Conscious Choice cover

From the press release: In this ground-breaking new history of early America, historian Robert Zimmerman not only exposes the lie behind The New York Times 1619 Project that falsely claims slavery is central to the history of the United States, he also provides profound lessons about the nature of human societies, lessons important for Americans today as well as for all future settlers on Mars and elsewhere in space.

 
Conscious Choice: The origins of slavery in America and why it matters today and for our future in outer space, is a riveting page-turning story that documents how slavery slowly became pervasive in the southern British colonies of North America, colonies founded by a people and culture that not only did not allow slavery but in every way were hostile to the practice.  
Conscious Choice does more however. In telling the tragic history of the Virginia colony and the rise of slavery there, Zimmerman lays out the proper path for creating healthy societies in places like the Moon and Mars.

 

“Zimmerman’s ground-breaking history provides every future generation the basic framework for establishing new societies on other worlds. We would be wise to heed what he says.” —Robert Zubrin, founder of founder of the Mars Society.

 

Available everywhere for $3.99 (before discount) at Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and all ebook vendors, or direct from the ebook publisher, ebookit. And if you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and I get a bigger cut much sooner.


The trial of the century.

The trial of the century.

Michael Mann doesn’t like people calling him a fraud for torturing and manipulating the climate data to create the false illusion that the climate is warming. And so, he is trying to shut down any criticism or analysis of his very poorly done science by using the power of government to enforce his will.

Two quotes from the article that are of interest:

Here is the point at which we need a little primer on libel laws, which hinge on the differentiation between facts and opinion. It is libel to maliciously fabricate facts about someone. (It is not libel to erroneously report a false fact, so long as you did so with good faith reason to believe that it was true, though you are required to issue a correction.) But you are free to give whatever evaluation of the facts you like, including a negative evaluation of another person’s ideas, thinking method, and character. It is legal for me, for example, to say that Michael Mann is a liar, if I don’t believe that his erroneous scientific conclusions are the product of honest error. It is also legal for me to say that he is a coward and a liar, for hiding behind libel laws in an attempt to suppress criticism.

These are all reasons that the lawsuit should have been summarily thrown out. It goes beyond the legitimate scope of libel and defamation laws and constitutes an attempt to suppress opinions that are considered politically correct.

And this:

In other words, Steyn’s evaluation of Mann’s scientific claims can be legally suppressed because Steyn dares to question the conclusions of established scientific institutions connected to the government. On this basis, the DC Superior Court arrives at the preposterous conclusion that it is a violation of Mann’s rights to “question his intellect and reasoning.” That’s an awfully nice prerogative to be granted by government: an exemption against any challenge to your reasoning.

I said before that I don’t know how the rest of us skeptics escaped being sued along with Steyn. Now we know. Mann is attempting to establish a precedent for climate censorship. If he wins this suit, then we’re all targets.

And global warming activists like Mann call me a “denier?”

Readers!
 

Please consider donating to Behind the Black, by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar below. Your support will allow me to continue covering science and culture as I have for the past twenty years, independent and free from any outside influence.


Your support is even more essential to me because I keep this site free from advertisements and do not participate in corrupt social media companies like Google, Twitter, and Facebook. I depend wholly on the direct support of my readers.


You can provide that support to Behind The Black with a contribution via Patreon or PayPal. To use Patreon, go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation. For PayPal click one of the following buttons:
 


 

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:


 

If Patreon or Paypal don't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
 

Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

6 comments

  • Cotour

    I guess you can expect a cease and desist letter from his lawyers?

  • Orion314

    FACISM REARS IT’S UGLY HEAD…..THIS IS A TREND WE CAN EXPECT UNTIL ANOTHER GENERAL BLACKJACK PERSHING SHOWS UP TO LEAD THE SLAVE REVOLT…FOR THOSE UNFAMILAR WITH THIS MAN FROM HISTORY, LOOK HIM UP, AND SEE HOW HE PUT DOWN THE MUSLIM UPRISING WHEN ALL OTHERS FAILED TO… IT MAKES FOR SOME INTERESTING READING.

  • Please, don’t write your comments all in caps. It is bad internet manners, as it makes it look like you are yelling at us.

  • Chris Kirkkendall

    This is truly scary – it really does take us back to a time when a totalitarian regime could not only dictate people’s actions, but even their thoughts & words as well.

    I particularly like this line:

    “If it is a sin to doubt, then there is no science”… that is SO true! Can you imagine it being illegal to challenge the belief that the Earth is flat ?? And things were that way at one time, but we should be way beyond that now…

    I literally pray to God this ridiculous suit gets tossed. I have to think it would be appealed if upheld, all the way to the USSC if necessary. As much as they sometimes issue some stupid rulings, I can’t imagine the Supremes would uphold something like this – in fact, I’d expect them to throw it out. But then, what do I know – I never would’ve guessed Chief Justice Roberts would rule in favor of ObamaCare…

  • Orion314

    Apologies for the caps, no shouting was intended. Here at work, and all typing must be in caps, probably to offset the shitty monitors we are forced to use ;)
    Cheers to all….

  • Jwing

    “Unless one has the proper credentials or greater pay grade, an ordinary citizen is not licensed to critique ANY government official’s actions, statements or writings while that official is preforming his duties. All such actions are punishable by no less than ten years in federal prison as all official federally funded government actions are protected and beyond reproach as the first amendment no longer applies.” CFR 2016 666:666:666

    Does this sound ridiculous now? Maybe so…but I fear Orwell was truly prophetic and the current young and naïve generation will have no difficulty swallowing this lie for the good of the planet or some such nonsense.

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *