To read this post please scroll down.

 

Readers! A November fund-raising drive!

 

It is unfortunately time for another November fund-raising campaign to support my work here at Behind the Black. I really dislike doing these, but 2025 is so far turning out to be a very poor year for donations and subscriptions, the worst since 2020. I very much need your support for this webpage to survive.

 

And I think I provide real value. Fifteen years ago I said SLS was garbage and should be cancelled. Almost a decade ago I said Orion was a lie and a bad idea. As early as 1998, long before almost anyone else, I predicted in my first book, Genesis: The Story of Apollo 8, that private enterprise and freedom would conquer the solar system, not government. Very early in the COVID panic and continuing throughout I noted that every policy put forth by the government (masks, social distancing, lockdowns, jab mandates) was wrong, misguided, and did more harm than good. In planetary science, while everyone else in the media still thinks Mars has no water, I have been reporting the real results from the orbiters now for more than five years, that Mars is in fact a planet largely covered with ice.

 

I could continue with numerous other examples. If you want to know what others will discover a decade hence, read what I write here at Behind the Black. And if you read my most recent book, Conscious Choice, you will find out what is going to happen in space in the next century.

 

 

This last claim might sound like hubris on my part, but I base it on my overall track record.

 

So please consider donating or subscribing to Behind the Black, either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. I could really use the support at this time. There are five ways of doing so:

 

1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.

 

2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation. Takes about a 10% cut.
 

3. A Paypal Donation or subscription, which takes about a 15% cut:

 

4. Donate by check. I get whatever you donate. Make the check payable to Robert Zimmerman and mail it to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.


Superheavy prototype #7 and Starship prototype #24 undergo static fire tests

Superheavy #7's first launchpad engine test
Click for original photo.

Capitalism in space: SpaceX engineers yesterday performed static fire tests of both its Superheavy prototype #7 and its Starship prototype #24.

The Superheavy prototype fired one engine, and did so only a few weeks after that prototype experienced an explosive event the launchpad during earlier fueling/engine tests. Yesterday’s engine test was the first time any Superheavy prototype had fired its engines on the launchpad.

The Starship prototype meanwhile fired two engines on a nearby vertical test stand.

SpaceX’s plan is to stack #24 on top of #7 and attempt an orbital launch test that will have the Superheavy prototype land in the Gulf of Mexico while the Starship prototype reaches orbit and then returns to Earth in the Pacific northeast of Hawaii. Based on the company’s normal pace of operations, that flight is probably only weeks away. However, before that flight engineers will have to do a full static fire test of all 33 of #7 engines, and then like do it again with Starship #24 stacked on top.

Genesis cover

On Christmas Eve 1968 three Americans became the first humans to visit another world. What they did to celebrate was unexpected and profound, and will be remembered throughout all human history. Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8, Robert Zimmerman's classic history of humanity's first journey to another world, tells that story, and it is now available as both an ebook and an audiobook, both with a foreword by Valerie Anders and a new introduction by Robert Zimmerman.

 

The print edition can be purchased at Amazon or from any other book seller. If you want an autographed copy the price is $60 for the hardback and $45 for the paperback, plus $8 shipping for each. Go here for purchasing details. The ebook is available everywhere for $5.99 (before discount) at amazon, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. If you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and the author gets a bigger cut much sooner.


The audiobook is also available at all these vendors, and is also free with a 30-day trial membership to Audible.
 

"Not simply about one mission, [Genesis] is also the history of America's quest for the moon... Zimmerman has done a masterful job of tying disparate events together into a solid account of one of America's greatest human triumphs."--San Antonio Express-News

13 comments

  • Ray Van Dune

    I wonder if there is true value in test firing all 33 booster engines simultaneously, as opposed to incrementally, perhaps in groups. There is no doubt that a firing of all 33 at once would create a greater amount of blast and sonic forces that doing so piecemeal, but depending on the firing duration, it could perhaps do more damage than an actual launch.

    This concern comes from the fact that the Starship has a relatively high thrust / weight ratio, meaning it will accelerate upward off the pad at a fairly high climb rate for a large rocket, faster than the Saturn 5 for instance. In turn this means that forces directed down onto the launch platform will also reduce faster than the Saturn 5.

    So a (say) 5-second all-engine static fire could generate significantly more pressure and damage than an actual blastoff, where the rocket would have nearly cleared the tower after 5 seconds.

    For this reason I believe any all-engine static fire will be extremely brief if it occurs at all, and that a full-duration all-engine static fire would be essentially impossible.

  • Ray Van Dune: Excellent points. Based on your analysis, it seems more likely that SpaceX will do staggered static fire tests, and reserve the full firing for the launch itself.

  • Ray Van Dune

    And what would make sense as a “staggered” testing principle?

    So looking up from the bottom in the famous 33-nozzle picture, as I recall we see 20, 10, and finally 3 engines from the outer rim to the center. Think of it as a giant pie containing 33 huge berries!

    Remember that all engines have been individually tested at McGregor, so what we primarily want to test is that we have mitigated the impact of adjacent engines on each other, and on adjacent vehicle structure. The best way to do that (without lighting everything off) might be to test the engines in each “slice” of the berry pie! This looks at a population of engines and their close mates both radially and laterally. About 4-6 slices should do it.

    Of course this assumes we re-verified all engines after the recent explosive anomaly, and replaced any damaged ones with fresh fruit!! Looked at this way, it could be a month of testing, even doing the Ship in parallel.

  • sippin_bourbon

    Meanwhile:

    SpaceX has lost its bid for nearly $900 million in rural broadband subsidies for its Starlink broadband service.

    https://spacenews.com/spacex-loses-900-million-rural-broadband-subsidy/

  • Ray Van Dune: It is my understanding that when launched, the engines on Superheavy will not all fire at the same exact second, but their ignition will be staged in groups several microseconds apart, for numerous reasons.

    I don’t remember the breakdown of that staging, but I would expect if they stagger the static fires, they will do it to match that launch staging.

  • sippin_bourbon: This deserves a post on the main page. Thank you.

  • Ray Van Dune

    Bob Zimmerman, yes I understand that such engine start phasing is used even on the Falcon 9 and Heavy, to reduce instantaneous startup shocks.

    It might indeed make sense to follow the same pattern. But OTOH the purpose of the hypothetical testing we are speculating about could be best served by amplifying any problem interactions, not reduce them, could it not? Just a guess.

  • Trent Castanaveras

    It also appears that SpaceX has ambitiously reserved the possibility for a Super Heavy catch on the debut launch to orbit, at least in a recent FCC filing:

    https://www.tesmanian.com/blogs/tesmanian-blog/flight-profile

  • Ray Van Dune

    Well, it occurs to me that with the huge thrust that these Raptors can generate, any off-center group firing alone would probably destroy the whole vehicle… I feel pretty stupid!

  • Diane E Wilson

    Launch license granted; launch window open September 1.

    My understanding is that they can’t do a full 33 engine static fire with anything less than a fully fueled booster with a fully fueled Starship with cargo, mounted on top of the booster. Too much thrust with just the booster alone; the launch mount can’t hold it down.

  • ” . . .the launch mount can’t hold it down.”

    Just send in some White people.

  • Diane E Wilson: Do you have a link to this info?

  • Star Bird

    When you bring Matter and Anti-Matter together you get a big time Explosion

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *