To read this post please scroll down.

 

Readers!

 

It is now July, time once again to celebrate the start of this webpage in 2010 with my annual July fund-raising campaign.

 

This year I celebrate the fifteenth anniversary since I began Behind the Black. During that time I have done more than 33,000 posts, mostly covering the global space industry and the related planetary and astronomical science that comes from it. Along the way I have also felt compelled as a free American citizen to regularly post my thoughts on the politics and culture of the time, partly because I think it is important for free Americans to do so, and partly because those politics and that culture have a direct impact on the future of our civilization and its on-going efforts to explore and eventually colonize the solar system.

 

You can’t understand one without understanding the other.

 

Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent independent analysis you don’t find elsewhere. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn’t influenced by donations by established companies or political movements. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.

 

You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are four ways of doing so:

 

1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.

 

2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
 

3. A Paypal Donation or subscription:

 

4. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.


July 2, 2025 Quick space links

Courtesy of BtB’s stringer Jay, as well as reader Gary for the last link. This post is also an open thread. I welcome my readers to post any comments or additional links relating to any space issues, even if unrelated to the links below.

  • New geometry discovery could stop lunar landers from falling over
    This is the stupid-story-of-the-day. A lot of news outlets have picked it up, but it only takes a nano-second of thought to realize this is hardly a solution to keep lunar landers from tipping over. It is far too complicated a solution to what is really a very simple problem: extend the legs out more and keep the center of gravity low.

Genesis cover

On Christmas Eve 1968 three Americans became the first humans to visit another world. What they did to celebrate was unexpected and profound, and will be remembered throughout all human history. Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8, Robert Zimmerman's classic history of humanity's first journey to another world, tells that story, and it is now available as both an ebook and an audiobook, both with a foreword by Valerie Anders and a new introduction by Robert Zimmerman.

 

The print edition can be purchased at Amazon. from any other book seller, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. The ebook is available everywhere for $5.99 (before discount) at amazon, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. If you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and the author gets a bigger cut much sooner.


The audiobook is also available at all these vendors, and is also free with a 30-day trial membership to Audible.
 

"Not simply about one mission, [Genesis] is also the history of America's quest for the moon... Zimmerman has done a masterful job of tying disparate events together into a solid account of one of America's greatest human triumphs."--San Antonio Express-News

9 comments

  • InspiredHistoryMike

    I don’t know, just a few challenges to that new lunar lander design, needs to have like 90% of it’s mass on the bottom (8%?) of it’s surface, essentially very strong lightweight rigid structural shell & no internal mass. Then it can’t fail! . . . . .unless it lands somewhere not perfectly flat.(per the article)

  • What I don’t get is the constant reinvention of simple solutions in a more complex form. The Apollo program already did the math for lunar landers. Keep the base wide with 4 legs. I believe the ratio was 4:3 – 4 feet out for every 3 feet up. Maybe if more landers would adopt this configuration then there would be a lot more success. See Firefly as an example.

  • Jeff Wright

    It is the same thing we saw with the Titan submersible–Rush put down engineers with experience in the unforgiving environment of benthic depths.

    Everybody thinks they are Elon now.

    Kids want to do things their way. I see it everywhere.

  • Gary

    Ha! Bob was kind and didn’t “credit” me with submitting the “rover tipping” story. Alas, I’m the guy who “fell” for it. ;)

  • Gary: I did credit you. Look at the first line of the post, where I thank Jay for his suggestions. I added you. I however didn’t put that credit with the link, for your benefit. :)

  • AO1

    “weebles wobble but don’t fall down”

    Or make Lunar landers spherical with the mass at one end, can even make it inflate after launch so it’ll fit into fairing unlike that tetrahedron :-)

  • Max

    New interstellar comet;
    “The object is currently estimated to be roughly 10-20 kilometers wide, Moissl said, which would make it the largest interstellar interloper ever detected. But the object could be smaller if it is made out of ice, which reflects more light.”
    “Veres said the object will continue to brighten as it nears the sun, bending slightly under the pull of gravity, and is expected to reach its closest point—perihelion—on 29 October.“
    https://phys.org/news/2025-07-astronomers-track-solar.html

  • Edward

    Robert wrote: “It is far too complicated a solution to what is really a very simple problem: extend the legs out more and keep the center of gravity low.

    Joe wrote: “What I don’t get is the constant reinvention of simple solutions in a more complex form. The Apollo program already did the math for lunar landers. Keep the base wide with 4 legs. I believe the ratio was 4:3 – 4 feet out for every 3 feet up.

    The Apollo lunar landers also landed almost vertically, not with a lot of horizontal speed, killing almost all their horizontal speed dozens of meters in altitude. They turned off their engines just below two meters in altitude. In order to safely launch the Ascent Module, Apollo also landed in fairly flat places that were less than 12° from horizontal.

    Human eyes seemed to be the superior method of choosing safe landing spots, as Apollo landed safely every time landings were attempted. Some other, unmanned, NASA and Soviet soft landers had failures while landing, back in the 1960s.

    We humans may be suffering from a case of overconfidence, or maybe hubris. We successfully landed on the Moon before, and we have superior technology now than we had then, so why are todays robots having such trouble landing successfully? In the 1960s, Grumman (now Northrup Grumman) tested the [*cough*] out of its landers. Have the modern companies done that? One modern company programmed its lander to ignore altitude measurements if the terrain changed height too quickly, then landed in a huge crater whose walls changed too quickly. Other companies’ landers touched down while traveling too fast horizontally. One lander set down within a small crater, and some landers’ legs have broken upon landing.

    One other factor for the success of Apollo’s landings was enough propellant for the astronauts to find safe landing sites, but are the modern landers too weight conscious to make cautious final approaches?

    Finally, what is SpaceX planning to do so that its Starship-based lunar lander lands successfully? The center of mass will be higher than 4:3, and if it is refilled while on the Moon, then the center of mass will rise even higher. How horizontal can they find their landing spots?

  • Jeff Wright

    Kent Joosten wanted an Eagle like lander
    https://spaceflighthistory.blogspot.com/2017/07/sei-swan-song-international-lunar.html?m=1

    The problem is that there *wasn’t* a Ted Cruz to back the program.

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *