A new comparison by scientists of polygon-shaped formations on both the Earth and Mars suggests that both were formed underwater, providing further evidence that Mars once had oceans.


Readers!
 
For many reasons, mostly political but partly ethical, I do not use Google, Facebook, Twitter. They practice corrupt business policies, while targeting conservative websites for censoring, facts repeatedly confirmed by news stories and by my sense that Facebook has taken action to prevent my readers from recommending Behind the Black to their friends.
 
Thus, I must have your direct support to keep this webpage alive. Not only does the money pay the bills, it gives me the freedom to speak honestly about science and culture, instead of being forced to write it as others demand.

 

Please consider donating by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar below.


 

Regular readers can support Behind The Black with a contribution via paypal:

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:


If Paypal doesn't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage. And if you buy the books through the ebookit links, I get a larger cut and I get it sooner.

A new comparison by scientists of polygon-shaped formations on both the Earth and Mars suggests that both were formed underwater, providing further evidence that Mars once had oceans.

Share

One comment

  • Phil Berardelli

    Back when I was covering planetary scientists I had several discussions about Martian geography/geology. I would comment about the fact that nearly half of the Red Planet’s surface is a low, flatland while the other half is high and mountainous — just as it would be if part of the planet was once covered by a great shallow sea. On every occasion, however, they cautioned me about jumping to that conclusion. Being only a curious journalist I had no hard data to refute or concur, but I couldn’t help thinking that someday that data would begin to emerge. Occam’s Razor has proven to be the eventual result many times before. I’m still betting on a once-oceanic planetary cousin.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *