Scroll down to read this post.

 

Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. I keep the website clean from pop-ups and annoying demands. Instead, I depend entirely on my readers to support me. Though this means I am sacrificing some income, it also means that I remain entirely independent from outside pressure. By depending solely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, no one can threaten me with censorship. You don't like what I write, you can simply go elsewhere.

 

You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are five ways of doing so:

 

1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.

 

2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
 

3. A Paypal Donation:

4. A Paypal subscription:


5. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above. And if you buy the books through the ebookit links, I get a larger cut and I get it sooner.


Astronomers determine that two super-Earths are not as rocky as previously believed

Using observations from both the Hubble Space Telescope and the now retired Spitzer infrared space telescope, astronomers now think that two super-Earth-sized explanets are not as rocky as previously believed, and are in fact liquid worlds with as much as half their make-up comprised of water. From the press release:

Water wasn’t directly detected at Kepler-138 c and d, but by comparing the sizes and masses of the planets to models, astronomers conclude that a significant fraction of their volume – up to half of it – should be made of materials that are lighter than rock but heavier than hydrogen or helium (which constitute the bulk of gas giant planets like Jupiter). The most common of these candidate materials is water.

“We previously thought that planets that were a bit larger than Earth were big balls of metal and rock, like scaled-up versions of Earth, and that’s why we called them super-Earths,” explained Björn Benneke, study co-author and professor of astrophysics at the University of Montreal. “However, we have now shown that these two planets, Kepler-138 c and d, are quite different in nature and that a big fraction of their entire volume is likely composed of water. It is the best evidence yet for water worlds, a type of planet that was theorized by astronomers to exist for a long time.”

With volumes more than three times that of Earth and masses twice as big, planets c and d have much lower densities than Earth. This is surprising because most of the planets just slightly bigger than Earth that have been studied in detail so far all seemed to be rocky worlds like ours. The closest comparison, say researchers, would be some of the icy moons in the outer solar system that are also largely composed of water surrounding a rocky core.

This data simply underlines a basic point: The information we have of all exoplanets is sparse, practically nil. Any conclusions about their make-up is an educated guess, at best. Even now the conclusion that these are water worlds should be treated with great skepticism.

Genesis cover

On Christmas Eve 1968 three Americans became the first humans to visit another world. What they did to celebrate was unexpected and profound, and will be remembered throughout all human history. Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8, Robert Zimmerman's classic history of humanity's first journey to another world, tells that story, and it is now available as both an ebook and an audiobook, both with a foreword by Valerie Anders and a new introduction by Robert Zimmerman.

 
The ebook is available everywhere for $5.99 (before discount) at amazon, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. If you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and the author gets a bigger cut much sooner.


The audiobook is also available at all these vendors, and is also free with a 30-day trial membership to Audible.
 

"Not simply about one mission, [Genesis] is also the history of America's quest for the moon... Zimmerman has done a masterful job of tying disparate events together into a solid account of one of America's greatest human triumphs."--San Antonio Express-News

8 comments

  • Doubting Thomas

    218 lightyears away. A 1/2 c generation ship could make it in about 100 years. A water world…..cool to explore.

    A guy can dream I guess.

  • David Ross

    Doubting Thomas: the further-out exoplanets which we can see (by transit) are good for guessing at exoplanets we can’t see, closer to us.
    Constraining their properties is good.
    Although I completely agree with RZ about us not knowing if these are water worlds. They could be enveloped in thick carbon-dioxide and some other sort of cloud, like Venus is; depending on how high the cloud deck. People used to think Cancri 55e was full carbon. We won’t know unless/until we catch a gas signature in the transit.

  • john hare

    Doubting Thomas. You reversed some numbers. 436 years at 0.5 c

  • Doubting Thomas

    John Hare – Oooopsss…thanks. Overcome by enthusiasm. Still excited.

    Thanks for the correction

  • Lee S

    Here’s a question for the more physics minded of you….
    If a probe to anywhere traveled at .5c , taking 400 years from our point of view, how long will it have traveled from the probes point of view?

  • There’s a handy chart here: https://www.fourmilab.ch/cship/timedial.html

    Curiously, at 0.5c, the observed difference between the frames of references are the same ratio as nautical miles, to Standard Imperial miles.

    It looks like you have to get deep into the nines (0.9999999 etc) to really notice the difference.

  • wayne

    Lee–
    definitely check out the link from Blair.
    Also check out the Lorentz Contraction page, for explanation of length-contraction.

    Blair-
    Great chart! Excellent website.
    I love this stuff, but I always have trouble visualizing exactly what is happening, this makes it easy….

  • Lee S

    Thanks Blair! ( And wayne!) , That chart is pretty eyebrow raising stuff!!
    It just makes more jam of my brain to see it all spread out like that…

    Someone, somewhere is having a good giggle at us mortals trying to work out the “why” behind all this!!

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *