Scroll down to read this post.

 

Genesis cover

On Christmas Eve 1968 three Americans became the first humans to visit another world. What they did to celebrate was unexpected and profound, and will be remembered throughout all human history. Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8, Robert Zimmerman's classic history of humanity's first journey to another world, tells that story, and it is now available as both an ebook and an audiobook, both with a foreword by Valerie Anders and a new introduction by Robert Zimmerman.

 

The print edition can be purchased at Amazon. from any other book seller, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. The ebook is available everywhere for $5.99 (before discount) at amazon, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. If you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and the author gets a bigger cut much sooner.


The audiobook is also available at all these vendors, and is also free with a 30-day trial membership to Audible.
 

"Not simply about one mission, [Genesis] is also the history of America's quest for the moon... Zimmerman has done a masterful job of tying disparate events together into a solid account of one of America's greatest human triumphs."--San Antonio Express-News


Starship lost near end of its orbital burn; Superheavy successfully captured by chopsticks

Superheavy captured for the second time
Superheavy captured for the second time

In today’s seventh test flight of SpaceX’s Starship/Superheavy large rocket, the results were decidedly mixed.

First the success: Superheavy once again performed perfectly, getting Starship up to speed and releasing it for its orbital flight. It then successfully returned to the tower at Boca Chica, where the chopsticks arms caught it. This was the second catch in three attempts. While we should all expect SpaceX to continue to refine Superheavy, right now it appears to be largely ready to go.

Next the failure: Shortly after stage separation Starship fired its own engines and proceeded upward towards orbit. At one point close to when it was suppose to shut off its engines to begin its orbital coast phase, something went wrong. Some engines cut off, but one did not, at least according to data projected on the screen. At that point all telemetry from the ship ended.

After another ten minutes of analysis flight controlers declared the ship lost. What happened remains unclear, but it is certain SpaceX engineers are digging hard to find out.

One unfortunate question remains that must be asked: Where is the ship, and is there a chance it will come down somewhere unexpected? Its orbit is such that it will naturally fall in the Indian Ocean, but the engine issues might have changed that orbit somewhat.

UPDATE: Locals in the Turks and Caicos Islands in the Caribbean post videos on X (here and here) of Starship breaking up overhead. It appears that if any debris reaches the ground it will land in the Atlantic.

Readers!

 

Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. Your support allows me the freedom and ability to analyze objectively the ongoing renaissance in space, as well as the cultural changes -- for good or ill -- that are happening across America. Fourteen years ago I wrote that SLS and Orion were a bad ideas, a waste of money, would be years behind schedule, and better replaced by commercial private enterprise. Only now does it appear that Washington might finally recognize this reality.

 

In 2020 when the world panicked over COVID I wrote that the panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Only in the past year have some of our so-called experts in the health field have begun to recognize these facts.

 

Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.

 

You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are four ways of doing so:

 

1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.

 

2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
 

3. A Paypal Donation or subscription:

 

4. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.

20 comments

  • Steve Richter

    do any of the pieces endanger people on inhabited islands?

  • Doubting Thomas

    Pictures appearing around Turks and Caicos shows large debris field reentering

  • All: Refresh my post. I have updated it to include those pictures of Starship debris.

  • Successive engine failures until it went boom. First engine out around 7:40. 5 out at 8:24 shortly after which it broke up. Video looks like everything went downrange from Turks & Caicos. Bummer. OTOH, looks like they’re close to perfecting recovering Superheavy on a regular basis. Progress.

    While I enjoyed BO’s flight. I worry that they haven’t broken enough stuff to learn as yet. Cheers –

  • Jeff Wright

    I wouldn’t think so.

    More concerning was an (alleged) Starship interior photograph shared by @BocasBrain
    (“Feeling kinda hot for Flight 7”)

    It looked like it had been hit with grapeshot.

    I am thinking a Raptor exploded–engines started going out early–so I think Starship faced re-entry heating early–which widened the holes and tore apart the airframe.

    No worries.

    Just put a NG upper stage atop SuperHeavy, and you have a whole rocket that works as well as SLS on flight one.

    Oh, and one more thing Mr. Z…if my scenario is accurate, then this is a potential threat to Lunar Starship as well–even if it needs no TPS.

    This is why I love parallel staging–all engines at the bottom–attachment points far from them.

  • F

    This was not a COMPLETE success, but it was certainly a tremendous success.

    Superheavy worked beautifully. Starship, obviously, experienced a significant malfunction.

    Given the competency and work history of the SpaceX engineers, I suspect the greatest challenge will be a lack of available information for them to study in order to determine exactly what went wrong.

  • Frank

    We all learned about tank sloshing from the first Falcon 1 failures. I saw what looks like some guidance oscillation in the boost phase.

    Later, engine telemetry shows Ship’s engine loss order on one side would have created a thrust vector that would drive gimbal correction to its limit and where control would be lost with just one vacume engine firing.

  • Steve Richter

    based on this track of commercial jets circling, the debris was east of Turks.
    https://x.com/DJSnM/status/1880032865209184354/photo/1

  • BillB

    Jeff Wright

    Those pictures from inside a Starship were from Starship 29. They may have been IR enhanced.

  • MDN

    From the telemetry it does look like serial engine failures, and worse, after 3 died the remaining 3 were all on one side and as speed continued to increase were still vigorously thrusting massively off axis. So I’d bet the ship simply flipped sideways and broke aprt from the stresses.

    As regards the initial engine out spreading, as this is the first V2 design really expected to use Raptor 3 which requires much less shielding, perhaps they just rolled the dice that a Raptor 2 RUD was low probability in the meantime so it was not contained as well as it would have been on a V1.

    V2 is slated to carry payloads to orbit for profit, so deleting unnecessary mass must be a high priority. Thus I would not be surprised to see Raptor 3s on the next ship.

  • I must say a SpaceX failure is on one level a beautiful thing.

    Not something you want to do too often though.

  • Jack O'Leary

    Good test launch. Happy to see a major problem so early in the program, will result in a more reliable Ship.

    Nothing fails like success.

  • Richard M

    Elon jumped out a little while ago on X with a first cut of an explanation for what may have gone wrong:

    “Preliminary indication is that we had an oxygen/fuel leak in the cavity above the ship engine firewall that was large enough to build pressure in excess of the vent capacity.

    “Apart from obviously double-checking for leaks, we will add fire suppression to that volume and probably increase vent area. Nothing so far suggests pushing next launch past next month.”
    https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1880060983734858130

    Bill Nelson seems unfazed by it, even allowing for the fact that he’s got only 4 more days on the job:

    “Congrats to @SpaceX on Starship’s seventh test flight and the second successful booster catch.

    “Spaceflight is not easy. It’s anything but routine. That’s why these tests are so important—each one bringing us closer on our path to the Moon and onward to Mars through #Artemis.”
    https://x.com/SenBillNelson/status/1880057863135248587

    (Elon thanked him for this tweet.)

  • Richard M

    Oh, and one more thing Mr. Z…if my scenario is accurate, then this is a potential threat to Lunar Starship as well–even if it needs no TPS.

    I think it’s a little premature to raise the Tocsins of Doom just yet.

    It’s a RUD, and obviously SpaceX didn’t want that, but if they’re as close to building out the fault tree as Elon seems to suggest tonight, it may not be a significant setback of any kind. Obviously the FAA gets a say, too, but maybe they’ll be feeling in a more efficient mode after January 20.

  • Mike

    Don’t forget, this was a V2 Ship.

    A lot of new untested hardware.

    Let’s hope the incoming FAA people stay hands off.

  • Jay

    Thanks Marcus Z for that video.

  • Jeff Wright

    Probably not– Ellie in Space said there was a number to call if any debris is found
    1-866-623-0234

    Blue Origin is the big winner this week,and seeing it’s big hydrolox upper stage work means I can breathe a big sigh of relief that the end of SLS is not the end of hydrogen rocketry…with NG and Stoke doing better.

    Now–all snark and ribbing aside–I consider SS/SH a national asset.

    I think some older MSFC retirees and SpaceX need to work together. The young folks at SpaceX and old hands may learn from one another.

    Have Marshall guys sign some secrecy documents and kick the ball around.

  • Mike Borgelt

    I get mildly annoyed when the old “space is hard”, “spaceflight is anything but routine” tropes are rolled out. Humanity has been doing orbital spaceflight for 68 years and Falcon 9 demonstrates the routine nature of operations.
    A new rocket is nowadays like a new airplane design. There exists a vast body of knowledge to base the design on. Sometimes you lose one in testing but rarely nowadays.
    We went from 1903 to 1935 to 1958, from Wright Flyer to DC-3 to routine Boeing 707 flights across the Atlantic in 55 years and less than 10 years later the A-12 and SR-71 were flying routinely.

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *