our Constitution, which enabled things to go off the rails.
US Senators were originally designed to represent their respective State, (The separate & sovereign States created the Federal Government.) and those Senators were appointed by the respective State Legislatures. If the Legislature of the State didn’t like what their Senator was doing, he got recalled.)
Changing the Constitution to direct election of Senators, breached one firewall. The House is directly elected, and now so is the Senate, and the individual States have little actual representation.
Our Constitutional prohibition against general taxes had to be breached with the Income Tax Amendment. Prior to that no general taxes could be levied upon the Citizens unless the taxes were apportioned by population, meaning each Citizen would pay the same amount.
1890’s we get the rise of the ‘progressive era,’ and fabian socialism; these people believe the socialist revolution will be voted-in progressively, by degree, over decades.
FDR creates literally a dozen “3 Letter Agencies,” in the 1930’s, to systematically control and regulate everything from the Federal level. Congress delegates authority to these Agencies, and they become little Fiefdoms of bureaucrats.
After reading all these comments it’s quite evident that this Lee S person is either a paid shill or an extremely dedicated DEMOcrat with limited spelling abilities! The MASSIVE evidence provided clearly shows the FAA is indeed acting solely in a POLITICAL manner, much like the DOJ/FBI/CIA/DHS and ALL the other Gov’t Agencies infested with kamikaze DEMOcrats! They will GLADLY CRASH Our Nation if they cannot MAINTAIN POWER to DESTROY IT and CONTROL the RUINS!! Rather SICK IDEOLOGY!!
They KNOW that if PRESIDENT TRUMP has a LEGITIMATELY DECIDED ELECTION then changes will be made and people will be exposed and sent to prison! This is LIFE or DEATH or IMPRISONMENT for LIFE for a great many so the mere grounding of a POLITICAL OPPONENT is a SMALL thing to them – a PETTY thing! If we are not successful it will get WORSE!
I do thank Mr. Zimmerman for his dedication to this site! Thank you sir!!
BLSinSC-
-Lee can speak for himself, but he does live in Europe (Sweden?) and he likes rocket-stuff, like the rest of us. (Lee, forgive me if I mischaracterize you at all.)
I think however it would be fair to say ‘politically’ that Lee feels; in the place & time he is at, he receives Value from the State that equates with the amount of taxes he has to pay, and lives under a Government and System that he perceives doesn’t overly oppressive him in his day-to-day life and provides for the downtrodden.
Lee S
Our checks and balance system is a mess.
Regulatory agencies like the FAA and ATF have a power beyond what congress actually gave them when formed. They can change their regulations and or definitions or words at will without congressional approval.
This to get them to change their actions a company or person must first prove they are the party being effected by the rule, then they must take the agency to court, and in most cases be willing to take it all the way to the Supreme Court. and in some cases this could take years.
For this FAA ruling against Space X this would mean Space X must prove they are being treated differently than other similar companies.
The faster resolution would be to get a private reporter to question the FAA administrator in public and get them to change their mind by public pressure. Or change the administration and force a change from the top down.
For those who think that Space X should just make a relaunch under the old flight profiles. Redo launch 4.
This accomplishes nothing and wastes launches doing the very same thing over and over.
Space X needs to bring the second stage down in American waters after several orbits and the first stage back to the launch tower.
Our State Department or ATF is doing this.
https://www.breitbart.com/2nd-amendment/2024/10/08/exclusive-biden-harris-admin-has-held-israels-rifle-order-hostage-for-350-days/
“Doesn’t your political system have checks and balances to ensure that one agency cannot sabotage another?”
Back in the mid 1990’s when the GPS system was very new the civilian signal was deliberately degraded by the Department of Defense so the position accuracy was a few tens of meters. At the same time the Coastguard (part of defense) was busy installing differential GPS stations at ports and harbors to get about one meter accuracy. A retired employee of Christians In Action told me at the time “Son, if you truly understood how our government worked, this would not surprise you”.
I doubt it works any differently in Sweden, Australia or anywhere else when you get down into the details.
The difference with Musk and the FAA is that the Biden administration and Democrats are deliberately spiteful towards those they see as thwarting them and care not one whit for the country or humanity.
Lee S wrote: “There we go again… Talking straight over my head.. I am actually in the room. Enough said!”
As I said, we can’t say anything without him taking offense. It is why he comments, just to complain to us that we didn’t agree with his superior socialist wisdom. He even told us he would take offense, which is how it was so easy to predict.
Lee S asked: “Doesn’t your political system have checks and balances to ensure that one agency cannot sabotage another?”
The checks and balances are only between the three branches of government, and these checks and balances are designed to sabotage the efforts of the other branches of government so that one of them does not gain so much power that We the People lose our power over the government.
“And is there nothing further up the chain that can bang some heads together and get everyone pulling in the same direction?”
Further up the chain is Biden, and he has already gotten everyone pulling in the same direction.
Lee S,
You wrote: “I know you all have some distain for ‘the left’, and certainly your left is very different to my left, but I still smell a deeper influence than the Biden administration disliking Musk.”
No, that rat-like smell is Biden and his administration, and Biden is as deep as the influence gets. Your left seems just the same as ours. You being a good example, as I noted in my previous comment in this thread.
______________
John hare wrote: “The bureaucratic norm is not to approve the unusual.”
But it is not the unusual that is causing the delay. It is a sonic boom, which is not unusual, and it is a slightly expanded area of influence for an environmental impact report. The additional area is just the same as the already approved area. There is just more area. The birds are the same, the turtles are the same, the beach is the same, the road is the same, and the closures are no different. Yet somehow these government bureaucrats have to take their sweet time to make sure that … what? Nothing changed for them to make sure of.
“I suspect that Musk and company are working a bit deeper game than most here acknowledge with a goal of real reform as opposed to knee jerk accusations.”
I seem to recall that Robert has said on several occasions that he, Robert, thinks Musk is trying to reform the corrupted system that we have now. Or has my memory failed me again?
_______________
Matt is correct. The powers and duties of the government are enumerated in Article I, section 8 of the Constitution. Hampering local commerce or the public is not among them. Come to think of it, development testing is not commerce. A rocket launch is not commerce with foreign Nations, among the several States, or with the Indian Tribes. Regulation is intended to provide fair treatment, not hindrance.
Article I.
SECTION. 8.
The Congress shall have Power [Dashed bullets mine]
— To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
— To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;
— To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;
— To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;
— To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;
— To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;
— To establish Post Offices and post Roads;
— To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;
— To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;
— To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations;
— To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;
— To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;
— To provide and maintain a Navy;
— To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;
— To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;
— To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;
— To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as
may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards and other needful Buildings;
-And
— To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.
The FAA to SpaceX “Nice company you got here.
Sure would be a shame if something happened to it.”
Every company we know of has been asked to choose sides, you’re either with us? or against us! Choose wrong and you will be destroyed.
Become a private/public partnership… A stockholder with limited voting rights. Or when the change comes you’re on your own.
The topic of money has been brought up several times in this thread, we instinctively know it’s at the root of this issue. We have the billionaires who received their money from contracts with the government like Gates, Bezos, and others. And then there’s the self-made billionaires who don’t want be controlled.
This election is essentially “The People’s” choice of the “new masters”… the oligarchs with their puppets? Or the billionaires who can afford to say no.
Trump, Elon and those who wished to keep their freedom and make their own decisions are appealing to the public for support.
The money system is collapsing, and so will their wealth and with it, the freedom of choice. For us all.
For example, Putin had his meeting with his security council recently and can you guess what they talked about? Not Ukraine, not the escalation of hostilities with NATO and United States, not the Middle East, they talked about how to “stabilize the currency” to promote trade within the bricks nations when the western money system collapses.
This was more important than anything else facing their nation!
Congress/Federal reserve is printing $1 trillion every hundred days, the National debt now surpasses all savings. The price of everything is going up to adjust for the fallen dollar which will soon be worthless.
State Street and Vanguard have been siphoning money out of Black rock as black rock goes into bankruptcy with the majority of 401(k)’s and retirement accounts.
What is the missing clue to this conundrum? How will the freedom loving billionaires fight when their money no longer has any meaning?
Here’s a 14 minute explanation of what’s coming to give you a different point of view, including a short explanation on how Elon musk “used to be one of them” taking money in loans from the government in exchange for licenses… and now has the power and the desire to deny them but it will cost him. what was Twitter, $40 billion? to maintain an outlet for free speech? CBDC programmable money.
https://youtu.be/3capKnik0Lc?si=coY19MckgVNwtckN
He and Trump are gambling on the American people to rise up and take back their freedom. It’s all or nothing, his last chance to have the freedom to do what he wants with his money or they will take it all away from him/us. Just as they’re doing to that billionaire when he landed in France.
This is how the dark age begins… then comes the burning of the witches who do not conform.