Scroll down to read this post.

 

Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. I keep the website clean from pop-ups and annoying demands. Instead, I depend entirely on my readers to support me. Though this means I am sacrificing some income, it also means that I remain entirely independent from outside pressure. By depending solely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, no one can threaten me with censorship. You don't like what I write, you can simply go elsewhere.

 

You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are five ways of doing so:

 

1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.

 

2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
 

3. A Paypal Donation:

4. A Paypal subscription:


5. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above. And if you buy the books through the ebookit links, I get a larger cut and I get it sooner.


Federal law outlaws launches on foreign rockets

Killing competition: The American launch industry as well as the FAA regulators are in agreement that a 2005 law that limits American small satellite companies from using foreign launch companies should remain in place.

The CSLA, dating from 2005, is the U.S. government’s way of protecting the seemingly forever-nascent U.S. small-satellite launch industry from competing with government-controlled foreign launchers for U.S. business. It seeks to oblige non-U.S. rocket providers to sign a CSLA that, for all intents and purposes, sets U.S. commercial launch prices as the world minimum for government-owned non-U.S. launch providers.

The rationale is that these non-U.S. launchers, not bound by the constraints of profit and loss – but hungry for hard-currency export earnings – will undercut commercial U.S. companies’ launch prices and keep them from gaining market traction.

India’s launch rockets, for example, are designed and built by India’s space agency ISRO, and are backed not by private funds but by government money. The fear is that India could subsidize its rockets so that the price could always be kept below what any American company could charge.

The truth, however, is that competition and innovation, here in the U.S., has so successful undercut foreign prices that no amount of subsidies can hope to compete. Those foreign companies are now scrambling to actually redesign their rockets to lower their costs and thus their prices, rather than asking for more handouts from their governments. This law should be repealed.

Genesis cover

On Christmas Eve 1968 three Americans became the first humans to visit another world. What they did to celebrate was unexpected and profound, and will be remembered throughout all human history. Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8, Robert Zimmerman's classic history of humanity's first journey to another world, tells that story, and it is now available as both an ebook and an audiobook, both with a foreword by Valerie Anders and a new introduction by Robert Zimmerman.

 
The ebook is available everywhere for $5.99 (before discount) at amazon, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. If you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and the author gets a bigger cut much sooner.


The audiobook is also available at all these vendors, and is also free with a 30-day trial membership to Audible.
 

"Not simply about one mission, [Genesis] is also the history of America's quest for the moon... Zimmerman has done a masterful job of tying disparate events together into a solid account of one of America's greatest human triumphs."--San Antonio Express-News

2 comments

  • Dick Eagleson

    I read last month on Parabolic Arc that India is looking to privatize operation of the PSLV rocket, which has been used to launch a number of small satellites for U.S. firms. By the time the various U.S. government bureaucracies with even a small dog apiece in this fight are all heard from, the issue is likely to be moot anyway.

  • Edward

    Several (admittedly incoherent and contradictory) thoughts:

    1) Foreign nations may reciprocate with bans for launching smallsats on US rockets, limiting the payload supply and hampering the chances for success.

    2) The article says that when SpaceX dropped Falcon 1, it left a hole in the launch industry. However, if there had been adequate demand for the Falcon 1, SpaceX would have been foolish to drop a revenue rocket at a time when revenue was desperately needed. My take is that there were not many smallsat customers at the time, and I only see small lines, not large lines, of customers beating paths to the doors of the currently proposed smallsat launchers. Smallsat launchers are still counting on the (few) smallsat constellations to start their businesses.

    3) Subsidies or not, the big rockets would be tremendously inefficient at launching smallsats. I do not see any country spending the tremendous amount of money subsidizing their $100 million large rockets merely to launch smallsats that only require $1 million to $10 million rockets, because the customer cannot afford the high price of the expensive big rockets. It would be much less expensive for those countries to create their own small launchers, even if they were not privately operated.

    4) It may be a chicken and egg (Catch-22) problem. The smallsat boom may happen after the affordable launchers start launching, but there needs to be smallsats to launch.

    5) Foreign rocket companies could be hampered due to lack of customers, leaving only US companies to do the world’s smallsat launches. The majority of proposed smallsats are constellations of US satellites, so few foreign rocket companies may survive the initial years of start-up until the demand increases enough to keep them in business.

    6) Government competition killed private attempts to make launchers in the 1980s and again in the 1990s. Private companies could not find or keep capital funding in order to start launching their rockets, because the government controlled the industry — the control was so complete that the Space Act Agreement had to be passed in order to change the way government ordered rockets. It was not until COTS that government’s actions convinced some investors that private commercial companies might be able to succeed in the launch business. CRS and CCDev have convinced many investors that government is finally getting out of the way of commercial launch companies.

    7) Competition is a good thing. Even if the foreign smallsat launch startups were to win out over the initial US startups, then newer US startups would figure out better, cheaper, more efficient ways to beat the competition.

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *