To read this post please scroll down.

 

Readers!

 

My July fund-raising campaign to celebrate the fifteenth anniversary since I began Behind the Black is now over. I want to thank all those who so generously donated or subscribed, especially those who have become regular supporters. I can't do this without your help. I also find it increasingly hard to express how much your support means to me. God bless you all!

 

The donations during this year's campaign were sadly less than previous years, but for this I blame myself. I am tired of begging for money, and so I put up the campaign announcement at the start of the month but had no desire to update it weekly to encourage more donations, as I have done in past years. This lack of begging likely contributed to the drop in donations.

 

No matter. I am here, and here I intend to stay. If you like what I do and have not yet donated or subscribed, please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are four ways of doing so:

 

1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.

 

2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
 

3. A Paypal Donation or subscription:

 

4. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.


SpaceX: Starship will be going to the Moon, with or without NASA

Artist's rending of Starships on the Moon
SpaceX’s artist’s rending of Starships on the Moon.
Click for original.

In what appears to be a direct response to the claim by NASA’s interim administrator Sean Duffy that SpaceX is “behind” in developing a manned lunar lander version of Starship, SpaceX today posted a detailed update of the status that project, noting pointedly the following in the update’s conclusion:

NASA selected Starship in 2021 to serve as the lander for the Artemis III mission and return humans to the Moon for the first time since Apollo. That selection was made through fair and open competition which determined that SpaceX’s bid utilizing Starship had the highest technical and management ratings while being the lowest cost by a wide margin. This was followed by a second selection [Blue Origin’s Blue Moon lander] to serve as the lander for Artemis IV, moving beyond initial demonstrations to lay the groundwork that will ensure that humanity’s return to the Moon is permanent.

Starship continues to simultaneously be the fastest path to returning humans to the surface of the Moon and a core enabler of the Artemis program’s goal to establish a permanent, sustainable presence on the lunar surface. SpaceX shares the goal of returning to the Moon as expeditiously as possible, approaching the mission with the same alacrity and commitment that returned human spaceflight capability to America under NASA’s Commercial Crew program.

The update then provides a list of the testing and engineering work that SpaceX has been doing on the Starship lunar lander, including full scale drop tests simulating lunar gravity, qualification of the docking ports, and the construction of a full scale mock-up of the Starship cabin to test its systems.

A close list of the work done is actually not that impressive, but at the same time this is not surprising. SpaceX is now mostly focused on getting Starship into orbit, proving it can be refueled there, and proving it can fly for long enough to get to the Moon. This part of the update was most exciting, as it confirms what I have suspected for next year’s flight program:

Two Starships about to dock for refueling
Screen capture from animation showing two Starships
about to dock for refueling. Click for original video.

The next major flight milestones tied specifically to HLS [Human Landing System] will be a long-duration flight test and the in-space propellant transfer flight test. The exact timing will be driven by how upcoming flight tests debuting the new Starship V3 [version 3] architecture progress, but both of these tests are targeted to take place in 2026. On-orbit refilling enables Starship to complete the Artemis lunar mission architecture and carry up to 100 tons directly to the lunar surface, providing the capability to carry rovers, habitats, and other payloads needed to establish a permanent, and sustainable, presence on the Moon.

It will start with a Starship launched from Starbase to spend an extended time on orbit, gathering data on vehicle propulsion and thermal behavior on an extended duration mission, including long duration propellant storage and boil-off characterization. A second Starship will then launch to rendezvous with the first to demonstrate ship-to-ship propellant transfer in Earth orbit.

If all goes well, expect that long two-week two-launch mission to occur sometime in the middle or second half of next year.

Once these milestones are achieved expect SpaceX to quickly ramp up its work on the Starship Moon lander. Based on this update, that ramp up will not be hard, because most of the preparatory work has begun.

The most important take-away from SpaceX’s update however is this: The company made it clear that it sees Starship and Superheavy as its own space effort, irrelevant of NASA.

To return Americans to the Moon, SpaceX aligned Starship development along two paths: development of the core Starship system and supporting infrastructure, including production facilities, test facilities, and launch sites — which SpaceX is self-funding representing over 90% of system costs — and development of the HLS-specific Starship configuration, which leverages and modifies the core vehicle capability to support NASA’s requirements for landing crew on and returning them from the Moon. SpaceX is working under a fixed-price contract with NASA, ensuring that the company is only paid after the successful completion of progress milestones, and American taxpayers are not on the hook for increased SpaceX costs. SpaceX provides significant insight to NASA at every stage of the development process along both paths, including access to flight data from missions not funded under the HLS contract.

May it always wave free!

Both pathways are necessary and made possible by SpaceX’s substantial self-investments to enable the high-rate production, launch, and test of Starship for missions to the Moon and other purposes. Starship will bring the United States back to the Moon before any other nation and it will enable sustainable lunar operations by being fully and rapidly reusable, cost-effective, and capable of high frequency lunar missions with more than 100 tons of cargo capacity.

