The decision on manned spaceflight
The rumors are swirling. Today alone the news included three different articles about NASA’s upcoming decision to down-select to either one or two in its manned commercial crew program.
- Is this the space vehicle that will be NASA’s alternative to Russia’s ‘taxi service’ to orbit?
- First Class or Economy?—NASA’s countdown in the new space race [subscription required]
- Decision on commercial crew program likely to be made after Labor Day weekend
The third article above speculates that the decision will be made shortly after this weekend, maybe as soon as next week. It also outlines in nice detail the companies who are competing for the contract.
I strongly expect NASA to pick two companies, not one, as the agency has repeatedly said it wants to have redundancy and competition in manned space flight. To this I agree whole-heartedly. Right now, if I was a betting man (which I am not), I would pick SpaceX and Sierra Nevada as the two companies to get the nod.
If NASA only picks one company that I don’t think there is much doubt that it will be SpaceX.
And then again, government agencies, because of politics, have sometimes made some incredibly stupid decisions. For example, back in the 1970s the company that proposed the space shuttle was rejected for another big space company that had more political clout, which then turned around and essentially stole the first company’s designs to build the space shuttle from them. It just took longer and cost more.
Readers!
Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. Your support allows me the freedom and ability to analyze objectively the ongoing renaissance in space, as well as the cultural changes -- for good or ill -- that are happening across America. Fourteen years ago I wrote that SLS and Orion were a bad ideas, a waste of money, would be years behind schedule, and better replaced by commercial private enterprise. Only now does it appear that Washington might finally recognize this reality.
In 2020 when the world panicked over COVID I wrote that the panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Only in the past year have some of our so-called experts in the health field have begun to recognize these facts.
Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.
You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are four ways of doing so:
1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.
2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
3. A Paypal Donation or subscription:
4. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652
You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.
Don’t think those of us here on the Dream Chaser and Boeing teams arnt stressing.
>..And then again, government agencies, because of politics, have sometimes made some incredibly stupid decisions.
> For example, back in the 1970s the company that proposed the space shuttle was rejected for another big space
> company that had more political clout, which then turned around and essentially stole the first company’s designs
> to build the space shuttle from them.
Actually it was worse then that. NASA handed both Grumman’s orbiter design info, and Pratts main engine info, to Rockwell (and their rocketdyne subdivision) to replicate at a higher bid cost then the original companies.
Interestingly (according to a former P&W exec in charge of their rocket engine group) not for the bigger clout of Rockwell – but because Grumman and P&W had big other contracts they were going to make far more money on absorbing their execs attention, and NASA execs were nervous about not getting the fawning attention they expected. Some of them were still the old transplanted Nazis who remembered being ignored (snubed) by most of the industry, but getting along fine with Rockwell.
;/
> NASA handed both Grumman’s orbiter design info, and Pratts main engine info, to Rockwell (and their rocketdyne subdivision) to replicate
My training at one company contained intellectual property (IP) protection. Among the many lessons was a warning that including in bids and proposals any company-proprietary IP could result in the government treating it as government property rather than company property, and the legal department absolutely had to be consulted before even mentioning it in any proposal.
These seem to be examples of companies innocently losing control of their own property. Maybe these examples are *why* that lesson was in the training.
I remember this not being considered the company mistakenly losing control. Though the gov does sometimes choose at their discretion to declare company info as public info.
In any event, sueing them for breaking the law or their agreements seldom works out well for the suer.