Return of Axiom mission delayed again because of weather
Because of marginal winds at the splashdown points, SpaceX, Axiom, and NASA agreed today to delay the return of Axiom’s first private mission to ISS one more day.
The Axiom Mission 1 (Ax-1) crew is now targeting to undock from the International Space Station 8:55 p.m. EDT Sunday, April 23.
Weather permitting, the Ax-1 crew is targeted to close the hatch at about 6:45 p.m. Sunday, April 24, to begin the journey home in SpaceX Dragon Endeavour with splashdown off the coast of Florida approximately 1:00 p.m. Monday, April 25.
This delay will also delay the launch of NASA’s next crew to ISS on SpaceX’s new Dragon capsule, Freedom, now scheduled for launch no earlier than April 27th.
Readers!
Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. Your support allows me the freedom and ability to analyze objectively the ongoing renaissance in space, as well as the cultural changes -- for good or ill -- that are happening across America. Fourteen years ago I wrote that SLS and Orion were a bad ideas, a waste of money, would be years behind schedule, and better replaced by commercial private enterprise. Only now does it appear that Washington might finally recognize this reality.
In 2020 when the world panicked over COVID I wrote that the panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Only in the past year have some of our so-called experts in the health field have begun to recognize these facts.
Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.
You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are four ways of doing so:
1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.
2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
3. A Paypal Donation or subscription:
4. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652
You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.
Because of marginal winds at the splashdown points, SpaceX, Axiom, and NASA agreed today to delay the return of Axiom’s first private mission to ISS one more day.
The Axiom Mission 1 (Ax-1) crew is now targeting to undock from the International Space Station 8:55 p.m. EDT Sunday, April 23.
Weather permitting, the Ax-1 crew is targeted to close the hatch at about 6:45 p.m. Sunday, April 24, to begin the journey home in SpaceX Dragon Endeavour with splashdown off the coast of Florida approximately 1:00 p.m. Monday, April 25.
This delay will also delay the launch of NASA’s next crew to ISS on SpaceX’s new Dragon capsule, Freedom, now scheduled for launch no earlier than April 27th.
Readers!
Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. Your support allows me the freedom and ability to analyze objectively the ongoing renaissance in space, as well as the cultural changes -- for good or ill -- that are happening across America. Fourteen years ago I wrote that SLS and Orion were a bad ideas, a waste of money, would be years behind schedule, and better replaced by commercial private enterprise. Only now does it appear that Washington might finally recognize this reality.
In 2020 when the world panicked over COVID I wrote that the panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Only in the past year have some of our so-called experts in the health field have begun to recognize these facts.
Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.
You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are four ways of doing so:
1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.
2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
3. A Paypal Donation or subscription:
4. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652
You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.
How are those water landings working out, Elon? Or should I say, NASA?
Ray,
What’s the current alternative? Pyro-landing on land?
More complex, heavier, more points of failure.
Gliding? Been done, didn’t work out a couple times.
Beaming technology? That was kind of unfair as an argument, but serves a useful purpose.
SpaceX is currently developing an alternative to water landings.
Until then, they seem good enough…and have been.
Not a diss, just an opinion.
Valid perspective GaryMike, but as I have said before, if the Russians, Chinese and Boeing can land on land…
First reply seems to have disappeared…
Basically, pyros on land – yes.
1. Dragon already has excellent “pyros”. that could smoothly evolve to full-flight landing.
2. The Russians, Chinese, and Boeing (airbags) can do it.
3. Capsules may not be completely replaced by Starship for quite a while, especially Starships that can land a crew.
Thanks
Crew Dragon was designed for propulsive landings on land using the abort propellant (with parachutes if the propellant was used for an actual abort). Musk even said “Now this is what a 21st century spacecraft looks like” or something to that effect. Short version, NASA’s onerous certification requirements convinced SpaceX to drop the idea and fall back to water landing. So Crew Dragon came out as a bit of a kludge, bringing home a big load of toxic hypergols with every splashdown.
https://spaceflightnow.com/2017/07/19/propulsive-landings-nixed-from-spacexs-dragon-spaceship/
1) Russians and Chinese “landings” are slamming into the ground under a parachute. (I was a graduate of the airborne course at Fort Benning and landings under a chute are NOT light as a feather – as a matter of fact you spend a considerable amount of time during Ground Week practicing Parachute Landing Falls to soften the impact. You can get killed if you don’t do it right). A capsule may have some cushioning devices, but it’s still gonna be a rough ride. And are their capsules reusable like SpaceX? No
2) As of today, Boeing can’t do anything. They can’t even fly their capsule.
Tangentially related: haven’t heard much about Starship “point-to-point” on Earth lately, has anyone else?
I am of the opinion that most Starships will not be designed to land back on Earth, or even to be caught by chopsticks. The only thing worth bringing back to the ground is people, and it is not clear to me that a big ship is the best way to do that – note this is NOT. about point-to-point – that should be a different ship.
Astronauts are going to work in space (LEO, CISLunar, Moon) for months on end and finally come down to their families on Earth in a capsule of some form, designed for trans-atmospheric travel. Starship-like vehicles will be for space TRAVEL to the Moon and beyond, and long-term WORK in LEO and beyond.
You got a link that SpaceX is still working on Dragon ground landings (vs water).
I was under the impression that when they modified the Super-Dracos after one exploded during a test, that using them for such a landing was no longer an option. They had to change them to a “one time use” engine for aborts, and that the change no longer allows intermittent/re-light needed for propulsive landings.
Thinking about Bill Nelson saying Falcon Heavy is going to take up the slack for SLS in building the Lunar Gateway…
AND about Commercial Crew depending on Dragon for the foreseeable future…
AND about NASA selecting Starship as the first and only known lunar landing vehicle…
AND about what happens if EPA denies SpaceX the ability to launch Starship from Boca Chica…
I see a pattern here!
Pad 39A at Cape Canaveral is the ONLY pad that
will have a Starship launch tower…
AND is able to launch manned Dragons…
AND is able to launch Falcon Heavy.
How the hell is Artemis and ISS going to move forward?
sippin_bourbon, they ditched propulsive landings in 2017, the Demo-1 capsule exploded in 2019. No plans to ever use propulsive landing with Crew Dragon, they’ve stopped its production and moved on to Starship.
Scotch man myself… But it’s all good.
Ray Van Dune, yeah NASA has this habit of painting itself into a corner.
I am afraid I have bad news.
There are these supposedly leaked photos of the interior of Booster 7 all stoved in at the Space Explored website.
It looks bad.
Sigh.
Thanks for the info and website Jeff. That picture does not look good, but this is how SpaceX finds out items like this through testing and more testing. I bet they will have a fix done in a month.
Patrick
They stopped production, but retain the ability to make more.
They are shifting to fleet management.
That does not mean they are preparing to ditch it. I think they expect dragons to be flying for some time.
sippin_bourbon you are correct, I just meant they’d halted production. I hope they get plenty of ISS and commercial flights out of the capsules.