Space News buries the lede
In reporting the information revealed in an audio report of two SpaceX engineers to Elon Musk, Space News completely misses the main reason Musk posted this video.
The focus of Jeff Foust’s report is the technical problems the engineers revealed that occurred during the descent of Superheavy during the last flight. According to them, one particular parameter related to the Raptor engines was one second away from demanding an abort, whereby the rocket would not attempt to be captured by the tower chopsticks but instead crash along side it. In addition, these engineers reported the worrisome consequences when a chine on the booster ripped off shortly before landing.
All interesting, but the real reason Elon Musk posted this clip from a much longer audio report is what one engineer says about two thirds of the way through:
Given that that is the first launch [#6] in a long time — well, really, ever — that we’ve not been FAA driven, we’re trying to go do a reasonable balance of speed and risk mitigation on the booster, specifically.
Musk wished everyone to know without question the perspective of his employees when it comes to the red tape of the FAA. It hasn’t been our imagination. For the past three years the FAA has determined the test schedule, slowing it down significantly while costing SpaceX a lot of money.
Space News, which generally has been in the tank for the regulators and the FAA, puts this quote to the very end of its article, almost as an aside. I suspect the outlet would have liked to leave it out.
I have posted the video below, so my readers can listen at their leisure.
» Read more
In reporting the information revealed in an audio report of two SpaceX engineers to Elon Musk, Space News completely misses the main reason Musk posted this video.
The focus of Jeff Foust’s report is the technical problems the engineers revealed that occurred during the descent of Superheavy during the last flight. According to them, one particular parameter related to the Raptor engines was one second away from demanding an abort, whereby the rocket would not attempt to be captured by the tower chopsticks but instead crash along side it. In addition, these engineers reported the worrisome consequences when a chine on the booster ripped off shortly before landing.
All interesting, but the real reason Elon Musk posted this clip from a much longer audio report is what one engineer says about two thirds of the way through:
Given that that is the first launch [#6] in a long time — well, really, ever — that we’ve not been FAA driven, we’re trying to go do a reasonable balance of speed and risk mitigation on the booster, specifically.
Musk wished everyone to know without question the perspective of his employees when it comes to the red tape of the FAA. It hasn’t been our imagination. For the past three years the FAA has determined the test schedule, slowing it down significantly while costing SpaceX a lot of money.
Space News, which generally has been in the tank for the regulators and the FAA, puts this quote to the very end of its article, almost as an aside. I suspect the outlet would have liked to leave it out.
I have posted the video below, so my readers can listen at their leisure.
» Read more