Senate fails to fully fund manned lander for Trump’s 2024 lunar mission
The Senate appropriations committee’s budget recommendations for NASA, released yesterday, has refused to fully fund the development of the manned lander needed for Trump’s 2024 lunar mission.
The Senate Appropriations Committee released its recommendations for all 12 FY2021 appropriations bills today. The Commerce-Justice-Science (CJS) bill provides NASA with $23.5 billion, $1.75 billion less than requested. The House-passed bill keeps the agency at its current level of $22.6 billion, so the final compromise likely will be somewhere in that range. NASA’s request for Human Landing Systems (HLS) for the Artemis program was particularly hard hit on both sides of Capitol Hill.
NASA had requested $3.4 billion for building the lunar lander in time for 2024. The House appropriated $628 million. Today’s Senate recommendation budgeted $1 billion. This practically guarantees that no manned lunar mission will happen by 2024.
None of this is a surprise. The politicians in Congress from both parties don’t really want to rush this program. For them it is better to stretch it out for as long as possible, spending mucho bucks in their states and districts. Nothing will be accomplished, but they will be able to tell their constituents they brought the jobs home.
Useless and empty jobs, but jobs nonetheless.
Readers!
Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. Your support allows me the freedom and ability to analyze objectively the ongoing renaissance in space, as well as the cultural changes -- for good or ill -- that are happening across America. Fourteen years ago I wrote that SLS and Orion were a bad ideas, a waste of money, would be years behind schedule, and better replaced by commercial private enterprise. Only now does it appear that Washington might finally recognize this reality.
In 2020 when the world panicked over COVID I wrote that the panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Only in the past year have some of our so-called experts in the health field have begun to recognize these facts.
Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.
You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are four ways of doing so:
1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.
2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
3. A Paypal Donation or subscription:
4. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652
You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.
The Senate appropriations committee’s budget recommendations for NASA, released yesterday, has refused to fully fund the development of the manned lander needed for Trump’s 2024 lunar mission.
The Senate Appropriations Committee released its recommendations for all 12 FY2021 appropriations bills today. The Commerce-Justice-Science (CJS) bill provides NASA with $23.5 billion, $1.75 billion less than requested. The House-passed bill keeps the agency at its current level of $22.6 billion, so the final compromise likely will be somewhere in that range. NASA’s request for Human Landing Systems (HLS) for the Artemis program was particularly hard hit on both sides of Capitol Hill.
NASA had requested $3.4 billion for building the lunar lander in time for 2024. The House appropriated $628 million. Today’s Senate recommendation budgeted $1 billion. This practically guarantees that no manned lunar mission will happen by 2024.
None of this is a surprise. The politicians in Congress from both parties don’t really want to rush this program. For them it is better to stretch it out for as long as possible, spending mucho bucks in their states and districts. Nothing will be accomplished, but they will be able to tell their constituents they brought the jobs home.
Useless and empty jobs, but jobs nonetheless.
Readers!
Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. Your support allows me the freedom and ability to analyze objectively the ongoing renaissance in space, as well as the cultural changes -- for good or ill -- that are happening across America. Fourteen years ago I wrote that SLS and Orion were a bad ideas, a waste of money, would be years behind schedule, and better replaced by commercial private enterprise. Only now does it appear that Washington might finally recognize this reality.
In 2020 when the world panicked over COVID I wrote that the panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Only in the past year have some of our so-called experts in the health field have begun to recognize these facts.
Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.
You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are four ways of doing so:
1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.
2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
3. A Paypal Donation or subscription:
4. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652
You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.
This is bad. If they do not push the schedule, then it opens the door to infinite delays, and eventual cancellation.
My own cynical prediction: President Harris cancels the program.
I see in their infinite wisdom, the committee managed to approved $0.3 billion for an SLS-upper-stage-to-nowhere.
If Elon is successful with Starship development, perhaps it lowers the cost enough for a “The Man Who Sold the Moon” scenario. Perhaps Elon is Delos Harriman or someone else plays that role using Starship or a variant.
If SpaceX gets to the Moon with Starship before NASA gets there on SLS, I wonder whether SpaceX will wait for NASA to put the first woman on the Moon or if they will do so themselves.
Edward, I once spoke with a woman who had begun her career as a quite successful and respected architect at a time when women architects were few. I was instructed to ask her about any women’s architect groups she supported and her thoughts on mentoring more women into the profession. Her polite reply after a period of thoughtful silence: “I have never been part of any women’s architect organizations, though I do belong to the major architectural associations. I have never seen what being a woman has to do with it. There is only one thing that’s important, and that is: are you a professional?”
Would SpaceX move more quickly in developing their Starship if they were to get more NASA funding? It appears as though they are moving as quickly as possible now.
Would Blue Origin move less slowly if they were to get additional NASA funding? $1 B/yr of Bezos’ sold stock is quite a bit. Would $1 B + $1 B significantly speed them up?
Dynetics in the other hand could really use the money and doesn’t have as much moola to spend sans NASA funding.
DougSpace asked (rhetorically?): “Would $1 B + $1 B significantly speed them up?”
I suspect that if it could speed them up then Bezos would spend that much more on Blue Origin. Blue Origin is probably working as fast as it can, which is slower than SpaceX because of their very different corporate cultures.
janyuary,
I’m going to take your story as meaning that you don’t think SpaceX will wait for NASA but will put together the best crews for their lunar missions.
“I have never been part of any women’s architect organizations, though I do belong to the major architectural associations. I have never seen what being a woman has to do with it. There is only one thing that’s important, and that is: are you a professional?”
A perfect answer. One that the very good Netflix series, “The Queen’s Gambit” gets into as well.
Larry Elder tells a story of two golf pros asked “how do you determine a good golfer?”
The first talks about a good stance, the proper backswing, hand placement, a good follow through etc.
The second says, “I look to see where the ball lands”.
I am so sick and tired of gender/race etc. instead of results that I could just scream.
You either get the ball where it needs to go or you don’t.
My guess is that China will be putting humans on the Moon, next.
Alternatively Private (Musk/Bezos) will beat NASA and China to land humans on the Moon.
Musk will put a Tesla rover on the Moon.
Edward, I’m puzzled: “I’m going to take your story as meaning that you don’t think SpaceX will wait for NASA but will put together the best crews for their lunar missions.”
From my POV, putting together the best crew precludes considering a crew member’s sex as significant in such a mission.
eddie: excellent, isn’t elder wonderful
janyuary,
I am confused by your puzzlement. My sentence and your point of view are equivalent.
The upper stage will be for outer solar probes to be orbiters instead of fly-by missions.
That is where SLS will shine, once bugs are worked out