NASA sets tentative launch date for SLS
NASA yesterday announced that it is targeting August 29, 2022 for the first unmanned launch of its SLS rocket.
NASA is tentatively targeting Aug. 29 for the long-awaited maiden flight of the agency’s huge Space Launch System moon rocket, officials said Wednesday. But they cautioned major challenges remain for the oft-delayed rocket and an official date will not be set until later.
As it stands, the launch processing schedule is extremely tight and depends on successful checkout of a repaired hydrogen line fitting, good results from end-to-end pre-flight checks of the rocket’s myriad other systems and getting everything done in time to haul it back out to the launch pad by around Aug. 18.
If any delays occur, this launch window extends until September 6th. If they can’t make that date, the next launch window opens on September 19th.
The mission, to send the Orion capsule around the Moon and back, would last 42 days and if launched as planned would return October 10th.
The announcement also slipped in this tidbit:
If the initial test flight goes well, NASA plans to launch four astronauts atop the second SLS rocket for an around-the-moon shakedown flight in 2024 — Artemis 2 — before sending the first woman and the first person of color to a landing near the moon’s south pole in 2025 or 2026 as part of the Artemis 3 mission. [emphasis mine]
This I think is the first time NASA officials have hinted that the launch might be delayed to ’26. It is no surprise, but as they have always done with SLS, they give these hints softly, prepping the press so that it doesn’t make news.
As for the disgraceful unseemly focus on race and sex, it appears that NASA is now an apartheid state. The make-up of missions will no longer be determined by skill and experience, but by ethnic considerations, with favoritism always given to minorities or women.
Readers!
Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. Your support allows me the freedom and ability to analyze objectively the ongoing renaissance in space, as well as the cultural changes -- for good or ill -- that are happening across America. Fourteen years ago I wrote that SLS and Orion were a bad ideas, a waste of money, would be years behind schedule, and better replaced by commercial private enterprise. Only now does it appear that Washington might finally recognize this reality.
In 2020 when the world panicked over COVID I wrote that the panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Only in the past year have some of our so-called experts in the health field have begun to recognize these facts.
Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.
You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are four ways of doing so:
1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.
2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
3. A Paypal Donation or subscription:
4. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652
You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.
NASA yesterday announced that it is targeting August 29, 2022 for the first unmanned launch of its SLS rocket.
NASA is tentatively targeting Aug. 29 for the long-awaited maiden flight of the agency’s huge Space Launch System moon rocket, officials said Wednesday. But they cautioned major challenges remain for the oft-delayed rocket and an official date will not be set until later.
As it stands, the launch processing schedule is extremely tight and depends on successful checkout of a repaired hydrogen line fitting, good results from end-to-end pre-flight checks of the rocket’s myriad other systems and getting everything done in time to haul it back out to the launch pad by around Aug. 18.
If any delays occur, this launch window extends until September 6th. If they can’t make that date, the next launch window opens on September 19th.
The mission, to send the Orion capsule around the Moon and back, would last 42 days and if launched as planned would return October 10th.
The announcement also slipped in this tidbit:
If the initial test flight goes well, NASA plans to launch four astronauts atop the second SLS rocket for an around-the-moon shakedown flight in 2024 — Artemis 2 — before sending the first woman and the first person of color to a landing near the moon’s south pole in 2025 or 2026 as part of the Artemis 3 mission. [emphasis mine]
This I think is the first time NASA officials have hinted that the launch might be delayed to ’26. It is no surprise, but as they have always done with SLS, they give these hints softly, prepping the press so that it doesn’t make news.
As for the disgraceful unseemly focus on race and sex, it appears that NASA is now an apartheid state. The make-up of missions will no longer be determined by skill and experience, but by ethnic considerations, with favoritism always given to minorities or women.
Readers!
Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. Your support allows me the freedom and ability to analyze objectively the ongoing renaissance in space, as well as the cultural changes -- for good or ill -- that are happening across America. Fourteen years ago I wrote that SLS and Orion were a bad ideas, a waste of money, would be years behind schedule, and better replaced by commercial private enterprise. Only now does it appear that Washington might finally recognize this reality.
In 2020 when the world panicked over COVID I wrote that the panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Only in the past year have some of our so-called experts in the health field have begun to recognize these facts.
Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.
You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are four ways of doing so:
1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.
2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
3. A Paypal Donation or subscription:
4. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652
You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.
Mr. Z. states “The make-up of missions will no longer be determined by skill and experience, but by ethnic considerations, with favoritism always given to minorities or women.”
NASA Public Relations Dept. will probably brand the upcoming manned Moon missions “A Diverse Age of Discovery”.
I would prefer that NASA actually communicate to the tax paying public their answers to a few key questions:
– Why did humans stop going to the moon?
– Why is it important for Humanity to go back to the moon?
– Why should the US lead this effort working together with our partners from the Artemis Accords?
One wit dubbed Artemis “Lady Ghostbusters on the Moon”
What an exciting time for space exploration! NASA has a lot of work and a big decisions coming up. Will the person of color or the woman (whatever that is) be the first to step onto the moon? Perhaps they’ll design two exits and synchronize. Or maybe they’ll combine groups! That would be fabulous! However, we have to ask ourselves where are the transgenders? Maybe it’ll be a surprise reveal. Can’t wait for the sexual orientation analysis of all involved, the kindergartners are really going to be inspired by that. There might not even be any cis genders! This is great, forward progressives, safe space on the freakin moon! Wooo Hooo!
I am wondering if the scientists and engineers could not take 2023 off, I don’t know if I can wait!
I am deeply sorry for not explicitly praising and including homosexuals. It has come to my attention that words are violence, and that was not my intention. I am very excited for the gay astronaut, whatever genders it may be. I have always bowed before LGBTW&X+ pride, and will continue to do so.
” . . . .with favoritism always given to minorities or women.”
And they will live with that stigma the rest of their lives. ‘Did I go because I was good, or because I was [pick one]?’
The detrimental effect of preferential treatment was a big deal. Thirty years ago. Now, no-one cares. Long as they get theirs.
I think both SLS and Starship launch on my Birthday month of Sept.
As the last of the frail, pale, males are retiring from NASA proper, NASA has become increasingly dependent on subcontractors to actually get things done. Since NASA is paying the bills, NASA gets to decide who goes. The Astronaut Office in the era of the Space Shuttle became ridiculously political. NASA is blatantly pandering to the public to insure continued support from Congress.
As long as NASA can pay to keep it’s logo flying, all is well, as long as the value of what gets done is political.