To read this post please scroll down.

 

Readers! A November fund-raising drive!

 

It is unfortunately time for another November fund-raising campaign to support my work here at Behind the Black. I really dislike doing these, but 2025 is so far turning out to be a very poor year for donations and subscriptions, the worst since 2020. I very much need your support for this webpage to survive.

 

And I think I provide real value. Fifteen years ago I said SLS was garbage and should be cancelled. Almost a decade ago I said Orion was a lie and a bad idea. As early as 1998, long before almost anyone else, I predicted in my first book, Genesis: The Story of Apollo 8, that private enterprise and freedom would conquer the solar system, not government. Very early in the COVID panic and continuing throughout I noted that every policy put forth by the government (masks, social distancing, lockdowns, jab mandates) was wrong, misguided, and did more harm than good. In planetary science, while everyone else in the media still thinks Mars has no water, I have been reporting the real results from the orbiters now for more than five years, that Mars is in fact a planet largely covered with ice.

 

I could continue with numerous other examples. If you want to know what others will discover a decade hence, read what I write here at Behind the Black. And if you read my most recent book, Conscious Choice, you will find out what is going to happen in space in the next century.

 

 

This last claim might sound like hubris on my part, but I base it on my overall track record.

 

So please consider donating or subscribing to Behind the Black, either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. I could really use the support at this time. There are five ways of doing so:

 

1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.

 

2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation. Takes about a 10% cut.
 

3. A Paypal Donation or subscription, which takes about a 15% cut:

 

4. Donate by check. I get whatever you donate. Make the check payable to Robert Zimmerman and mail it to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.


Falcon Heavy static fire test delayed again

It appears that the first static fire test of the Falcon Heavy has been delayed again from today to later in the week.

There is no word on why the delay, but all indications suggest that they are going through the process step-by-step with great care. As they find things that need addressing they are addressing them, and that only when all issues are resolved will they go forward.

Genesis cover

On Christmas Eve 1968 three Americans became the first humans to visit another world. What they did to celebrate was unexpected and profound, and will be remembered throughout all human history. Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8, Robert Zimmerman's classic history of humanity's first journey to another world, tells that story, and it is now available as both an ebook and an audiobook, both with a foreword by Valerie Anders and a new introduction by Robert Zimmerman.

 

The print edition can be purchased at Amazon or from any other book seller. If you want an autographed copy the price is $60 for the hardback and $45 for the paperback, plus $8 shipping for each. Go here for purchasing details. The ebook is available everywhere for $5.99 (before discount) at amazon, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. If you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and the author gets a bigger cut much sooner.


The audiobook is also available at all these vendors, and is also free with a 30-day trial membership to Audible.
 

"Not simply about one mission, [Genesis] is also the history of America's quest for the moon... Zimmerman has done a masterful job of tying disparate events together into a solid account of one of America's greatest human triumphs."--San Antonio Express-News

7 comments

  • ken anthony

    Probably shouldn’t speculate but I’m guessing it’s a software issue related to the ignition firing sequence? Or something else completely different (weaseling!)

    They got 27 engines that all need to be able to shut down in less than a second if some sensor tells them so?

  • ken anthony

    Also, each core has it’s own independent electronics that have to talk to the other two cores. It wouldn’t do for some cores to shut down while others keep going.

  • Dick Eagleson

    Slowly, slowly, catchy monkey.

  • Michael

    Again I have found some reasonable comments regarding the Falcon Heavy static fire. I am beginning to appreciate this web site.

    https://www.teslarati.com/whats-causing-spacex-falcon-heavy-delays/

    I have been thinking about ‘go-fever’ and your own money; seems to have a calming effect. But then again this is the first time a whole Falcon Heavy is test fired all up so I do not blame them in sneaking up on the thing with great caution.

    It will fly when it flies and us rubbernecks be darned.

  • Localfluff

    If it blows up on the pad, that would be fantastic fireworks. The Soviet Moon rocket N1 is said to have produced the biggest non-nuclear explosion ever (or up until it happened?) It had a mass of 2800 tons, Falcon Heavy 1400 tons, kerosene in both cases. So from the armchair entertainment perspective it is a win-win. Just push the button! :-)

  • ken anthony

    SpaceX will learn from the proceedings, and they will be better off for it (although maybe less so financially…).

    Let’s see… the financial cost of delay vs. the financial cost of blowing up on the pad. Gee, I wonder which costs more???

    With BFR, they should probably do grasshopper tests before going orbital. Any bets?

  • Edward

    ken anthony asked: “With BFR, they should probably do grasshopper tests before going orbital. Any bets?

    Maybe, and they should have a landing pad built for the first launch, too, so it would be easy to do. However, since they aren’t doing that with Falcon Heavy I will side with “orbit or bust.” Unfortunately, it will take a few years before we know who got it right.

    Michael,
    Thank you for that link. I never did the math before, so I never considered just how much the launch vehicle shrinks due to the thermal contraction from the cold propellants. From the article: “In the case of Falcon 9’s massive 45 meters (150 foot) tall first stage, the scale of this contraction can be on the order of several inches or more

    LOX freezes around 55 Kelvin (-218 C) and kerosene around 233 Kelvin (-40 C). SpaceX is loading these as cold as they can so that it is as dense as possible in order to get the most potential energy into the tanks as possible. The coefficient of thermal expansion for aluminum (probably different for Falcon’s alloy) is around 0.000021 mm per mm per degree K. Since I do not know the length of each of the propellant tanks, I will assume that the LOX tank is twice that of the kerosene tank (it holds over twice the weight of O2 as kerosene) the length of the 45 meter rocket. But first I will subtract off the 5-ish meters of the Merlin engines and their support structure.

    Each tank has two domes, which reduce the length that the tanks are part of the skin of the rocket by about the 3.66 m diameter of the rocket, so the LOX tank is about 24 meters of the rocket’s length. I recall that they share a dome, with insulation, so I removed the dome height only once.

    Assuming that ambient temperature is 300 K (just about room temperature), it looks to me that the LOX shortens the Falcon 9 by about 123 mm and the kerosene by about 17 mm. This is a total of about 5-1/2 inches.

    My guess is that SpaceX is looking very closely at the strains and stresses and the differences between rockets as they load the cold propellants into the three different rockets. These differences may not be the reason for the delays, but they are a potential problem with the cross-supports at the top of the first stage. Loading the propellants evenly may be much more important than I had thought.

    The next question on your mind is: “how much do the diameters of the tanks shrink due to the cold propellants?” For the LOX, 19 mm, and 5 mm for the kerosene tank. That is a stress and strain that needs to be accommodated at the interfaces of the tanks with the rest of the rocket’s skin and structure.

    Ain’t rocketry fun?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *