To read this post please scroll down.

 

Readers! A November fund-raising drive!

 

It is unfortunately time for another November fund-raising campaign to support my work here at Behind the Black. I really dislike doing these, but 2025 is so far turning out to be a very poor year for donations and subscriptions, the worst since 2020. I very much need your support for this webpage to survive.

 

And I think I provide real value. Fifteen years ago I said SLS was garbage and should be cancelled. Almost a decade ago I said Orion was a lie and a bad idea. As early as 1998, long before almost anyone else, I predicted in my first book, Genesis: The Story of Apollo 8, that private enterprise and freedom would conquer the solar system, not government. Very early in the COVID panic and continuing throughout I noted that every policy put forth by the government (masks, social distancing, lockdowns, jab mandates) was wrong, misguided, and did more harm than good. In planetary science, while everyone else in the media still thinks Mars has no water, I have been reporting the real results from the orbiters now for more than five years, that Mars is in fact a planet largely covered with ice.

 

I could continue with numerous other examples. If you want to know what others will discover a decade hence, read what I write here at Behind the Black. And if you read my most recent book, Conscious Choice, you will find out what is going to happen in space in the next century.

 

 

This last claim might sound like hubris on my part, but I base it on my overall track record.

 

So please consider donating or subscribing to Behind the Black, either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. I could really use the support at this time. There are five ways of doing so:

 

1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.

 

2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation. Takes about a 10% cut.
 

3. A Paypal Donation or subscription, which takes about a 15% cut:

 

4. Donate by check. I get whatever you donate. Make the check payable to Robert Zimmerman and mail it to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.


Bridenstine’s visit to SpaceX a non-story

Link here. Essentially he just reiterated his desire to have the private capsules being built by SpaceX and Boeing flying by early next year.

Essentially, the announcements in the last few days by Musk and Boeing about their upcoming testing and launch schedule for both Dragon and Starliner respectively took the steam out of his SpaceX visit.

In fact, I wonder what the politics were behind this. It is almost as if both companies wanted to take the steam out of his appearance here. Most intriguing.

Genesis cover

On Christmas Eve 1968 three Americans became the first humans to visit another world. What they did to celebrate was unexpected and profound, and will be remembered throughout all human history. Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8, Robert Zimmerman's classic history of humanity's first journey to another world, tells that story, and it is now available as both an ebook and an audiobook, both with a foreword by Valerie Anders and a new introduction by Robert Zimmerman.

 

The print edition can be purchased at Amazon or from any other book seller. If you want an autographed copy the price is $60 for the hardback and $45 for the paperback, plus $8 shipping for each. Go here for purchasing details. The ebook is available everywhere for $5.99 (before discount) at amazon, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. If you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and the author gets a bigger cut much sooner.


The audiobook is also available at all these vendors, and is also free with a 30-day trial membership to Audible.
 

"Not simply about one mission, [Genesis] is also the history of America's quest for the moon... Zimmerman has done a masterful job of tying disparate events together into a solid account of one of America's greatest human triumphs."--San Antonio Express-News

7 comments

  • Scott M.

    Bob, do you think it could be a bit of PR by NASA to smooth over that odd tweet before the Starship presentation? Effectively trying to show the press that “Nah, we’re all buddies here! Things are going great!”

    I agree that the presentation was pretty much a nothingburger. I was hoping to get some firm dates for the first manned missions, but I guess that’s asking for too much :)

  • Matthew Straney

    I got a laugh of the picture of Jim B. sitting in the doorway of the Dragon Capsule, after 4 + years of development of the Dragon Capsule how many times do you think hes been shown that part of the ship? Probably not many new things to see from that angle.

  • David K

    In a decade or two, I suspect that NASA will stand for the national astronomical science academy and will continue with space science and nothing else. Everything else will be either commercial or part of military space endeavors.

  • Patrick Underwood

    I didn’t have the negative reaction you guys did. Bridenstine really gets it about commercial space; he wrote on the subject prior to becoming Administrator. I didn’t like–and don’t understand–the tweet either, but then I’ve seen a few tweets from my man Musk that are truly repellent. Bridenstine seems the most pro-commercial Administrator there’s been. Certainly better than “I’m not a big fan of commercial investment in large launch vehicles” Charles Bolden.

    He spoke in support of Starship, and even brought up the fact of early underfunding of Commercial Crew by Congress.

    He floated the idea of flying Orion on FH, and almost got his head handed to him for that transgression. He’s politically out-gunned by Richard Shelby, who is the de facto King of NASA and, as they like to say these days, “make no mistake.”

  • Mike Borgelt

    There’s the NASA administrator looking at a SpaceX capsule. Meanwhile in Boca Chica the same company is building the first magnificent real spaceship. Everything else has been capsules or spaceplanes. LOL!

  • Patrick Underwood

    Over on NSF, the most hilarious take I’ve seen so far:

    “A curious meeting between the leader of the nation’s space program and the NASA guy.”

  • Edward

    Considering that the visit was prompted by a comment by Bridenstine implying that SpaceX was taking too long to deliver astronauts to the ISS, it sounds to me as though the purpose of the visit was to reassure the public and SpaceX workers that the company is not falling down on the job.

    I once worked in a solar astrophysics department of a company. When a new division head was assigned, he made an off the cuff comment that maybe the company should not be involved in counting sunspots. That division head did not last many more days, and his successor had to come around to my department to apologize for the comment. We were involved in sunspot-associated phenomena, and the number of sunspots was a byproduct; we also studied a number of other mysterious and interesting phenomena about the sun, often using space based x-ray telescopes.

    Bridenstine did something similar, and for political reasons he had to take a valuable day out of his schedule to make similar amends. It isn’t only presidents who have to be careful of what they say.

    The article said that “SpaceX was only devoting about 5 percent of the company’s resources on the new launch system and that Crew Dragon remains the California rocket builder’s top priority.

    ‘Only five percent’ makes it sound as though a company that has many irons in the fire should be devoting more resources to a project with its developmental testing winding down and its operations not yet started. I’ll bet that Boeing has far, far less than five percent of its resources going toward Starliner, but I would not even think of suggesting that this means Boeing is not properly focused on its manned Starliner.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *