Scroll down to read this post.

 

Genesis cover

On Christmas Eve 1968 three Americans became the first humans to visit another world. What they did to celebrate was unexpected and profound, and will be remembered throughout all human history. Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8, Robert Zimmerman's classic history of humanity's first journey to another world, tells that story, and it is now available as both an ebook and an audiobook, both with a foreword by Valerie Anders and a new introduction by Robert Zimmerman.

 

The print edition can be purchased at Amazon. from any other book seller, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. The ebook is available everywhere for $5.99 (before discount) at amazon, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. If you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and the author gets a bigger cut much sooner.


The audiobook is also available at all these vendors, and is also free with a 30-day trial membership to Audible.
 

"Not simply about one mission, [Genesis] is also the history of America's quest for the moon... Zimmerman has done a masterful job of tying disparate events together into a solid account of one of America's greatest human triumphs."--San Antonio Express-News


SpaceX test fires next generation rocket engine

Capitalism in space: This week Elon Musk tweeted pictures of the first static test firing of the first flight Raptor engine, to be used on SpaceX’s next generation rocket, the Super Heavy first stage and the Starship upper stage.

The billionaire entrepreneur also tweeted out several videos of the 3-second test, which took place at the company’s development facility in McGregor, Texas.

Starship is the 100-passenger stainless-steel vehicle SpaceX is building to take people and cargo to Mars and other distant destinations. Starship will launch atop a giant rocket SpaceX calls Super Heavy. Both of these vehicles will be reusable and Raptor-powered. Starship will sport seven of the new engines, and Super Heavy will use 31 Raptors to get off the ground.

A “hopper” prototype that SpaceX will use to test the Starship design on short flights within Earth’s atmosphere will have three Raptor engines. This hopper will debut soon, Musk has said — perhaps within the next month or so, if everything goes according to plan.

This engine appears to be the first built with the intention to actually fly, and is likely going to be used in that “hopper” prototype.

The support of my readers through the years has given me the freedom and ability to analyze objectively the ongoing renaissance in space, as well as the cultural changes -- for good or ill -- that are happening across America. Four years ago, just before the 2020 election I wrote that Joe Biden's mental health was suspect. Only in this year has the propaganda mainstream media decided to recognize that basic fact.

 

Fourteen years ago I wrote that SLS and Orion were a bad ideas, a waste of money, would be years behind schedule, and better replaced by commercial private enterprise. Even today NASA and Congress refuse to recognize this reality.

 

In 2020 when the world panicked over COVID I wrote that the panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Only in the past year have some of our so-called experts in the health field have begun to recognize these facts.

 

Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.

 

Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black.

 

You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are five ways of doing so:

 

1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.

 

2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
 

3. A Paypal Donation:

4. A Paypal subscription:


5. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above. And if you buy the books through the ebookit links, I get a larger cut and I get it sooner.

4 comments

  • Col Beausabre

    THIRTY ONE ENGINES !? Wow…that sounds like an awful lot of things to fail. As far as I know, the record is the Russian R-7 Semyorka (To the West it was known by the NATO reporting name SS-6 Sapwood and within the Soviet Union by the GRAU index 8K71) which had twenty main engines and twelve verniers burning at liftoff
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R-7_Semyorka

  • That’s incorrect. The R-7 and it’s descendents have 5 engines, each with 4 chambers, plus verniers, all fed by the same set of 5 turbopumps. Look at it this way: a 6-cylinder car has one engine, not six engines. Anyway, the current record for a successu launch and flight is held by the Falcon Heavy, qhich has 27 distinct engines (and thus 27 sets of turbopumps). The jump from 27 engines to 31 engines is not very big. Not that long ago, people were predicting Falcon 9 would fail because it had “too many engines.” After all, it had one more engine than the 8-engine Saturn 1! This nonsense derives from an engineering dispute had back in the 1950s, called “Cluster’s Last Stand.” Look it up. As for “an awful lot of things to fail…”, failure stats depend on the failure stats of the individual engines. The only way more engines is worse than less engines is if you’re comparing vehicles with different numbers of the exact same engine. Otherwise, if a 1-engine rocket suffers and engine failure, it’s loss of mission, but a 31 engine rocket it’s not. The counter argument, that the 31-engine rocket has “more engines than it needs” is risible.

  • geoffc

    @WIllaim The Soviet N-1 had 32 engines (NK-15’s aiming to upgrade to NK-33’s which were built then, and used by Antares just recently) and they had an issue of resonance in the plumbing causing issues they did not expect.

    So there is more to just the raw engine count.

    Hopper is using 3 Raptors, of which this is one of them. Then they will test the upper stage with 7, and then move on to 31 on the first stage. So they will be making incremental changes after their experience with F-Heavy and 3 sets of 9 engines. So this is not as crazy sounding as it certainly does, at first.

  • That strikes me as not seeing the forest for the trees. I specified successful so as to eliminate the failed N-1, but the fact is, N-1 failed because of a Soviet lack of ground test facilities. They had to build and fly the rockets to test them. Saturn V succeeded on the first try because the US did have adequate testing facilties and what rockets exploded did so on the test stand. Back in the beginning, we didn’t have the facilities either, so the first few years saw many glorious in-flight explosions. SpaceX has actually had a couple of Falcon 9 failures (one on the pad, one in flight) that are analogous to the N-1 failures (Frozen oxygen in COPV overwrap? Who’d’a thunk it!! I think part of that is because, with a few exceptions, the SpaceX teams were young and re-inventing too many wheels. If you think about it, Musk himself was 31 when he started SpaceX and is 47 now. Remember Musk couldn’t hire a chief designer for love or money, and had to do the job himself armed with a basic physics degree (I think his econ degree from the Wharton school [sane as Trump] contributed equally to SpaceX success). The recent switch from composite to stainless for Starship shows how far up the learning curve they’ve gone.

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *