To read this post please scroll down.

 

Readers!

 

My July fund-raising campaign to celebrate the fifteenth anniversary since I began Behind the Black is now over. I want to thank all those who so generously donated or subscribed, especially those who have become regular supporters. I can't do this without your help. I also find it increasingly hard to express how much your support means to me. God bless you all!

 

The donations during this year's campaign were sadly less than previous years, but for this I blame myself. I am tired of begging for money, and so I put up the campaign announcement at the start of the month but had no desire to update it weekly to encourage more donations, as I have done in past years. This lack of begging likely contributed to the drop in donations.

 

No matter. I am here, and here I intend to stay. If you like what I do and have not yet donated or subscribed, please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are four ways of doing so:

 

1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.

 

2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
 

3. A Paypal Donation or subscription:

 

4. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.


October 30, 2025 Quick space links

Courtesy of BtB’s stringer Jay. This post is also an open thread. I welcome my readers to post any comments or additional links relating to any space issues, even if unrelated to the links below.

Genesis cover

On Christmas Eve 1968 three Americans became the first humans to visit another world. What they did to celebrate was unexpected and profound, and will be remembered throughout all human history. Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8, Robert Zimmerman's classic history of humanity's first journey to another world, tells that story, and it is now available as both an ebook and an audiobook, both with a foreword by Valerie Anders and a new introduction by Robert Zimmerman.

 

The print edition can be purchased at Amazon or from any other book seller. If you want an autographed copy the price is $60 for the hardback and $45 for the paperback, plus $8 shipping for each. Go here for purchasing details. The ebook is available everywhere for $5.99 (before discount) at amazon, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. If you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and the author gets a bigger cut much sooner.


The audiobook is also available at all these vendors, and is also free with a 30-day trial membership to Audible.
 

"Not simply about one mission, [Genesis] is also the history of America's quest for the moon... Zimmerman has done a masterful job of tying disparate events together into a solid account of one of America's greatest human triumphs."--San Antonio Express-News

11 comments

  • Calvin Dodge

    How does one say “Roscosmos” in Chinese?

  • mkent

    Two other good pieces of news today:

    1) The Haven Demo has been confirmed to be scheduled for launch this Saturday night on the Bandwagon 4 mission.

    2) The second New Glenn is vertical on pad 36 at CCSFS in preparation for its launch of Escapade. Expect a static fire to occur shortly.

  • Jeff Wright

    To Calvin,

    The answer is “Dear occupant”

    Interesting find via magnetics
    https://phys.org/news/2025-10-strong-magnetic-field-duality-materials.html

  • mkent

    The New Glenn static fire was successful.

  • I posted this earlier today, but the original posting that it was in reply to has apparently been deleted. Presuming that “space” really is still the open topic, I’ll repost:

    Since the general topic is space, let’s talk about what we’ve been learning about Venus in particular and stagnant lid worlds in general. Of late, what we thought we knew about planet Venus has changed utterly.

    Venus is what happens—not, it turns out, when there’s a climatic “runaway greenhouse effect” as hitherto supposed—but rather when you’re a world lacking in plate tectonics, which therefore is subject to so-called lid tectonics.

    In Venus’ case, this transformed what could have been a semi-habitable world into the hellhole we see there today—not by means of any kind of a climatic catastrophe, but wholly geologic.

    Venus geologically is a so-called stagnant lid world. (Other local examples: the Moon, Mars, Mercury, Vesta.) Rather than plate tectonics (a.k.a. “mobile tectonics”), as Earth enjoys, Venus experiences lid tectonics, which means that Venus’ crust—rather than being cracked into “plates,” whose motion, subduction, volcanoes, et al., act to release a great deal of internal heat—instead forms a thick cap (a “lid”) atop the venusian interior, insulating it.

    For those who like to contemplate physics in operation, imagine what such an insulating layer lying atop its (heat-generating) interior does to a world.

    But no need to imagine, we now know (from its complete surficial dearth of old, large craters) that Venus around half a billion years back underwent a tremendous convulsion—due to heat buildup in the “stagnant” mantle below—whereby Venus’ entire crust one fine day basically turned over and melted (obviously a stupendous catastrophe), then refroze into the nearly pristine surface (a scattering of tiny craters have arrived since the cataclysm, allowing rough dating) that we see there now.

    The result is that any carbon hitherto resident in Venus’ crust—in calcite, limestone, coal, oil, or the bodies of any venusian inhabitants—would thereupon have been “cooked” and propelled into the atmosphere as CO2 gas. Thus, the situation we see on the planet today.

    Indeed, this kind of “resurfacing” event (sounds so sanitary, doesn’t it?) is a previously unimagined danger that stagnant-lid worlds, we now realize, are generally (or at least many of them) subject to: a disaster which can “suddenly,” with almost no warning—over geologic timescales (of perhaps 100 million years or less), that is—transform formerly clement worlds into almost literal hellholes.

    One might note that such disasters might occur repetitively to “lid” world(s) like Venus.

    #ScienceFiction and #SciFi has contemplated many kinds of planetary catastrophes—but it never imagined this.

  • Michael: I just realized that your comment was on the quick links that are scheduled for later today that were accidentally scheduled by me too early. I rescheduled them. Your original comment and my response will appear later today.

    Sorry about the confusion.

  • Jeff Wright

    Rumblings about a nine-engine New Glenn follow on….

    New Borman?
    https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=54391.msg2729627#msg2729627

    “New Borman is obviously the proper name for a 9 engine New Glenn. Beyond just being the first time Humans got further than LEO, Apollo 8 was the first times humans flew on a super heavy lift LV. So it seems an appropriate name for a vehicle that would be flirting with the definition of super heavy lift.”

    PBS on the future of Seetee (CT) ships
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eA4X9P98ess

  • Dick Eagleson

    SpaceX has added engines to Super Heavy and may do so again so why shouldn’t Blue do the same to New Glenn? Bring it on, say I. It would seem that pretty much everything Blue says it wants to do in space would benefit from such an upgrade – particularly its lunar logistics architecture. Perhaps the only reason New Glenn wasn’t nine-engined to start with was Bezos’s aversion to doing anything that looked too SpaceX-ish.

  • Jeff Wright

    This probably spells doom for New Armstrong, assuming it was ever serious. I hope I am wrong.

    I am not the only individual with a love of the past—Stoke looks to give new life to Bono’s plug nozzle.

    Bono had another concept—perhaps not serious (used to show how a typical rocket design is best).
    Still, his idea of a lenticular HLLV should get a fresh look:

    http://www.astronautix.com/b/bonosaucer.html

    Here is why the design is desirable:

    https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=50748.msg2729497#msg2729497

    Having a wide surface should lower wing loading.

  • “So it seems an appropriate name for a vehicle that would be flirting with the definition of super heavy lift.”

    Defining standards down.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *