To read this post please scroll down.

 

Readers! A November fund-raising drive!

 

It is unfortunately time for another November fund-raising campaign to support my work here at Behind the Black. I really dislike doing these, but 2025 is so far turning out to be a very poor year for donations and subscriptions, the worst since 2020. I very much need your support for this webpage to survive.

 

And I think I provide real value. Fifteen years ago I said SLS was garbage and should be cancelled. Almost a decade ago I said Orion was a lie and a bad idea. As early as 1998, long before almost anyone else, I predicted in my first book, Genesis: The Story of Apollo 8, that private enterprise and freedom would conquer the solar system, not government. Very early in the COVID panic and continuing throughout I noted that every policy put forth by the government (masks, social distancing, lockdowns, jab mandates) was wrong, misguided, and did more harm than good. In planetary science, while everyone else in the media still thinks Mars has no water, I have been reporting the real results from the orbiters now for more than five years, that Mars is in fact a planet largely covered with ice.

 

I could continue with numerous other examples. If you want to know what others will discover a decade hence, read what I write here at Behind the Black. And if you read my most recent book, Conscious Choice, you will find out what is going to happen in space in the next century.

 

 

This last claim might sound like hubris on my part, but I base it on my overall track record.

 

So please consider donating or subscribing to Behind the Black, either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. I could really use the support at this time. There are five ways of doing so:

 

1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.

 

2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation. Takes about a 10% cut.
 

3. A Paypal Donation or subscription, which takes about a 15% cut:

 

4. Donate by check. I get whatever you donate. Make the check payable to Robert Zimmerman and mail it to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.


Falcon Heavy prepped for static fire test

Capitalism in space: SpaceX has raised its first Falcon Heavy rocket onto the launchpad in preparation for the static fire test required before the rocket can do its first launch.

SpaceX’s first Falcon Heavy rocket has been raised vertical at pad 39A for the second time in advance of a planned hold-down test-firing of its main engines tomorrow during a window that extends from 1-7 pm EST (1800-0000 GMT). Kennedy Space Center employees were told to expect an estimated 15-second firing.

Genesis cover

On Christmas Eve 1968 three Americans became the first humans to visit another world. What they did to celebrate was unexpected and profound, and will be remembered throughout all human history. Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8, Robert Zimmerman's classic history of humanity's first journey to another world, tells that story, and it is now available as both an ebook and an audiobook, both with a foreword by Valerie Anders and a new introduction by Robert Zimmerman.

 

The print edition can be purchased at Amazon or from any other book seller. If you want an autographed copy the price is $60 for the hardback and $45 for the paperback, plus $8 shipping for each. Go here for purchasing details. The ebook is available everywhere for $5.99 (before discount) at amazon, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. If you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and the author gets a bigger cut much sooner.


The audiobook is also available at all these vendors, and is also free with a 30-day trial membership to Audible.
 

"Not simply about one mission, [Genesis] is also the history of America's quest for the moon... Zimmerman has done a masterful job of tying disparate events together into a solid account of one of America's greatest human triumphs."--San Antonio Express-News

7 comments

  • David Scott

    We were in Robinson Tx on January 4. Around 2-3 CDT and I’m pretty sure i heard a test fire off a space X engine. It lasted over a minute. At 20 miles the noise and vibration was very inpressive.

    We had driven thru McGregor on Hwy 84 about 30 mins earlier. Wish i had been delayed a bit.

  • mivenho

    Fifteen seconds! I wonder if the extra duration is to better analyze vibrational modes / stresses on the multi vehicle structure.

  • Jason Hillyer

    Is it true that if Falcon Heavy is going to explode, it will likely explode during the static fire test?

  • Jason Hillyer: No, the static fire test might work fine, but then during launch going through the atmosphere things might go south, especially when the rocket goes through Max Q, the period when the atmosphere is thickest and the rocket is under the greatest stress.

  • Edward

    Jason Hillyer,
    There is also low probability that something goes wrong during separation of the boosters, the launch up to that point will have some amount of tension and concern. After that, it should look like a regular launch. Except for two boosters landing back at Cape Canaveral Air Station and a third one landing on the drone ship Of Course I Still Love You. The video for all that action should be interesting. Or spectacular, if it does not go as planned.

    Using strap-on boosters is not new for rocketry, so SpaceX benefits from the experience of other rockets, but this is a new experience for SpaceX. Even if all goes well with this launch, they are likely to learn something.

  • Edward

    Robert,
    I knew that there were examples of rocket failure at Max Q, but I only just now looked for one. The unmanned test, Mercury Atlas 1 (MA-1) failed at Max Q:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury-Atlas_1
    “The Atlas rocket suffered a structural failure 58 seconds after launch. The vehicle at that time was at approximately an altitude of 30,000 feet (9.1 km) and 11,000 feet (3.4 km) down range when it was passing through Max Q and all telemetry signals suddenly ceased. Because the day was rainy and overcast with thick clouds, the booster had been out of sight from T+26 seconds and it was impossible to see what happened.”

    Your statement “Max Q, the period when the atmosphere is thickest” is a bit misleading. The density, or thickness, is less than at sea level, but the speed of the rocket is such that the atmospheric forces — dynamic forces — on the rocket are greatest. This is the reason for the obsession with Max Q.
    https://www.quora.com/Why-is-max-q-important-in-a-rocket-launch

    All,
    Rocket launch profiles are designed in order to keep the Max Q dynamic forces from overwhelming the structure of the rocket, and rocket structures are designed to survive the anticipated Max Q forces. This often means that liquid fuel engines (or hybrid engines) are throttled down to manage the speed, thus the forces, during this part of the launch. Launches (from the ground) start out straight upward in order to get into the thinner parts of the atmosphere quickly, but not so quickly that the dynamic forces become too large. There is also a need to turn downrange in order to begin developing the horizontal orbital speed, too. These are some of the factors that drive the trade offs in launch profile design.

    Falcon Heavy’s launch profile has the side boosters separate before the inner core first stage main engine cut off. Since the three rockets are (virtually) identical, this suggests that for some part of the launch the inner core does not produce as much thrust as the side boosters, because the core will likely burn more fuel, after booster separation, than the boost-back amount used by the side boosters.

  • Edward: You are right, my description of Max Q is not exactly accurate. I was writing quick, and looked for a short way to simplify the description. Always a mistake.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *