To read this post please scroll down.

 

Readers!

 

My July fund-raising campaign to celebrate the fifteenth anniversary since I began Behind the Black is now over. I want to thank all those who so generously donated or subscribed, especially those who have become regular supporters. I can't do this without your help. I also find it increasingly hard to express how much your support means to me. God bless you all!

 

The donations during this year's campaign were sadly less than previous years, but for this I blame myself. I am tired of begging for money, and so I put up the campaign announcement at the start of the month but had no desire to update it weekly to encourage more donations, as I have done in past years. This lack of begging likely contributed to the drop in donations.

 

No matter. I am here, and here I intend to stay. If you like what I do and have not yet donated or subscribed, please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are four ways of doing so:

 

1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.

 

2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
 

3. A Paypal Donation or subscription:

 

4. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.


SpaceX launches 28 Starlink satellites

SpaceX this evening successfully placed another 28 Starlink satellites into orbit, its Falcon 9 rocket lifting off from Vandenberg Space Force Base in California.

The first stage, B1063, completed its 28th flight, landing on a drone ship in the Pacific. (This booster had been listed as the first stage on a launch two days ago, but it turns out the booster on that flight was B1082, completing its 16th flight.) The present rankings for the most reflights of a rocket:

39 Discovery space shuttle
33 Atlantis space shuttle
30 Falcon 9 booster B1067
28 Columbia space shuttle
28 Falcon 9 booster B1071
28 Falcon 9 booster B1063
27 Falcon 9 booster B1069

Sources here and here.

The leaders in the 2025 launch race:

126 SpaceX
57 China
13 Russia
12 Rocket Lab

SpaceX now leads the rest of the world in successful launches, 126 to 97. China has a launch scheduled for this evening, but nothing as yet has been published about its status as of this posting.

Genesis cover

On Christmas Eve 1968 three Americans became the first humans to visit another world. What they did to celebrate was unexpected and profound, and will be remembered throughout all human history. Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8, Robert Zimmerman's classic history of humanity's first journey to another world, tells that story, and it is now available as both an ebook and an audiobook, both with a foreword by Valerie Anders and a new introduction by Robert Zimmerman.

 

The print edition can be purchased at Amazon or from any other book seller. If you want an autographed copy the price is $60 for the hardback and $45 for the paperback, plus $8 shipping for each. Go here for purchasing details. The ebook is available everywhere for $5.99 (before discount) at amazon, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. If you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and the author gets a bigger cut much sooner.


The audiobook is also available at all these vendors, and is also free with a 30-day trial membership to Audible.
 

"Not simply about one mission, [Genesis] is also the history of America's quest for the moon... Zimmerman has done a masterful job of tying disparate events together into a solid account of one of America's greatest human triumphs."--San Antonio Express-News

6 comments

  • Ronaldus Magnus

    About 3 weeks ago, I started watching the almost every other day, every 3 days Falcon 9 launches and first stage landings. On the ocean drone barges, there is a large circle and a bullseye in the center of the circle. Almost every drone ship landing does not simply land inside the circle. It lands in the center of the center of the circle. East Coast, West Coast, it does not matter.

    Tonight’s landing was another bullseye.

    Not bad, not bad at all.

  • Jeff Wright

    So, what would a limit be—60 flights? More.

    I wonder if the size of Falcon has hit some kind of sweet spot. Smaller, and maybe re-use isn’t that valuable. Anything larger, and it can be problematic.

  • Rockribbed1

    I believe Starship development is progressing well. The first super heavy reuse is coming up. Mars is the next signpost ahead.

  • Ray Van Dune

    If reuse is defined as “relaunched”, booster 14 was reused on flight 9, but was not recovered. There is some justification for this definition, since it did indeed perform its second boost function successfully.

  • sippin_bourbon

    Firefly appears to have had an issue with a booster for the next flight.

    Very flamey.

  • Edward

    Jeff Wright,
    You wondered “ if the size of Falcon has hit some kind of sweet spot. Smaller, and maybe re-use isn’t that valuable. Anything larger, and it can be problematic.

    I don’t know about that. Super Heavy is significantly larger but is doing more than just fine, it is landing by being caught by “chopsticks.” Meanwhile, SpaceX is still searching for optimizations for Super Heavy, and that requires going too far and losing test articles by test-to-destruction. One of SpaceX’s philosophies, the best part is no part, requires that parts be removed to the point of failure of the whole unit, giving rise to another philosophy: if you don’t have to add back parts, then you didn’t remove enough of them. In the same way, if you don’t test to destruction, then you don’t know the limits of the design’s abilities. If you don’t test to destruction, you don’t know what is optimal for the general design.*

    If you are comparing Starship’s reentries with the Falcon booster reentry, then your comparison is unfair. Orbital reentry is far more difficult than reentry of a booster. The heat shielding is more intensive for the orbital reentry.

    The number of flights? That is hard to say, and it may depend upon whether you include engine flights. The engines may not last as long as the boy (fuselage?).

    Here at BTB, a decade ago, we had a discussion about the optimal number of reuses of a rocket or its booster, but we had focused on cost, not availability for the next launch. The first reuse saves the cost of building another rocket, but as it is reused more and more, the delta cost becomes much less and the other costs of launch dominate the equation. For instance, between the 99th flight and 100th flight, only 1% of the manufacturing cost is saved. We did not account for the costs of refurbishment, because those were unknown at the time, and many in the rocket industry believed that refurbishment makes rocket reusability uneconomical. Their main evidence was the Space Shuttle and its solid rocket boosters, which were not as economical as had been expected.
    ________________
    * This does not mean that you have the best design or the optimal design. Starship has been designed using certain assumptions and has left out some efficiencies that cannot be redesigned into the concept. Other companies have plenty of room to find more efficiencies and optimizations that are beyond Starship’s capabilities.

    The same holds for the Falcons. As we watch China try to reuse boosters, we could — and maybe should — look for areas in which they have found better efficiencies or optimizations that SpaceX left on the table when they committed to the Falcon design.

    We have already seen several areas in which SpaceX has improved upon the Space Shuttle’s designed-in reusability. The Shuttle had problems with its thermal protection system’s heat shield. The Shuttle’s engines needed more refurbishment between flights than a low cost or quick turnaround system requires. Putting a Shuttle together with its External Tank and Solid Rocket Boosters, then getting it out to the launch pad took a lot of time, too. Starship is still developing its heat shielding, reducing the amount of maintenance needed on the engines, and working out how to get the booster and orbiter back on the launch pad and ready for another flight quickly, perhaps hours. Landing on a runway was an improvement over splashing a capsule in the middle of the ocean, but landing at the launchpad seems to be an even better improvement for rapid turnaround.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *