“Self-confessed liar publishes more dubious stem-cell work.”
The sad state of science: “Self-confessed liar publishes more dubious stem-cell work.”
That’s an actual Nature headline. Worse, the publication that published the new papers — which were plagiarized from already retracted papers — is peer-reviewed, which illustrates how seriously they take that review process — not!
The sad state of science: “Self-confessed liar publishes more dubious stem-cell work.”
That’s an actual Nature headline. Worse, the publication that published the new papers — which were plagiarized from already retracted papers — is peer-reviewed, which illustrates how seriously they take that review process — not!