Conscious Choice cover

From the press release: In this ground-breaking new history of early America, historian Robert Zimmerman not only exposes the lie behind The New York Times 1619 Project that falsely claims slavery is central to the history of the United States, he also provides profound lessons about the nature of human societies, lessons important for Americans today as well as for all future settlers on Mars and elsewhere in space.

Conscious Choice: The origins of slavery in America and why it matters today and for our future in outer space, is a riveting page-turning story that documents how slavery slowly became pervasive in the southern British colonies of North America, colonies founded by a people and culture that not only did not allow slavery but in every way were hostile to the practice.  
Conscious Choice does more however. In telling the tragic history of the Virginia colony and the rise of slavery there, Zimmerman lays out the proper path for creating healthy societies in places like the Moon and Mars.


“Zimmerman’s ground-breaking history provides every future generation the basic framework for establishing new societies on other worlds. We would be wise to heed what he says.” —Robert Zubrin, founder of founder of the Mars Society.


Available everywhere for $3.99 (before discount) at Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and all ebook vendors, or direct from the ebook publisher, ebookit. And if you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and I get a bigger cut much sooner.

House passes bill to cancel all regulations created during Obama’s lame duck rule

I like this: The House today passed a bill that would allow Congress to repeal all regulations created during the last sixty days of the Obama administration.

Legislation to allow Congress to repeal in a single vote any rule finalized in the last 60 legislative days of the Obama administration sailed through the House Wednesday, the second time in less than two months. The GOP-backed Midnight Rule Relief Act, which passed the previous Congress in November, was approved largely along party lines by a vote of 238-184 on the second day of the new Congress, despite Democratic opposition. If passed by the Senate and signed by President-elect Donald Trump, the legislation would amend the Congressional Review Act to allow lawmakers to bundle together multiple rules and overturn them en masse with a joint resolution of disapproval.

What is disturbing is how few regulations Congress has cancelled over the decades. This is supposed to be an republic, whereby the rules are set by our elected officials. Instead, they have passed that responsibility off to bureaucrats, and when they hint, as they do here, that they might take back some of that power, the howls of outrage are deafening.


Please consider donating to Behind the Black, by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar below. Your support will allow me to continue covering science and culture as I have for the past twenty years, independent and free from any outside influence.

Your support is even more essential to me because I keep this site free from advertisements and do not participate in corrupt social media companies like Google, Twitter, and Facebook. I depend wholly on the direct support of my readers.

You can provide that support to Behind The Black with a contribution via Patreon or PayPal. To use Patreon, go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation. For PayPal click one of the following buttons:


Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:


If Patreon or Paypal don't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to

Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652


  • LocalFluff

    I saw Gingrich on Fox several weeks ago saying that exactly such a law was passed when he was speaker in the 1990s. Exactly 60 days, leaving a gap of almost two weeks after the election, which I thought was strange. Maybe it was a temporary law? Anyway, it seems to be an established and expected way of doing politics.

  • Laurie

    While I don’t doubt the corpus of regulatory law established by the Obama administration at the close of its second term is, largely, at odds with the best interests of the American public, overturning said regulations in this fashion smacks of pure partisanship. What, if you can’t beat ’em, join ’em? Sure this is more efficient in the short term, but it further erodes any opportunity to extend and olive branch across the isle.

  • Mike Borgelt

    Screw olive branches. No prisoners!

  • Trumpster

    There has never been any cooperation in Congress and never will be. Liberals will never accept an Olive Branch, unless it exclusively benefits them. It’s time for the adults to run the show now and clean house. Liberals are now at the kiddie table where they belong. When dealing with petulant children, you send them to their rooms until they learn to behave. There’s no Olive Branch when you are at war….and this is war.

  • wayne

    Agree on not cooperating, at all, with the Democrat party.

    -Mitch McConnell however, doesn’t think we are at political war and he is in charge of the Senate and Mitch has already proclaimed he will NOT waive the filibuster rule for judicial nominees.
    – Rinse Prius is going to be Chief of Staff, and the new Head of Personnel is a John Bonher acolyte.

    Mark Levin:
    “Schumer says Dems will work with Trump only if he moves completely in their direction.”

  • wayne

    Congress gave up huge amounts of their power/authority, when they created the 4th Branch, the Administrative State Apparatchik .
    The Democrat Party loves it, ‘cuz they enshrine their agenda in law, whether they are in power or not.
    The RINO’s love it, ‘cuz they endless fundraise against it, knowing full well when it’s their chance, they will just use it to benefit their crony friends.

  • Laurie

    (Aisle not isle, though no man/party is an island)

    If there cannot be genuine dialogue then, indeed, the form and function of the congress is just window dressing. Let’s avoid that if at all possible. Surely reason can show itself to be reasonable.

    If I may, the following comes to mind, “It must needs be that offences come, but woe unto the man by whom the offence cometh.”

    I’m not advocating compromise nor am I defending the system, I’m (hopefully) defending any future peace me might have.

Readers: the rules for commenting!


No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.


However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.


Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *