To read this post please scroll down.

 

Readers! A November fund-raising drive!

 

It is unfortunately time for another November fund-raising campaign to support my work here at Behind the Black. I really dislike doing these, but 2025 is so far turning out to be a very poor year for donations and subscriptions, the worst since 2020. I very much need your support for this webpage to survive.

 

And I think I provide real value. Fifteen years ago I said SLS was garbage and should be cancelled. Almost a decade ago I said Orion was a lie and a bad idea. As early as 1998, long before almost anyone else, I predicted in my first book, Genesis: The Story of Apollo 8, that private enterprise and freedom would conquer the solar system, not government. Very early in the COVID panic and continuing throughout I noted that every policy put forth by the government (masks, social distancing, lockdowns, jab mandates) was wrong, misguided, and did more harm than good. In planetary science, while everyone else in the media still thinks Mars has no water, I have been reporting the real results from the orbiters now for more than five years, that Mars is in fact a planet largely covered with ice.

 

I could continue with numerous other examples. If you want to know what others will discover a decade hence, read what I write here at Behind the Black. And if you read my most recent book, Conscious Choice, you will find out what is going to happen in space in the next century.

 

 

This last claim might sound like hubris on my part, but I base it on my overall track record.

 

So please consider donating or subscribing to Behind the Black, either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. I could really use the support at this time. There are five ways of doing so:

 

1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.

 

2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation. Takes about a 10% cut.
 

3. A Paypal Donation or subscription, which takes about a 15% cut:

 

4. Donate by check. I get whatever you donate. Make the check payable to Robert Zimmerman and mail it to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.


Tenth Starship/Superheavy launch scrubbed due to ground equipment issue

SpaceX today scrubbed the tenth orbital test launch of its Starship/Superheavy rocket due to an issue with ground equipment,

The launch has been rescheduled for August 25, 2025, with a launch window opening at 6:30 pm (Central), Live stream here.

Genesis cover

On Christmas Eve 1968 three Americans became the first humans to visit another world. What they did to celebrate was unexpected and profound, and will be remembered throughout all human history. Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8, Robert Zimmerman's classic history of humanity's first journey to another world, tells that story, and it is now available as both an ebook and an audiobook, both with a foreword by Valerie Anders and a new introduction by Robert Zimmerman.

 

The print edition can be purchased at Amazon or from any other book seller. If you want an autographed copy the price is $60 for the hardback and $45 for the paperback, plus $8 shipping for each. Go here for purchasing details. The ebook is available everywhere for $5.99 (before discount) at amazon, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. If you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and the author gets a bigger cut much sooner.


The audiobook is also available at all these vendors, and is also free with a 30-day trial membership to Audible.
 

"Not simply about one mission, [Genesis] is also the history of America's quest for the moon... Zimmerman has done a masterful job of tying disparate events together into a solid account of one of America's greatest human triumphs."--San Antonio Express-News

13 comments

  • Jeff Wright

    With the milkstool having been modified into an ersatz static test stand—what with hold-downs aplenty—it might be that they wanted to make double sure there wasn’t a snag.

    “Billy-Bob? You did remove all the tie-downs, right?”

    “Yeah yeah…sure-sure…..zzzzzz”
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZiYXBbqKjPU

  • pzatchok

    This also throws off any boat protesters trying to get onto the exclusion zone.

  • Steve Richter

    From Grok: “Posts on X further specify that the leak was identified in the LOX fill/drain flex hose on the SQD arm, which connects the launch tower to the Starship upper stage for propellant loading. Crews replaced the faulty flex hose overnight, targeting a launch attempt on Monday, August 25, 2025. ”

    These failures are worrying in that once Starship is in LEO there is very little room for error involving leaking fuel pipes or any other sort of problem.

  • Mike Borgelt

    “These failures are worrying” . Not at all. They are finding out what can go wrong and fixing it so it doesn’t happen again.
    Nobody has built a fully reusable two stage orbital rocket before so the whole program is highly experimental. They have made good progress so far, including exploring the boundaries of the envelope.

  • Dick Eagleson

    The part that was leaking was staying on the ground, not going to orbit.

  • Edward

    Steve Richter,
    You wrote: “These failures are worrying in that once Starship is in LEO there is very little room for error involving leaking fuel pipes or any other sort of problem.

    Fortunately, this leak was on the ground equipment, not the flight hardware. However, a leak on test 9’s flight hardware was responsible for its loss of control, the subsequent cancellation of the engine relight test, the test of the “Pez” satellite dispenser, and the failed reentry.

    One of Musk’s philosophies is: the best part is no part. This is why each Raptor engine iteration has fewer parts. A corollary to that philosophy is: if you don’t have to add parts back on, then you didn’t remove enough parts. It is his way of finding the optimum parts needed for success. Flight 6 was fairly successful, so the losses of the past three flights are due to the version 2 (block 2) redesign, so clearly they have taken off too many parts and made the rocket not as successful. Putting parts back on is their way of finding the optimum. It may be taking extra time, but it is making a better Starship for future use.

  • John

    Gary do not quit your day job.

  • Jeff Wright

    Another scrub.

    R-7 took lightning strikes—sat and burned….but a diaphanous anvil cloud scares Boca.

  • Gary

    John,

    ;)

    At 10 this morning, things looked great!

  • Steve Richter

    “… Not at all. They are finding out what can go wrong and fixing it so it doesn’t happen again. …”

    ok. So the part that failed this time was the hose/pipe through which LOX flows into Starship. Doesn’t it make sense to test that part in isolation? Pump LOX into a Starship size tank every day until it fails? What do I know.

    The thing that is really worrying is that Starship eventually gets into LEO. At which time Starship is refueled by multiple tanker ships and the engines are ignited again so that the ship can travel to Mars. That exposes a whole new set of not yet tested parts. But an explosive failure while in orbit will be unprecedented and how destructive? Starship might not be permitted to ever fly again.

  • Dick Eagleson

    Jeff Wright,

    Apollo 12’s Saturn 5 took lightning strikes going uphill too. That doesn’t make it something one should wish to do if avoidable.

    The US is fortunate that its busiest spaceport is below 30 degrees north latitude and none of the others are above 37 degrees north latitude. The Russkies pretty much have to be able to launch in crummier weather because they get a lot more of it given that all of their spaceports are located above 45 degrees north latitude. Vostochny is in Siberia above 51 degrees north latitude. Plesetsk is above 62 degrees north latitude – within spitting distance of the Arctic Circle.

    The way things are currently going in Russia, though, launch weather is looking to be pretty well in freefall down the list of priority concerns. And once Russia dies, of course, it won’t be launching any more rockets anyway regardless of weather.

  • Jeff Wright

    Looks like they turned the corner with block 2

    Was that a range safety charge that cooked off?
    Landing burn was fine.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *