Scroll down to read this post.

 

Genesis cover

On Christmas Eve 1968 three Americans became the first humans to visit another world. What they did to celebrate was unexpected and profound, and will be remembered throughout all human history. Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8, Robert Zimmerman's classic history of humanity's first journey to another world, tells that story, and it is now available as both an ebook and an audiobook, both with a foreword by Valerie Anders and a new introduction by Robert Zimmerman.

 

The print edition can be purchased at Amazon. from any other book seller, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. The ebook is available everywhere for $5.99 (before discount) at amazon, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. If you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and the author gets a bigger cut much sooner.


The audiobook is also available at all these vendors, and is also free with a 30-day trial membership to Audible.
 

"Not simply about one mission, [Genesis] is also the history of America's quest for the moon... Zimmerman has done a masterful job of tying disparate events together into a solid account of one of America's greatest human triumphs."--San Antonio Express-News


Colorado’s new gun control law has forced police to steal a woman’s pistol.

Colorado’s new gun control law has forced police there to steal a woman’s pistol.

They appear to want to return it, but the law has created a situation where they can’t return it legally.

Readers!

 

Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. Your support allows me the freedom and ability to analyze objectively the ongoing renaissance in space, as well as the cultural changes -- for good or ill -- that are happening across America. Fourteen years ago I wrote that SLS and Orion were a bad ideas, a waste of money, would be years behind schedule, and better replaced by commercial private enterprise. Only now does it appear that Washington might finally recognize this reality.

 

In 2020 when the world panicked over COVID I wrote that the panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Only in the past year have some of our so-called experts in the health field have begun to recognize these facts.

 

Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.

 

You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are four ways of doing so:

 

1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.

 

2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
 

3. A Paypal Donation or subscription:

 

4. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.

6 comments

  • Pzatchok

    I can understand the need for a background check when they return a firearm to its owner.

    No one wants them to hand over a gun to someone who can’t pass the check. (since the check is law in that state)

    But when the law was proposed and passed the idiot law makers instead of dancing around all smug and happy they passed another ‘safety’ law. (into gun law) they knew some people would be getting their guns back, it always happens and has has happened since guns were invented. And since they knew some would be getting them back they should have added in a way to pay for the back ground checks.

    They knew if that if they had added in a statement that the gun owner should pay they would have never passed the law. And if they stated that the county pay the counties would sue to make the state pay since its a state law.

    Considering that the agent at the check station is an already paid for federal employee they or their office don’t need paid for. The only person getting any fee is the guy with the FFL phoning it in.

  • Edward

    Apparently I don’t understand Colorado’s law. She already passed a background check in order to get the gun in the first place. Background check performed and passed.

    Are the Colorado legislators really as stupid as this article makes them seem, that at the time a gun changes hands (even to its previously checked owner, or a previously checked repairman, or … ) a background check is necessary? If that is so, it is clear that the officer that confiscated the gun (and that is what it turned out to be, whatever the intention) would also need such a background check, and that obviously was not performed, because the police department does not have anyone to perform it.

    If it is against the law to return the gun, then it must have also been against the law for the officer to take it.

    What about SWAT teams arming themselves from the armory? Or an officer disarming a bad-guy? Both of these situations require quick action, not delayed action.

  • Pzatchok

    The problem in reality is that a person could have never went through a back ground check to get the gun in the first place.

    Either by private person to person sale or they bought it long before the background check system was law.

    In the mean time they could have preformed any number of crimes that now make it illegal for them to have a gun.

    The cops mainly only check you for outstanding warrants and civil protection orders. Neither of which might keep you from owning a gun.

  • Edward

    So, that means that the answer to my question: “that at the time a gun changes hands a background check is necessary?” is, “yes.”

    Are there exceptions for police officers, SWAT teams, BLM officers, and employees of other government agencies? Otherwise, it would be illegal for them to disarm the public, as they did to poor, unprotected Sara Warren, unless they had a FFL holder at the scene.

  • Pzatchok

    Yes they are the exception.

    The back ground check you go through to get a gun is just a look to see if you are wanted or on a no purchase list.

    Officers of the law tend to go through a far more thorough back ground check at the time they are sworn in. Plus psychological checks.
    But even they go through the general background check when they make a private purchase.

    When they confiscate a weapon is in the name of the department and under the orders of the prosecutor for their area.
    They in effect are acting under your orders and on your(as a citizen) behalf.

  • Edward

    My question was not so rhetorical.

    New York stupidly forgot to exempt police officers from the 7-round magazine law, so their officers could not legally have more than 7 rounds in their guns. That left them less armed than the law breakers. Eventually, somebody noticed how stupid the NY legislature is, and they fixed it. Since the smart people go into business, the average people go into science (ironic to think that the PhDs are only average), and the stupid people go into politics (which explains a lot), I just want to make sure that there are some quality assurance programs in our legislatures.

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *