Freedom: What Trump’s election will mean for America’s space policy
The resounding landslide victory by Donald Trump and the Republicans yesterday is going have enormous consequences across the entire federal government. As a space historian and journalist who has been following, studying, and reporting on space policy for decades, this essay will be my attempt to elucidate what that landslide will mean for NASA, its Artemis program, and the entire American aerospace industry.
The absurd cost of each SLS launch
The Artemis Program
Since 2011 I have said over and over that the government-designed and owned SLS, Orion, and later proposed Lunar Gateway space station were all badly conceived. They all cost too much and don’t do the job. Fitting them together to create a long term presence in space is difficult at best and mostly impractical. Their cost and cumbersome design has meant the program to get back to the Moon, as first proposed by George Bush Jr. in 2004, is now more than a decade behind schedule and many billions over budget. Worse, under the present program as currently contrived that manned lunar landing will likely be delayed five more years, at a minimum.
For example, at present SLS is underpowered. It can’t get astronauts to and from the Moon, as the Saturn-5 rocket did in the 1960s. For the first manned lunar landing mission, Artemis-4, SLS will simply launch four astronauts in Orion to lunar orbit, where Orion will rendezvous and dock with the lunar lander version of Starship. That Starship in turn will require refueling in Earth orbit, using a proposed fuel depot that has been filled by multiple earlier Starship launches.
Once Starship is docked to Orion the crew will transfer to Starship to get up and down from the Moon, and then return to Earth in Orion.
You think that’s complicated? Later lunar missions will require Orion and Starship to dock with the Lunar Gateway station to do these crew transfers. To do this however will require that Gateway be built, launched, and assembled in lunar orbit, something that has never been done before.
Under a new Trump administration, working with advice directly from Elon Musk, I predict that the entire Artemis program will be drastically restructured. SLS and Orion will be eliminated completely. Starship can do the job for all, and do it cheaper, quicker, more simply, and with much greater capabilities. For example, while each SLS launch is expected to cost about $4 billion, Starship launches will cost far less than $50 million, and maybe far less. For the same money NASA will be able to fly dozens more missions, and do so fast.
Whether Lunar Gateway will remain is unclear. It has its uses but of a limited kind. Right now SpaceX has the contract to use its Falcon Heavy to launch the station’s two main modules, so Musk might thus advise keeping the station, but reshape it to use commercial rockets, such as Starship, Falcon Heavies, and possibly New Glenn (once operational), for resupply and crew ferrying. Most certainly it will be separated from the lunar base project. Crews might go to both, but missions to the lunar surface will no longer be required to dock with Gateway first.
If this happens the U.S. will likely return to the Moon much faster, and for a much lower cost. And the change will enliven America’s entire aerospace industry. The jobs lost in the federal government and NASA by eliminating Orion and SLS will be overwhelmed by the new jobs created in hundreds of new space companies providing service and product to each other and NASA.
Deregulation
During Trump’s first term he imposed a complete halt to the issuance of new regulations by the federal bureaucracy. Though he left the staffing of most agencies alone, in certain cases, such as the EPA, he aggressively worked to reduce its power and staffing.
Expect Trump’s anti-regulation hammer to strike with much greater force in his second administration. In regards to space, expect the immediate elimination of the FAA’s Part 450 regulations that it imposed in 2021, supposedly to “streamline” things. Instead, it has choked off all new development, and slowed the efforts of already established companies significantly. I expect Trump to cancel it quickly, based on advice from Musk, who has been directly impacted by its absurd rules and also has good inside knowledge of how it has impacted everyone else in the rocket business.
Similarly, expect Trump to neuter the efforts of the FCC to expand its regulatory authority into areas where it has no statutory authority, such as regulating the de-orbiting of satellites. This regulatory mission creep will stop, accompanied quite possible with major staffing cuts.
The result, if done successfully, will be an end to the regulatory burdens that since 2021 have shut down new rocket companies in the U.S. This in turn might help renew investment in such companies, something that dried up in the past three years, partly because of rocket failures but just as much because investors saw these new rocket companies hindered so much by those regulations that success had become questionable if not impossible.
Freedom to go to Mars or anywhere
By eliminating the ability of the administrative state to obstruct new development, expect SpaceX to quickly fly many Starship/Superheavy test flights, at least one every two months, so that it can get that rocket to operationality by the end of next year. The company will then proceed with Musk’s plan to fly one or more Starships to Mars in the first launch window in 2026, and to follow with more Starships in every subsequent launch window every two years hence.
Finally the only thing stopping Musk from his dream of dying on Mars will engineering problems. He will be able to function like all Americans once did, freely and following his own dreams.
“Proclaim liberty throughout all the land unto all
the inhabitants thereof.” Photo credit: William Zhang
Or to put it more grandly, Trump’s space policy will essentially get the government out of the way of everybody, thus allowing Americans and private enterprise to step up to do the task, in its own way and as it wishes. Though this resurgence will begin with SpaceX dominating the field, others will quickly rise to the challenge, and we shall see a cornucopia of new private space missions, some to the Moon, some to the asteroids, some to Mars, and some to Venus.
Nor am I talking through my hat. Private companies are already developing and even building missions to all these places. The freedom that Trump will create will energize all these projects.
This new birth of freedom will also help the four commercial space stations presently under development. Every one of these stations will provide infrastructure needed for all those interplanetary projects. They will thus suddenly have more customers then they will know what to do with, which will in turn further their own success.
Or to put it another way freedom will mean that demand will exceed supply, the ideal situation for promoting fast and exuberant growth.
As always, freedom works. It raises all boats, and makes everyone prosper. And this fact is likely what Trump’s space policy will bring to America, more than anything else.
Hardly the actions of a tyrant, I’d say.
The support of my readers through the years has given me the freedom and ability to analyze objectively the ongoing renaissance in space, as well as the cultural changes -- for good or ill -- that are happening across America. Four years ago, just before the 2020 election I wrote that Joe Biden's mental health was suspect. Only in this year has the propaganda mainstream media decided to recognize that basic fact.
Fourteen years ago I wrote that SLS and Orion were a bad ideas, a waste of money, would be years behind schedule, and better replaced by commercial private enterprise. Even today NASA and Congress refuse to recognize this reality.
In 2020 when the world panicked over COVID I wrote that the panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Only in the past year have some of our so-called experts in the health field have begun to recognize these facts.
Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.
Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black.
You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are five ways of doing so:
1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.
2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
3. A Paypal Donation:
5. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652
You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above. And if you buy the books through the ebookit links, I get a larger cut and I get it sooner.
In 1905, an aerospace engineer might have a career building and flying dozens of aircraft designs, many of them of his own design and manufacture. In the 50s-late 70s, high powered aerospace firms, like Lockheed Martin skunk-works managed a similar pace, even though powered largely by defense spending. Now an aerospace engineer might go for a 30 year career and never see the thing he works on be completed. Generations before project completion clearly exceeds some sort of timeout limit for the propagation, not to mention the experimentation and production of human skill and knowledge. Design and development requires experiment and iteration.
As an aerospace engineer, I’ve been trapped like a fly in bureaucratic amber for most of my career. From the late 70s, picking up serious speed in the 80s and 90s, the functional parts of our aerospace industry died, leaving behind some zombie simulacra that only apes the form.
Related:
WINNING (REMEMBER TO BE HUMBLE)
https://www.sigma3ioc.com/post/winning-remember-to-be-humble
Buh bye Bill Nelson. His teeth are clacking as fast as they can.
Your assessment is very astute. Not to mention the accelerated development of private space stations and orbital astronomy (one of your favs) that will benefit from the heavy-lift capabilities of Starship.
I only wonder how many flights of Starship will it take before someone gets the chance (and has the stones) to ride it to orbit and back. The flip maneuver required for ship catching will be quite the gut-wrencher. But they’re already making mods to flight 6 to see if they can make space on the sides for extendable catching pins (they have to be retracted for re-entry).
But, we shall soon see. As SpaceX says, “excitement guaranteed”!