In other words, SpaceX is going to land this spaceship manned on the Moon, whether or not NASA’s SLS and Orion are ready. And even if those expensive, cumbersome, and poorly designed boondoggles are ready for those first two Artemis landings, SpaceX is likely to quickly outmatch them with numerous other private missions to the Moon, outside of NASA. It has the funds to do it, and it knows it has the customers willing to buy the flights.

All hail the American dream!

Genesis cover

On Christmas Eve 1968 three Americans became the first humans to visit another world. What they did to celebrate was unexpected and profound, and will be remembered throughout all human history. Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8, Robert Zimmerman's classic history of humanity's first journey to another world, tells that story, and it is now available as both an ebook and an audiobook, both with a foreword by Valerie Anders and a new introduction by Robert Zimmerman.

 

The print edition can be purchased at Amazon or from any other book seller. If you want an autographed copy the price is $60 for the hardback and $45 for the paperback, plus $8 shipping for each. Go here for purchasing details. The ebook is available everywhere for $5.99 (before discount) at amazon, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. If you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and the author gets a bigger cut much sooner.


The audiobook is also available at all these vendors, and is also free with a 30-day trial membership to Audible.
 

"Not simply about one mission, [Genesis] is also the history of America's quest for the moon... Zimmerman has done a masterful job of tying disparate events together into a solid account of one of America's greatest human triumphs."--San Antonio Express-News

11 comments

  • Richard M

    There’s another bit of a jab at NASA in there, too, if you look at the end of the press release:

    “Since the contract was awarded, we have been consistently responsive to NASA as requirements for Artemis III have changed and have shared ideas on how to simplify the mission to align with national priorities.”

    Wondering now just exactly what all those requirement changes NASA made were.

    And I agree, Bob: “In other words, SpaceX is going to land this spaceship manned on the Moon, whether or not NASA’s SLS and Orion are ready. ” I think it’s a point of pride for Elon now.

  • Rocket J Squirrel

    The usual suspects in congress and the bureaucracy will have hissy fit claiming that SpaceX needs a ‘license’ to go/land on the moon. They might even say the UN needs to give permission.

  • Richard M

    In a related development, former NASA administrators Charlie Bolden and Jim Bridenstine showed up at the AAU symposium yesterday to criticize the reliance on Starship, because they don’t think it can get there before the Chinese.

    Bridenstine concedes that Starship has potential in the long run, is in full freak out mode over beating China back. He even one-up’s what Duffy is trying to do, urging that the administration invoke the Defense Production Act, to go “all-in to build a landing system as quickly as possible.” Jim, of course, is now a lobbyist for United Launch Alliance as well as the National Security Space Association, which basically networks DoD with Old Space contractors. Fair to ask the old question, “cui bono?”

    OTOH, it’s a little hard to make out what Bolden, who was skeptical of Kathy Lueders awarding the HLS contract to SpaceX in 2021, thinks of Starship HLS *now*, but he did say something more sensible than Bridenstine did: “We may not make 2030 and that’s ok with me, as long as we get there in 2031 better than they are with what they have there.” Bolden appears to be fully retired, not lobbying for anyone.

    https://spacenews.com/former-nasa-administrators-call-for-changes-in-artemis-lunar-lander-architecture/

  • David Ross

    NASA is for constituent service. SpaceX is for delivering cargo.
    This is a move by SpaceX toward the Pentagon and away from whatever it is Duffy, Isaacson, and Cruz are futzing around with.

  • Timberwind

    If they need a license to land on the Moon, I’ll grant them one, ala Ron Swanson.

  • Jeff Wright

    The stretch LM from MOON ZERO TWO is one of the more realistic of fictional Lunar Landers.
    http://www.tobor2.com/MoonZeroTwo/MZ2.htm
    http://www.davidsissonmodels.co.uk/Moon%20Zero%20Two%20Part%201.htm
    Hypergolics can keep for years—something very like this with modern tech is needed.

    Elon should not be required to have a license–he just needs a Starship to not come apart on landing.

  • Patrick Underwood

    “This was followed by a second selection [Blue Origin’s Blue Moon lander] to serve as the lander for Artemis IV, moving beyond initial demonstrations to lay the groundwork that will ensure that humanity’s return to the Moon is permanent.”

    I think they are referring to the Option B (new&improved! upgraded) Starship lander here, not the BO lander. But I could be wrong.

  • wayne

    Question:
    -I’m unclear on how this will physically land on the Moon and deal with all the blow-back. Is that a concern or what?
    -And, what happens if it tips over?

    Bugs Bunny
    “Haredevil Hare” (1948)
    https://youtu.be/FD79Bb1F6X8
    ( intro clip; 2:28)

  • Patrick Underwood

    Richard M: I would love to read the SpaceNews article, but I just refuse to play their little game. It’s okay; was already tiring of their slant.

  • Patrick Underwood: FYI, Space News stopped forcing people to register to read its stuff about a month ago. I suspect they discovered it only drove all their traffic away.

    That was all right with me. I have seen a corresponding increase of traffic here. I think their foolishness helped me. :)

  • Patrick Underwood

    Hmm, I’m still getting the wall on at least some articles. But like I said, that’s okay!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *