Scroll down to read this post.

 

Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. I keep the website clean from pop-ups and annoying demands. Instead, I depend entirely on my readers to support me. Though this means I am sacrificing some income, it also means that I remain entirely independent from outside pressure. By depending solely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, no one can threaten me with censorship. You don't like what I write, you can simply go elsewhere.

 

You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are five ways of doing so:

 

1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.

 

2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
 

3. A Paypal Donation:

4. A Paypal subscription:


5. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above. And if you buy the books through the ebookit links, I get a larger cut and I get it sooner.


Artemis lunar program likely to be delayed further

Surprise! According to two different news outlets today (Reuters and CNN) citing anonymous sources, NASA is about to announce further delays in its manned Artemis program to put humans back on the Moon.

Both reports state that the second Artemis mission, the first with humans on board, will not take place this year as NASA has been saying, but will be delayed until 2025. The third mission, the intended manned landing on the Moon, will be further delayed until 2026. Furthermore, Reuters reports that the actual landing might be delayed until the fourth mission, “giving SpaceX and other contractors more practice before making the first such landing in half a century.”

None of these dates will be met. I predict that further delays will be announced next year and the year after that, pushing all these missions back again, in small increments, even though it is obvious now that the entire program is years from making those first manned flights.

There are numerable problems. First the SLS rocket is so cumbersome it takes many months to assembly for launch. Any issues along the way cause delays. Second, battery problems were detected during testing of the Orion capsule to fly, requiring their replacement.

Third, and most important, the lunar landing requires NASA’s Lunar Gateway and SpaceX’s Starship. Gateway is nowhere near ready. All of its multiple components are still being built, with none yet launched.

SpaceX’s Starship is undergoing testing, but those test flights are being hampered by red tape at the FAA and elsewhere in the federal government. SpaceX had planned to do as many as six test flights per year. Right now the federal bureaucracy is slowing that plan to only one to two test flights per year. Under that restriction, the Starship lunar lander won’t be ready for years.

Pushing the manned lunar landing back one mission makes some sense, but the entire program remains fraught with great risks. Because SLS is so expensive and difficult to fly, NASA can’t afford to do the correct number of unmanned test missions before sending humans on it. For example, the first manned flight will be the first using the environmental system in Orion designed to keep people alive. Yet, that mission intends to circle the Moon with people on board.

For context, note that this program was first announced by George Bush Jr in 2004, with a goal of putting humans on the Moon by 2015. NASA did not even fly the first unmanned SLS/Orion mission until 2022.

Right now, if NASA gets a human on the Moon before 2030 it will be doing well.

Genesis cover

On Christmas Eve 1968 three Americans became the first humans to visit another world. What they did to celebrate was unexpected and profound, and will be remembered throughout all human history. Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8, Robert Zimmerman's classic history of humanity's first journey to another world, tells that story, and it is now available as both an ebook and an audiobook, both with a foreword by Valerie Anders and a new introduction by Robert Zimmerman.

 
The ebook is available everywhere for $5.99 (before discount) at amazon, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. If you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and the author gets a bigger cut much sooner.


The audiobook is also available at all these vendors, and is also free with a 30-day trial membership to Audible.
 

"Not simply about one mission, [Genesis] is also the history of America's quest for the moon... Zimmerman has done a masterful job of tying disparate events together into a solid account of one of America's greatest human triumphs."--San Antonio Express-News

6 comments

  • Dave Ataman

    Video from the Youtube channel “SmarterEveryDay”

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoJsPvmFixU

    Well worth the watch

  • Ray Van Dune

    If Trump is the next President, watch for Elon to come by and say “I’ve got a deal that will save you billions, and get us to the moon in record time!”

    “Remember how the Europa Clipper was supposed to launch on the SLS, and it just launched on Falcon Heavy? Well, we can do without SLS in other ways too! Here, hold my beer!”

  • Edward

    Dave Ataman wrote: “Well worth the watch
    Much of what Destin Sandlin says in that video and in his referenced SP-287 document, What Made Apollo A Success?, was already in practice in unmanned spacecraft development when I started in the business, four decades ago. Destin’s astonishment comes from the complications associated with the Gateway lunar space station.

    New in that video, however, was the reason for Gateway. (Hey! Look at that; I’m smarter today than I was yesterday.* Good work Destin.) SLS is underpowered for the task of recreating an Apollo lunar landing mission. It cannot get Orion into low lunar orbit. Thus, the wild orbit of Gateway, and the purpose of the lunar space station is to store a separately launched lander. SLS is more powerful than the Saturn V, but it has less capability during a Moon mission. Ugh. What a fiasco that thing is. One would think that NASA would learn better from Apollo, the Saturns, and all the other rockets made since.

    Oh, that’s right. NASA didn’t design SLS. Congress did. That pack of rocket scientists who think they are so smart just because thousands of supporters helped them get their jobs in Congress. Meanwhile, the rest of us are smart enough to get our jobs on our own.

    Ray Van Dune,
    I think everyone has been treading carefully not to upstage NASA, such as waiting for SLS to launch and take the lead in the most-powerful-launcher-ever competition before launching the even more powerful Starship. Can SpaceX upstage NASA with a manned lunar landing before Artemis does? Can the company land on Mars before NASA lands the first woman and the first person of color on the Moon? And why is putting specific demographics on the surface the only purpose for NASA’s mission to go back to the Moon? Shouldn’t NASA’s purpose continue to be exploration rather than demonstrate its wokeness?

    Sorry, Ray. I’m taking out some frustrations on you, and you deserve better. You need not answer these questions; just consider them as rhetorical ravings of a warped, frustrated, old man. (Where did I hear that phrase, recently?)
    __________________
    * Actually, I watched the video shortly after it came out, and I read the referenced SP-287 document right afterward. It is even easier to find now than it was then, with better looking versions. But I was smarter for having done both, so the timing is the only inaccuracy in my statement. Thanks, Dave, for the link.

  • Jeff Wright

    Raiz Space’ has a great video called “The Best Possible use of NASA’s SLS—SLS Wet Workshop.”

    Personally, I’d like to see work done whereby the SLS has a Saturn V-B thrust-ring arrangement with a central engine being an NTR.

    Stretch the tankage, and you go from stage and a have to orbit…to a stage and a half to BEO…in one shot.

    Popcorning foam no biggie now.

  • Ray Van Dune

    Well, NASA has delayed the landing until 2026., and the announcement included this little gem… “NASA said anomalies during the unmanned Artemis I test mission prompted the delays.”

    I haven’t heard any allusions to that before, but maybe I missed it. At the very least it is new to the general public.

  • Edward

    Ray Van Dune,
    There were a couple of anomalies on Orion during the test flight, but at the time NASA didn’t suggest that they were long pole items.

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *