To read this post please scroll down.

 

Readers! A November fund-raising drive!

 

It is unfortunately time for another November fund-raising campaign to support my work here at Behind the Black. I really dislike doing these, but 2025 is so far turning out to be a very poor year for donations and subscriptions, the worst since 2020. I very much need your support for this webpage to survive.

 

And I think I provide real value. Fifteen years ago I said SLS was garbage and should be cancelled. Almost a decade ago I said Orion was a lie and a bad idea. As early as 1998, long before almost anyone else, I predicted in my first book, Genesis: The Story of Apollo 8, that private enterprise and freedom would conquer the solar system, not government. Very early in the COVID panic and continuing throughout I noted that every policy put forth by the government (masks, social distancing, lockdowns, jab mandates) was wrong, misguided, and did more harm than good. In planetary science, while everyone else in the media still thinks Mars has no water, I have been reporting the real results from the orbiters now for more than five years, that Mars is in fact a planet largely covered with ice.

 

I could continue with numerous other examples. If you want to know what others will discover a decade hence, read what I write here at Behind the Black. And if you read my most recent book, Conscious Choice, you will find out what is going to happen in space in the next century.

 

 

This last claim might sound like hubris on my part, but I base it on my overall track record.

 

So please consider donating or subscribing to Behind the Black, either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. I could really use the support at this time. There are five ways of doing so:

 

1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.

 

2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation. Takes about a 10% cut.
 

3. A Paypal Donation or subscription, which takes about a 15% cut:

 

4. Donate by check. I get whatever you donate. Make the check payable to Robert Zimmerman and mail it to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.


Russia releases timeline for its Russian Orbital Station to replace its ISS operations

Tabletop Model of Russian Space Station
A tabletop model of the station unveiled in 2022

Earlier this month Russia released a detailed timeline for the construction of its Russian Orbital Station (ROS) to replace its ISS operations once the older station is retired and de-orbited, with the first station module supposedly launched in 2027 and the station completed by 2033.

Russia is set to launch the future orbital outpost’s first research and energy module in 2027, Roscosmos said. Roscosmos also plans to launch the universal nodal, gateway and baseline modules by 2030 to form the core orbital station together with the research and energy module, it said. “At the second stage, from 2031 to 2033, the station is set to expand by docking two special-purpose modules (TsM1 and TsM2),” Roscosmos said.

The project is estimated at 608.9 billion rubles (about $6.98 billion).

This project has been discussed in Russia since the middle of the last decade, and as usual for Russian government-run space projects, it has limped along with little but powerpoint proposals and small demo models (as shown on the right) for years. The impending end of ISS and its replacement by commercial stations (that will not include any Russian participation) seems to have finally helped get the project started for real.

Don’t expect this above schedule however to meet its target dates. Russia’s track record since the fall of the Soviet Union is that such projects usually take two decades to launch, not three years.

Genesis cover

On Christmas Eve 1968 three Americans became the first humans to visit another world. What they did to celebrate was unexpected and profound, and will be remembered throughout all human history. Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8, Robert Zimmerman's classic history of humanity's first journey to another world, tells that story, and it is now available as both an ebook and an audiobook, both with a foreword by Valerie Anders and a new introduction by Robert Zimmerman.

 

The print edition can be purchased at Amazon or from any other book seller. If you want an autographed copy the price is $60 for the hardback and $45 for the paperback, plus $8 shipping for each. Go here for purchasing details. The ebook is available everywhere for $5.99 (before discount) at amazon, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. If you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and the author gets a bigger cut much sooner.


The audiobook is also available at all these vendors, and is also free with a 30-day trial membership to Audible.
 

"Not simply about one mission, [Genesis] is also the history of America's quest for the moon... Zimmerman has done a masterful job of tying disparate events together into a solid account of one of America's greatest human triumphs."--San Antonio Express-News

7 comments

  • geoffc

    Key question – what inclination are they aiming for?

    51.6 like ISS or a more Polar orbit they had been suggesting.

    If it was 51.6 they could reuse parts from ISS. But not in the new inclination

  • Jay

    Geoffc,
    I have seen a range of numbers mentioned on Russian websites = 70 to 97 degrees.

  • Russia’s track record since the fall of the Soviet Union is that such projects usually take two decades to launch, not three years
    So much has changed in the last 35 years and as far as the Russians new space station, well at least they have plans for one.
    I’m sorry to say that it’s the US that finds itself in the “such projects usually take two decades to launch, not three years” part of the conversation.

  • Gealon

    It looks like Mir retreads.

    The module at the rear looks like Kevant 1, Mir core module ahead of that, Spekter with larger solar panels to the right , Krystal to the left. The thing on top is new, it looks like a multiple docking adapter, which makes no sense since it’s off axis. Bottom and front I can’t identify.

  • David Eastman

    The proposed schedule has 19 Soyuz and 15 Angara launches related to this station in the 2027-2033 time frame. That’s on top of whatever other launch commitments they may have for their own payloads and ISS support. That right there is a stretch given their current capabilities, not even considering having the payloads ready. And they are developing and testing the new PTK crew spacecraft as part of that timeline. I’d love to see it happen, but there’s just no way they pull it off. If you were offering bets, I don’t think you could get anyone to bid on it actually happening on schedule. I think the real question is whether the space station goes up as designed, but a decade or more late, or doesn’t go up at all, or just as the absolute bare complement of modules, and then gets abandoned soon after.

  • Edward

    Charles wrote: “I’m sorry to say that it’s the US that finds itself in the “such projects usually take two decades to launch, not three years” part of the conversation.

    Sadly, this has truth to it. The U.S. projects that are taking two decades are government projects. Webb was one of those. It should have taken a decade and was originally budgeted for half a billion dollars, eventually costing almost ten billion. Artemis started out as Constellation and is also taking more than two decades and is costing several tens of billions of dollars (I lost count, years ago, around twenty billion, including Constellation, Gateway, and Orion).

    The good news: This is one of the several advantages of commercial space projects. Their financiers are not as forgiving as governments, and they will — and have — pulled the plug on projects that they lose faith in. This is what happened to Virgin Orbit, last year, because they could not talk investors into a new infusion of cash to tide them over a few months to fix a problem.

    Unlike government projects, commercial projects not only have to make money, but they do better when they make their money sooner rather than later. It is one of the reasons that SpaceX’s development programs tend to move fast and break things. They find out quickly which new concepts work and which may need more improvement than is affordable. Starlink did not exactly break its satellites, but it moved fast to launch already-obsolete satellites just to verify some concepts now rather than later.

    Starship is currently at over five billion dollars and appears to have ramped up to spending two billion dollars per year. It was originally a Power Point presentation in 2016, eight years ago, but it is getting close to revenue service.

  • Dick Eagleson

    The late Soviet Union also had a lot of big plans for what turned out to be its non-existent future. The way things are currently trending, Russia’s odds of still being an extant nation-state by the 2027 – 2033 timeframe are looking to be no better than a coin-flip.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *