In reporting on climate change, ABC and CBS have excluded any commentary from any skeptical scientists for literally years.
In reporting on climate change, ABC and CBS have excluded all commentary from any skeptical scientists for literally years.
Neither CBS nor ABC have included a skeptical scientists in their news shows within the past 1,300 days, but both networks included alarmists within the past 160 days — CBS as recently as 22 days ago. When the networks did include other viewpoints, the experts were dismissed as “out of the scientific mainstream” or backed by “oil and coal companies.”
It is almost like these news organizations are closing their eyes and sticking their fingers in their ears and chanting, “La, la, la, la, la, la, la, la…” Not the kind of behavior you’d expect from a legitimate news organization.
Readers!
Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. Your support allows me the freedom and ability to analyze objectively the ongoing renaissance in space, as well as the cultural changes -- for good or ill -- that are happening across America. Fourteen years ago I wrote that SLS and Orion were a bad ideas, a waste of money, would be years behind schedule, and better replaced by commercial private enterprise. Only now does it appear that Washington might finally recognize this reality.
In 2020 when the world panicked over COVID I wrote that the panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Only in the past year have some of our so-called experts in the health field have begun to recognize these facts.
Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.
You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are four ways of doing so:
1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.
2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
3. A Paypal Donation or subscription:
4. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652
You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.
In reporting on climate change, ABC and CBS have excluded all commentary from any skeptical scientists for literally years.
Neither CBS nor ABC have included a skeptical scientists in their news shows within the past 1,300 days, but both networks included alarmists within the past 160 days — CBS as recently as 22 days ago. When the networks did include other viewpoints, the experts were dismissed as “out of the scientific mainstream” or backed by “oil and coal companies.”
It is almost like these news organizations are closing their eyes and sticking their fingers in their ears and chanting, “La, la, la, la, la, la, la, la…” Not the kind of behavior you’d expect from a legitimate news organization.
Readers!
Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. Your support allows me the freedom and ability to analyze objectively the ongoing renaissance in space, as well as the cultural changes -- for good or ill -- that are happening across America. Fourteen years ago I wrote that SLS and Orion were a bad ideas, a waste of money, would be years behind schedule, and better replaced by commercial private enterprise. Only now does it appear that Washington might finally recognize this reality.
In 2020 when the world panicked over COVID I wrote that the panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Only in the past year have some of our so-called experts in the health field have begun to recognize these facts.
Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.
You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are four ways of doing so:
1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.
2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
3. A Paypal Donation or subscription:
4. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652
You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.
Their argument is that because “global warming” or “climate change” what ever moniker it goes by at the moment, is something that transcends science or logic of evidence because its something that they intuitively KNOW is correct and because of that and the immensity of the subject there is no time left to deal with anything that might indicate something less.
They are dealing with the future and established measurement about the past do not indicate (in their minds) what similar conditions in the future will or may be. Thats the beauty of the whole thing, they are not burdened with extrapolating the known, they can deal in the unknown and anything is possible in that world.
Its perfect and hard to counter act. And I am not saying that humans should not be aware of what effects they have on their environment, they certainly should and they should constantly strive to mitigate any abuses (pollution).
Re: Not the kind of behavior you’d expect from a legitimate news organization – my problem is, ABC, NBC, See-BS, MSNBC, CNN, et al, stopped being legitimate news organizations a long time ago. I agree – no LEGITIMATE News org would do this – but they aren’t legitimate & haven’t been for many, many years now. They are more in the mold of the old Soviet gov’t-controlled propaganda mouthpieces, Tass & Pravda – only worse ! ! Worse, you say?? How so? Because at least most Soviet citizens were aware they were being fed propaganda & discounted much of it, but the majority of Americans are unaware that a supposedly “free and independent” media has a definite agenda & supports a particular (Socialist) viewpoint, and therefore, believe just about everything they’re told! When I’ve tried to point this out to some folks, they’re incredulous – “Why would they LIE?”. I find that to be FAR more dangerous than something generally known & recognized as propaganda. Hand in hand with this, many observers have correctly pointed out that the Environmental/Green/GloBULL Warming movement is, at its core, Socialist, anti-Capitalist, anti-religious, anti-human and anti-American…
It is all about $$$$$$$$$$$. Taxpayer $$$$$$$$$$$$ The ‘media’ is in it as well.
http://a-sceptical-mind.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Comparison-charts.jpg
I totally concur!