To read this post please scroll down.

 

Readers! A November fund-raising drive!

 

It is unfortunately time for another November fund-raising campaign to support my work here at Behind the Black. I really dislike doing these, but 2025 is so far turning out to be a very poor year for donations and subscriptions, the worst since 2020. I very much need your support for this webpage to survive.

 

And I think I provide real value. Fifteen years ago I said SLS was garbage and should be cancelled. Almost a decade ago I said Orion was a lie and a bad idea. As early as 1998, long before almost anyone else, I predicted in my first book, Genesis: The Story of Apollo 8, that private enterprise and freedom would conquer the solar system, not government. Very early in the COVID panic and continuing throughout I noted that every policy put forth by the government (masks, social distancing, lockdowns, jab mandates) was wrong, misguided, and did more harm than good. In planetary science, while everyone else in the media still thinks Mars has no water, I have been reporting the real results from the orbiters now for more than five years, that Mars is in fact a planet largely covered with ice.

 

I could continue with numerous other examples. If you want to know what others will discover a decade hence, read what I write here at Behind the Black. And if you read my most recent book, Conscious Choice, you will find out what is going to happen in space in the next century.

 

 

This last claim might sound like hubris on my part, but I base it on my overall track record.

 

So please consider donating or subscribing to Behind the Black, either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. I could really use the support at this time. There are five ways of doing so:

 

1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.

 

2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation. Takes about a 10% cut.
 

3. A Paypal Donation or subscription, which takes about a 15% cut:

 

4. Donate by check. I get whatever you donate. Make the check payable to Robert Zimmerman and mail it to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.


Space Force approves Vandenberg environmental assessment, allowing SpaceX’s to launch as much as 100 times annually

Map of Vandenberg Space Force Base, showing SpaceX's two launchpads
Figure 2.1-1 of the final environmental assessment report

The Space Force on October 10, 2025 announced it has now finalized and approved the environmental assessment that will permit SpaceX’s to increase its launch rate at Vandenberg to as much as 100 times per year.

The DAF [Air Force] has decided to increase the annual Falcon launch cadence at VSFB [Vandenberg] through launch and landing operations at SLC-4 and SLC-6 [the two SpaceX launchpads], including modification of SLC-6 for Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launch vehicles to support future U.S. Government and commercial launch service needs. The overall launch cadence will increase from 50 Falcon 9 launches per year at SLC-4 to up to 100 launches per year for Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy at both SLCs combined. Falcon Heavy, which has not previously launched from VSFB, would launch and land up to five times per year from and at SLC-6. The DAF will authorize SpaceX to construct a new hangar south of the HIF [SpaceX’s horizontal integration facility] and north of SLC-6 to support Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy integration and processing.

You can read the full environmental assessment here [pdf]. The map to the right, from the assessment, shows the location at Vandenberg of the two SpaceX launch sites. SLC-4 (pronounced “slick-four”) is the pad SpaceX has been using for years to launch Falcon 9s. SLC-6 was originally built for the space shuttle but never used for that purpose. Subsequently ULA leased it to launch its Delta family of rockets. When that rocket was retired SpaceX won the lease to reconfigure the site for both Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launches.

The Space Force apparently decided to ignore the objections of the California Coastal Commission as well as a number of anti-Musk leftwing activist groups. And its decision is well grounded in facts. The report documents at length the lack of any consequential environmental impacts from the increase of launches, which is further supported by almost three quarters of a century of actual use.

The decision is also well founded in basic American culture and law. The Space Force as a government agency must act as a servant of the American people, in this case represented by the private company SpaceX. It must therefore do whatever it can to aid and support that company, not put up roadblocks because it doesn’t like what the company proposes.

At least under Trump, this is the approach the Space Force is taking. I fear what will happen if a Democrat regains the presidency, based on the radical and enthused communist make-up of that party today.

Genesis cover

On Christmas Eve 1968 three Americans became the first humans to visit another world. What they did to celebrate was unexpected and profound, and will be remembered throughout all human history. Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8, Robert Zimmerman's classic history of humanity's first journey to another world, tells that story, and it is now available as both an ebook and an audiobook, both with a foreword by Valerie Anders and a new introduction by Robert Zimmerman.

 

The print edition can be purchased at Amazon or from any other book seller. If you want an autographed copy the price is $60 for the hardback and $45 for the paperback, plus $8 shipping for each. Go here for purchasing details. The ebook is available everywhere for $5.99 (before discount) at amazon, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. If you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and the author gets a bigger cut much sooner.


The audiobook is also available at all these vendors, and is also free with a 30-day trial membership to Audible.
 

"Not simply about one mission, [Genesis] is also the history of America's quest for the moon... Zimmerman has done a masterful job of tying disparate events together into a solid account of one of America's greatest human triumphs."--San Antonio Express-News

4 comments

  • Isn’t SpaceX going to need to launch thousands of V3 Starlinks into polar orbits using Starship?

  • Dick Eagleson

    A Starship launch facility at Vandy might be barely possible – and would certainly constitute a poke in the eye with a sharp stick to current and any future Democrat administrations in Sacramento – but it’s not essential. SpaceX already launches Falcons to high-inclination orbits from KSC and Canaveral. It can do the same with Starships.

    The two biggest sticking points for a Starship presence at Vandy are that SpaceX, thus far, is building, or has built, Starship production facilities at its Starship launch sites. Just accommodating a Starship launch facility at Vandy would be a “footprint” challenge. There is no way a third Starfactory could be built on Vandy ground and doing so outside the wire would just invite more harassment from the Coastal Commission. And then there’s the fact that Elon would be disinclined to put anything new and large into California unless its state government reliably flips to Republican control. There is a modest possibility of a Republican taking the Governorship next year, but the Dems have supermajorities in both houses of the CA state legislature and are likely to keep such in at least one house even if we get a Republican Governor.

  • Jay

    I talked to my friend today who does projects at Vandy about Starship. They do have the space for it south of SLC-6, it has been talked about, but they need a lot of infrastructure upgrades, and to handle all the employees of SpaceX. They are still working on fixing up SLC-6 by the way.

    I agree with Dick Eagleson’s assessment of the political hostility of California towards Musk. It would not happen and I don’t think it is worth it. I can see the lawsuit costs alone would be the equivalent of two trips to Mars.

  • Edward

    Dick Eagleson wrote: “SpaceX already launches Falcons to high-inclination orbits from KSC and Canaveral. It can do the same with Starships.

    True, true. However, that would reduce the payload capacity, because there is a little more maneuvering necessary from KSC and Canaveral than from Vandenberg.

    And then there’s the fact that Elon would be disinclined to put anything new and large into California unless its state government reliably flips to Republican control.

    I’m not sure that it is Republican control, per se, but that California — and especially its legislature — is both anti-business and anti-Musk. Most likely a Republican controlled California would be more favorable, but there was a time when the Democrats were still in favor of business and still appreciative of Musk and SpaceX. But that was before they went insane and lost touch with reality.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *