Sunspot update: The hot streak continues
This past weekend NOAA released its monthly update of its graph showing the Sun’s sunspot activity, with the new update covering the period through the end of June 2021. As I have done since I began this website eleven years ago, I post that monthly graph below, annotated to show the previous solar cycle predictions and thus provide context.
In June the hot streak of sunspot activity exceeding the prediction of NOAA’s solar science panel continued, with activity rising again after a tiny dip in May. Except for two months, since 2019 the number of sunspots each month has consistently exceeded the prediction. Furthermore, the ramp up of activity has been faster than expected.
The graph above has been modified to show the predictions of the solar science community for the previous solar maximum. The green curves show the community’s two original predictions from April 2007 for the previous maximum, with half the scientists predicting a very strong maximum and half predicting a weak one. The blue curve is their revised May 2009 prediction. The red curve is the new prediction, first posted by NOAA in April 2020.
Despite this hot streak, the difference so far between the prediction and the actual sunspot count is not very much. Should this pace of activity continue through maximum, the overall maximum, though higher than expected, will not be much higher than the previous solar maximum, which was one of the weakest in a century.
In other words, the Sun is still under-performing. Moreover, it is still too soon to say whether the prediction of NOAA’s panel, as indicated by the red curve, is wrong. It is not unusual for the monthly fluctuations to swing above and below such prediction curves. Given time, the overall curve could still match quite closely.
Nonetheless, the continuing unexpected high activity lends weight to the predictions of some solar scientists, who bucked the consensus of NOAA’s panel and continue to predict that the upcoming maximum will be strong, not weak.
It is too soon to say who will be right, but it is also clear that the consensus has no lock on correctness. In this sense, the solar cycle is giving us wonderful illustration of the uncertainty of science. Our knowledge is incomplete, so all predictions are untrustworthy and must be treated with great skepticism.
Readers!
Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. Your support allows me the freedom and ability to analyze objectively the ongoing renaissance in space, as well as the cultural changes -- for good or ill -- that are happening across America. Fourteen years ago I wrote that SLS and Orion were a bad ideas, a waste of money, would be years behind schedule, and better replaced by commercial private enterprise. Only now does it appear that Washington might finally recognize this reality.
In 2020 when the world panicked over COVID I wrote that the panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Only in the past year have some of our so-called experts in the health field have begun to recognize these facts.
Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.
You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are four ways of doing so:
1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.
2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
3. A Paypal Donation or subscription:
4. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652
You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.
This past weekend NOAA released its monthly update of its graph showing the Sun’s sunspot activity, with the new update covering the period through the end of June 2021. As I have done since I began this website eleven years ago, I post that monthly graph below, annotated to show the previous solar cycle predictions and thus provide context.
In June the hot streak of sunspot activity exceeding the prediction of NOAA’s solar science panel continued, with activity rising again after a tiny dip in May. Except for two months, since 2019 the number of sunspots each month has consistently exceeded the prediction. Furthermore, the ramp up of activity has been faster than expected.
The graph above has been modified to show the predictions of the solar science community for the previous solar maximum. The green curves show the community’s two original predictions from April 2007 for the previous maximum, with half the scientists predicting a very strong maximum and half predicting a weak one. The blue curve is their revised May 2009 prediction. The red curve is the new prediction, first posted by NOAA in April 2020.
Despite this hot streak, the difference so far between the prediction and the actual sunspot count is not very much. Should this pace of activity continue through maximum, the overall maximum, though higher than expected, will not be much higher than the previous solar maximum, which was one of the weakest in a century.
In other words, the Sun is still under-performing. Moreover, it is still too soon to say whether the prediction of NOAA’s panel, as indicated by the red curve, is wrong. It is not unusual for the monthly fluctuations to swing above and below such prediction curves. Given time, the overall curve could still match quite closely.
Nonetheless, the continuing unexpected high activity lends weight to the predictions of some solar scientists, who bucked the consensus of NOAA’s panel and continue to predict that the upcoming maximum will be strong, not weak.
It is too soon to say who will be right, but it is also clear that the consensus has no lock on correctness. In this sense, the solar cycle is giving us wonderful illustration of the uncertainty of science. Our knowledge is incomplete, so all predictions are untrustworthy and must be treated with great skepticism.
Readers!
Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. Your support allows me the freedom and ability to analyze objectively the ongoing renaissance in space, as well as the cultural changes -- for good or ill -- that are happening across America. Fourteen years ago I wrote that SLS and Orion were a bad ideas, a waste of money, would be years behind schedule, and better replaced by commercial private enterprise. Only now does it appear that Washington might finally recognize this reality.
In 2020 when the world panicked over COVID I wrote that the panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Only in the past year have some of our so-called experts in the health field have begun to recognize these facts.
Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.
You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are four ways of doing so:
1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.
2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
3. A Paypal Donation or subscription:
4. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652
You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.
Seems that the predicted curve fits actual if the time stamp is altered to the start of the cycle being earlier.
Phill O. noted “Seems that the predicted curve fits actual if the time stamp is altered to the start of the cycle being earlier.”
But, that’s not what happened.
bkivey
The predicted curve has the predicted time of start. If that is faulty, then it fits nicely!