More evidence of data tampering at NOAA


Please consider donating to Behind the Black, by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar to the right. Your support will allow me to continue covering science and culture as I have for the past twenty years, independent and free from any outside influence.

A close review of NOAA’s historic temperature data for New York shows that the agency appears to have been adjusting its records to cool past records or warm recent ones, without any explanation.

The author took a look at NOAA’s graph this year showing New York’s average January temperatures going back to 1890, and noticed that, according to that graph, 1943 was 0.9 degrees Fahrenheit warmer than 2014. Yet, a close look at the actual data from 1943 strongly suggested that 1943 was actually 2.7F warmer, not 0.9F. Somehow, NOAA had adjusted the numbers, either in 1943 or in 2014, to make the present warmer or the past colder. Further analysis, removing the one station that appears to have experienced the most heat island influence, thus distorting its long term record, suggested the adjustments might actually be worse.

These results, while certainly not covering all weather stations and years, are still consistent with every other close look at NOAA’s adjustments. Those adjustments always cool the past and warm the present, so as to provide confirmation of the theory of global warming. More important, there is never any explanation for those adjustments.

Of the seven sites, six have remained at the same locations, within a few yards. The station at Auburn has moved by a couple of miles, but is still in similar terrain.

There is no reason then why any major adjustments should have been required at any site.

Apologists for temperature tampering usually say it is all due to TOBS (Time of Observation). Yet the station at Ithaca, based at Cornell University, has used morning readings throughout. With a temperature difference of 2.9C, this is typical of the other sites, suggesting that any bias from TOBS is minor.

Either there is outright fraud going on here in the climate divisions at NOAA, or they are entirely blind to their own confirmation bias. Either way, this data once again illustrates why there is great distrust in their results. Global warming might be happening, and human activity might be causing it, but these strange adjustments in the data leave many in doubt.

Share

3 comments

  • Phill O

    More correctly put (IMO) is to say the data has been manipulated in order to support the green house gas theory. Unadjusted data matches the “Solar Powered Climate Change” (SPCC) model.

    Notice also that the AGW people have (are trying) to change it from the CO2 model, quite possibly, due to the CO2 model does not work.

  • Localfluff

    The climate sectarians, the true carriers of the truth about the Dooms Day, their Goddess here explain the horrors caused for women by this never before seen increase in global temperature(???)

    “- They look for food as they carry their fire wood when all of the grasses are gone while the crops burn up in the heat.” (Just making stuff up as I talk like a zombie who has never been in one of the ten poorest countries in the world and thus has no clue as to how people support themselves there.)
    /Hillary Clinton

    I’m so happy that she is NOT the president of the USA! Thank you all American voters. Thank you very much. And congratulations too! You won more than anyone else in the world. Could you imagine what a Hell hole the world would be without Donald Trump?
    blob:https://players.brightcove.net/a187ae68-f11b-4b82-8cd6-1d267a024ca3

  • Localfluff

    Try this link, for pukes by Hillary, so you don’t need to click it.
    https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-02-06/hillary-clinton-claims-climate-change-sexist

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *