The uncertainty of science: On May 1st NOAA updated its monthly graph to show the Sun’s sunspot activity through the end of April 2021. As I do every month, I have annotated it to show the previous solar cycle predictions and posted it below.
In my sunspot update last month I reviewed in detail the range of predictions by solar scientist for the upcoming solar maximum, noting that based on the higher than expected sunspot activity that has been occurring since the ramp up to solar maximum began in 2020, it appeared that all of their predictions might be wrong. The continuing high activity that occurred in April continued that trend.
The graph above has been modified to show the predictions of the solar science community for the previous solar maximum. The green curves show the community’s two original predictions from April 2007 for the previous maximum, with half the scientists predicting a very strong maximum and half predicting a weak one. The blue curve is their revised May 2009 prediction. The red curve is the new prediction, first posted by NOAA in April 2020.
As the dots on the black line show, since the low point in February, just above the red prediction curve, the number of sunspots in April continued upward at the same pace as in March. Since the beginning of 2020 the Sun’s sunspot activity has consistently exceeded the prediction.
Does that mean we are heading for a very active solar maximum? No, not at these numbers. While the activity does exceed the prediction, it does not do so by much. If you extrapolate these numbers through 2025 (something I admit is a dangerous thing to do), it suggests the next solar maximum will be slightly more active than predicted, and only marginally more powerful than the previous very weak maximum in 2014. Such a maximum would still be very weak, and in fact would be a positive confirmation of the red curve prediction.
Two weak maximums in a row would also continue past patterns, as shown by the historic solar cycle curves at the bottom of the graph. The first two maximums for the 1800s and 1900s were also weak. Having the first two maximums in the 2000s also be weak would simply continue that pattern.
Why such a pattern happens however remains unknown. Though we know that the sunspot cycle is caused by fluctuations in the Sun’s dynamo, no one really understands that dynamo or the processes that cause it to fluctuate.
Furthermore, my extrapolation above must be taken with a gigantic grain of salt. There is no guarantee activity will continue at this pace. It is just as likely that the Sun’s activity will ease in the coming year and begin to match the prediction. Or go up to further exceed it. Because we really don’t know why the activity fluctuates, we can’t make any meaningful predictions about what it will do next.
Please consider donating to Behind the Black, by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar below. Your support will allow me to continue covering science and culture as I have for the past twenty years, independent and free from any outside influence.
Your support is even more essential to me because I keep this site free from advertisements and do not participate in corrupt social media companies like Google, Twitter, and Facebook. I depend wholly on the direct support of my readers.
You can provide that support to Behind The Black with a contribution via Patreon or PayPal. To use Patreon, go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation. For PayPal click one of the following buttons:
If Patreon or Paypal don't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
Cortaro, AZ 85652