Scroll down to read this post.


Please consider supporting my work here at Behind The Black by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, in any one of the following ways:


1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.


2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.

3. A Paypal Donation:

4. A Paypal subscription:

5. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

NASA awards $370 million to 14 companies to develop new space capabilities

Capitalism in space: NASA yesterday issued fifteen development contracts to fourteen private space companies, totaling $370 million, to help them develop a variety of new space capabilities.

The funding is spread across 15 contracts to 14 different companies, including SpaceX, Astrobotic, Lockheed Martin, United Launch Alliance and Intuitive Machines.

Nearly 70% of the money is earmarked for the management of cryogenic fluids such as liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen. SpaceX, for example, will get $53 million for an in-space demonstration that will transfer 11 tons (10 metric tons) of liquid oxygen between tanks on one of its next-gen Starship vehicles.

What makes these contracts different from past NASA development contracts is fundamental. First, the design work comes from the companies, not NASA. Therefore products will be designed with the company’s needs in mind, not the government’s, and will also likely be designed faster and more efficiently.

Second, the companies will own what they build, and will be able to sell or use it however they wish. SpaceX for example wants this capability to give Starship the ability to leave Earth orbit, for its own commercial flights.

Conscious Choice cover

Now available in hardback and paperback as well as ebook!


From the press release: In this ground-breaking new history of early America, historian Robert Zimmerman not only exposes the lie behind The New York Times 1619 Project that falsely claims slavery is central to the history of the United States, he also provides profound lessons about the nature of human societies, lessons important for Americans today as well as for all future settlers on Mars and elsewhere in space.

Conscious Choice: The origins of slavery in America and why it matters today and for our future in outer space, is a riveting page-turning story that documents how slavery slowly became pervasive in the southern British colonies of North America, colonies founded by a people and culture that not only did not allow slavery but in every way were hostile to the practice.  
Conscious Choice does more however. In telling the tragic history of the Virginia colony and the rise of slavery there, Zimmerman lays out the proper path for creating healthy societies in places like the Moon and Mars.


“Zimmerman’s ground-breaking history provides every future generation the basic framework for establishing new societies on other worlds. We would be wise to heed what he says.” —Robert Zubrin, founder of founder of the Mars Society.


All editions available at Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and all book vendors. The ebook can be purchased direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit, in which case you don't support the big tech companies and I get a bigger cut much sooner. Note that the price for the ebook, $3.99, goes up to $5.99 on September 1, 2022.


Autographed printed copies are also available at discount directly from me (hardback $24.95; paperback $14.95). Just email me at zimmerman @ nasw dot org.


  • Ray Van Dune

    OT, sorry, but timely… what’s going on with Falcon 9? We have two F9 launches, using new boosters I believe, that are being delayed. The recent last-minute abort of a USSF GPS launch was apparently caused by an anomalous reading from a Merlin engine turbopump, and has yet to be rescheduled, at least there is no mention of such on the SpaceX website. An abundance of caution seems to have pushed back the next Crew Dragon launch from October 31 to sometime in November. Again, nothing on And could it be significant that the recent successful StarLink launch used a “flight-proven” booster?

    So we have the potential of 18 (or 20) new Merlins with some unspecified turbopump problem, holding up two big missions, but I haven’t heard anything about it in the media (I don’t do Facebook or Twitter). Has anyone else? This highlights a perhaps under-appreciated consequence of using 9/10-engined boosters… if you find a flaw, it is liable to impact a lot of engines all at once! They are unlikely to have a bunch of turbopumps sitting on the shelf, and even if they did, how many hours does it take to tear down, inspect, and possibly replace and retest one?

    Imagine if they had two Falcon Heavy missions on hold?! “Yo, Hawthorn! I need 60 new pumps down here, stat!!”

  • Ray Van Dune

    Ps. Of course, a Falcon Heavy would “only” have 28 pumps! So they would need 56 replacements, not 60.

  • Dick Eagleson

    Considering that the booster in question had previously been static fired, I think the odds of a bad sensor are appreciably higher than the odds of a bad turbopump. preburner. SpaceX will announce its findings before the rocket flies, but isn’t likely to say anything in the meantime.

Readers: the rules for commenting!


No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.


However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.


Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.