Scroll down to read this post.

 

Readers!

 

The time has come for my annual short pre-Thanksgiving/Christmas fund drive for Behind The Black. I must do this every year in order to make sure I have earned enough money to pay my bills.

 

For this two-week campaign, I am offering a special deal to encourage donations. Donations of $200 will get a free autographed copy of the new paperback edition of Genesis: The Story of Apollo 8, while donations of $250 will get a free autographed copy of the new hardback edition. If you desire a copy, make sure you provide me your address with your donation.

 

As I noted in July, the support of my readers through the years has given me the freedom and ability to analyze objectively the ongoing renaissance in space, as well as the cultural changes -- for good or ill -- that are happening across America. Fourteen years ago I wrote that SLS and Orion were a bad ideas, a waste of money, would be years behind schedule, and better replaced by commercial private enterprise. Only now does it appear that Washington might finally recognize this reality.

 

In 2020 when the world panicked over COVID I wrote that the panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Only in the past year have some of our so-called experts in the health field have begun to recognize these facts.

 

Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.

 

Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are four ways of doing so:

 

1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.

 

2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
 

3. A Paypal Donation or subscription:

 

4. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.


Stratolaunch to fly in 2017?

The competition heats up: In an interview Paul Allen has revealed that he hopes to begin flight tests of his gigantic Stratolaunch airplane, the largest ever built, later this year.

No word on the rocket that this air-launched system would launch, however. In fact, it appears that no one seems interested in providing one. This could change once the plane is flying.

Genesis cover

On Christmas Eve 1968 three Americans became the first humans to visit another world. What they did to celebrate was unexpected and profound, and will be remembered throughout all human history. Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8, Robert Zimmerman's classic history of humanity's first journey to another world, tells that story, and it is now available as both an ebook and an audiobook, both with a foreword by Valerie Anders and a new introduction by Robert Zimmerman.

 

The print edition can be purchased at Amazon. from any other book seller, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. The ebook is available everywhere for $5.99 (before discount) at amazon, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. If you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and the author gets a bigger cut much sooner.


The audiobook is also available at all these vendors, and is also free with a 30-day trial membership to Audible.
 

"Not simply about one mission, [Genesis] is also the history of America's quest for the moon... Zimmerman has done a masterful job of tying disparate events together into a solid account of one of America's greatest human triumphs."--San Antonio Express-News

4 comments

  • Gealon

    My area of engineering does not extend to aerospace, but I do understand structures under dynamic loads and I feel compelled to point out, my opinion of course, that the design of this plane is unsafe. To have three such heavy loads, (the left and right fuselages and the rocket) all supported by a single wing structure at the center of gravity of the entire airframe, introduces not only significant stress on the wing, but without bracing to prevent twisting of the fuselages relative to each other, this design is a recipe for loss of vehicle and crew. To expect the wing to be able to stand up to the torsion load of this multi-ton aircraft oscillating in flight (with one fuselage pitching up and the other down) is unrealistic. The aircraft would twist apart at either the inner wing roots or somewhere along the inner wing.

    There is an easy fix to stabilize any of these gyrations of the aircraft and that would be to connect the tail booms with a single airfoil, like for example on the P-38. Connecting the tails in this manner would afford the connecting structure leverage over the bulk of the airframes and allow it to prevent any of the twisting motions I foresee being the doom of this aircraft. The airfoil though would have to be raised above the attached rocket however, not because of the danger of rocket exhaust, as the engines do not fire until after release, but rather to give the foil a clean airstream in which to operate, which the rocket would disrupt.

    Observing the vehicle I can only imagine that this feature was not implemented so as to save on development time, as it would require a new vertical stabilizer/rudder designed to support the foil. This to me is surprising as it seems a fairly rudimentary thing to pick up on, this aircraft is big, heavy, will be under tremendous loads and is going to twist apart the moment one fuselage pitches up or down relative to the other. Why not build in some air frame stability? Instead what I’m seeing here is a push to keep as much of the existing aircraft as possible, ie, keeping all of the original aero-surfaces on the tails. Now I can’t say for certain if the tails were redesigned from the information I have at hand, I do see a square structure at the base of the vertical stabilizer that I’m pretty sure is not standard on a 747, but if they were redesigned, then why overlook such a glaring defect?

  • Dick Eagleson

    The Stratolaunch aircraft is a Burt Rutan design. It’s pretty much a very large evolution of his prior White Knight and White Knight 2 designs, both of which fly just fine. The mass of all three aircraft seems to be concentrated fairly close to the wing roots. The fuel tankage, I believe, is in the wings and both fuselages, but, in the latter case, doesn’t extent too far back or forward from the wing roots. None of Rutan’s rocket carrier aircraft designs would appear to be good candidates in which to go hurricane hunting, but in normal conditions, they show no tendency to twist apart in flight either. Carbon fiber composites are very light and can stand a lot of torsional stress. So much so, in fact, that many modern race cars use carbon fiber composite tubes as driveshafts.

    If you haven’t followed the history of this project, you can be forgiven for misunderstanding some things about it, especially given that the accompanying illustration is badly out of date and represents an early version of the design and not what the plane looks like now, though the two fuselages remain untied at both front and back. The plane does, indeed, incorporate componentry from two 747’s, but no elements of either donor plane’s airframe are incorporated except for engine nacelles and – possibly – engine pylons. I’m not certain about the latter. The original design of the twin fuselages made them appear, in profile, to be narrowed, slab-sided versions of the 747 fuselage’s shape. Even then, though, none of the donor plane’s airframe components were planned for repurposing. Subsequent refinement to the design, based on CFD and wind tunnel work, now have the twin fuselage profiles looking more like the CGI flying reptiles ridden by the nine ghost kings in the Lord of the Rings film trilogy than of anything else that comes readily to mind.

    Besides powerplants, the borrowings from the donor planes are mainly landing gear and one flight deck. The Stratolaunch airframe is entirely bespoke and constructed, as previously noted here, of carbon fiber composite, not metal.

  • pzatchok

    I do believe White night developed wing stress fractures to the point that it could not fly for a year until it was fixed.

    And even now they are not actually overworking it.

    Ever see a fully loaded B-52 take off?
    It looks like a gooney bird. Wings flapping and the fuselage going up and down. Its a fully metal wing and they still watch for stress fractures even after 50 years of proven flight time.

    Carbon fiber is nice but has a huge problem. When it fails it goes spectacularly.
    It also needs to be thinker to be just as stiff as metal of the same weight.

  • Edward

    Gealon,
    In undergrad classes, we learned to analyze stresses for homogenous materials. Homogeneity allowed us to ignore some terms in the general stress equation, greatly simplifying stress analyses.

    When I later took an introductory composites class, the first thing that the professor did was to reintroduce those extra terms, complicating the calculations and concepts. Cross-coupling stresses not only complicate the equations, but can add beneficial reactions to a design.

    Although I eventually did not do a lot of work with composite materials, I worked with an engineer who had used the cross coupling factor in helicopter blades. As the rotor increased in speed, the radial forces of the blades were used to induce a twist to part or all of each blade in order to reduce the angle of attack at the faster, outer parts of the blade. It worked nicely, but the military customer did not go with the design, because — as pzatchok pointed out — composites do not handle damage (e.g. anti aircraft attack) as well as the homogenous metals do. A hole shot into a metal blade is just a hole, but tests demonstrated that a hole in a composite blade can result in the blade ripping itself apart in a catastrophic way.

    Scaled Composites may be using this cross-coupling in order to add strength to the structure or to counter the twisting forces that have you, Gealon, so concerned.

    Although my preference in design is similar to yours, in that I would prefer to use the geometry of the design to assure structural strength and reliability, I would hate to second guess Scaled Composites, as they have a large amount of experience in the design of composite aircraft in general and some amount of experience in the similarly designed White Knight and White Knight Two. It could be that Scaled Composites believes that they save more weight and get sufficient strength through creative composite design than through using the rectangular frame geometry that you and I would prefer.

    pzatchok wrote: “Its a fully metal wing and they still watch for stress fractures even after 50 years of proven flight time.

    At this point, they are looking for fatigue fracturing in the B-52, rather than simple stress fracturing. I once had a window seat in a Boeing 707, and its wingtips also flapped throughout the entire flight. I would guess that designs of large jets, in those early days, did not include stiff wings.

    Stiffness of composite structures is less dependent upon thickness and weight, as metal structures are, but are more dependent upon the design of the layup. An advantage of composites is lighter weight for equivalent strength, but a disadvantage of less survivability due to small damages or construction flaws. A small flaw in the construction of the X-33 fuel tank resulted in delamination during test, which resulted in the demise of that project.

    Apparently, funding has similarities to composites in that it, too, is especially susceptible to failure.

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *