Scientists issue new map of land below Antarctica’s icecap
Click for original image.
Using decades of data and more advanced computer software, scientists have now compiled the most detailed map of the land and shorelines hidden below Antarctica’s massive icecap.
The map to the right, reduced to post here, shows that bedrock terrain generally in hues of green to brown, with lower elevations comparable to the ocean in hues of blue. The actual shoreline is however impossible to determine, since without the pressure of the icecap on top, the continent would rise, while the ocean itself would also rise with the addition of all that water.
You can read the science paper here.. From the press release:
Known as Bedmap3, it incorporates more than six decades of survey data acquired by planes, satellites, ships and even dog-drawn sleds. … The map gives us a clear view of the white continent as if its 27 million cubic km of ice have been removed, revealing the hidden locations of the tallest mountains and the deepest canyons.
One notable revision to the map is the place understood to have the thickest overlying ice. Earlier surveys put this in the Astrolabe Basin, in Adélie Land. However, data reinterpretation reveals it is in an unnamed canyon at 76.052°S, 118.378°E in Wilkes Land. The ice here is 4,757 m thick, or more than 15 times the height of the Shard, the UK’s tallest skyscraper.
The paper describes at length the large uncertainties that exist in this data. As thorough as they tried to be, we must remember that Antarctica is very large with a very hostile environment. Much of it has never been visited by any humans. Getting an accurate picture of the thickness of the ice at all points is presently impossible. This is basically an excellent summary of our best guess.
Readers!
My annual February birthday fund-raising drive for Behind the Black is now over. Thank you to everyone who donated or subscribed. While not a record-setter, the donations were more than sufficient and slightly above average.
As I have said many times before, I can’t express what it means to me to get such support, especially as no one is required to pay anything to read my work. Thank you all again!
For those readers who like my work here at Behind the Black and haven't contributed so far, please consider donating or subscribing. My analysis of space, politics, and culture, taken from the perspective of an historian, is almost always on the money and ahead of the game. For example, in 2020 I correctly predicted that the COVID panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Every one of those 2020 conclusions has turned out right.
Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.
You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are four ways of doing so:
1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.
2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
3. A Paypal Donation or subscription:
4. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652
You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.
I see Atlantis, a UFO base, and a HUMONGOUS pot farm.
I think ecologists just have this idea is that it is just ice and rock—but it has everything other landscapes have.
I talked to someone who tried to tell me that Antarctica had no volcanoes–forgetting Mt. Erebus—home to the stuck robot Dante.
This will make Greens made:
https://phys.org/news/2025-03-equal-wealth-bad-climate-expert.html
The idea that democracy is good for the climate is often ideologically driven, but this is based on a faulty premise.
The Greens won’t like that one bit…look at this op-ed nonsense:
https://phys.org/news/2025-03-opinion-environmental-laws-national-energy.html
Now if you’ll excuse me—I have to help Blair with his mini-saucer…
Hey, where are the Mountains of Madness?!
Tekeli li
It’s uncharted, man!
“the ocean itself would also rise with the addition of all that water”
3% of the worlds water is fresh… Antarctica contains 2 1/2% of that three. (most of the rest is in Greenland)
I lack the math skills to figure out how much higher the ocean level would be if it received 3% more? The diameter of the earth times pi minus the landmass? It would be interesting to know… The current global warming model says about 100 feet?
Lake Vostock is the largest freshwater lake and a half a mile deep… I wonder where it is on the map?
It’s interesting to know that that Antarctica has one of the driest climates in the world, the polar vortex discourages any weather systems from climbing over 10,000 feet to cross the continent. And yet the 100 foot tall short wave antenna erected in the 60s at the South Pole only has 40 feet still above the ice. That’s about 1 foot of ice per year.
The only place that far in land the water could originate is from polar stratospheric clouds… Solar aurora borealis oxidizing into water. The more active the sun, the more new water the earth receives causing ocean levels to rise about 5 to 8 inches per century. (besides gasses full of hydrogen that oxidize into water, there’s new nitrogen and carbon dioxide added to our atmosphere! Don’t tell the carbon capture people, it will drive them nuts.)