Scroll down to read this post.

 

Genesis cover

On Christmas Eve 1968 three Americans became the first humans to visit another world. What they did to celebrate was unexpected and profound, and will be remembered throughout all human history. Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8, Robert Zimmerman's classic history of humanity's first journey to another world, tells that story, and it is now available as both an ebook and an audiobook, both with a foreword by Valerie Anders and a new introduction by Robert Zimmerman.

 

The print edition can be purchased at Amazon. from any other book seller, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. The ebook is available everywhere for $5.99 (before discount) at amazon, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. If you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and the author gets a bigger cut much sooner.


The audiobook is also available at all these vendors, and is also free with a 30-day trial membership to Audible.
 

"Not simply about one mission, [Genesis] is also the history of America's quest for the moon... Zimmerman has done a masterful job of tying disparate events together into a solid account of one of America's greatest human triumphs."--San Antonio Express-News


SpaceX launches 52 Starlink + 2 customer satellites

Capitalism in space: SpaceX today successfully launched another 52 Starlink satellites along with two smallsat satellites.

They have put just under 1,700 Starlink satellites into orbit. The first stage completed its 8th launch, and the fourth in 2021, according to the SpaceX announcer. Let me repeat that: That’s four launches of the first stage in less than five months. The fairing halves were also flying on their second flight.

The leaders in the 2021 launch race:

15 SpaceX
12 China
7 Russia
2 Rocket Lab

The U.S. now leads China 20 to 12 in the national rankings.

The support of my readers through the years has given me the freedom and ability to analyze objectively the ongoing renaissance in space, as well as the cultural changes -- for good or ill -- that are happening across America. Four years ago, just before the 2020 election I wrote that Joe Biden's mental health was suspect. Only in this year has the propaganda mainstream media decided to recognize that basic fact.

 

Fourteen years ago I wrote that SLS and Orion were a bad ideas, a waste of money, would be years behind schedule, and better replaced by commercial private enterprise. Even today NASA and Congress refuse to recognize this reality.

 

In 2020 when the world panicked over COVID I wrote that the panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Only in the past year have some of our so-called experts in the health field have begun to recognize these facts.

 

Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.

 

Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black.

 

You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are five ways of doing so:

 

1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.

 

2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
 

3. A Paypal Donation:

4. A Paypal subscription:


5. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above. And if you buy the books through the ebookit links, I get a larger cut and I get it sooner.

18 comments

  • mkent

    SpaceX today successfully launched another 52 Starlink satellites along with two smallsat satellites.

    Not yet. All of the satellites are still attached to the upper stage in a parking orbit.

  • Jay

    The Tyvak-0130 and a Capella Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) satellites are deployed.

  • Willi

    Best video EVER of first stage from separation to landing.

  • mkent

    Payload deployment is now confirmed. Successful mission.

    Best video EVER of first stage from separation to landing.

    That WAS pretty darn amazing.

  • eddie willers

    Best video EVER of first stage from separation to landing.

    Camera positioned so that we caught the drone ship the earliest I have seen.
    Boat. Target. Touchdown!

  • Good to hear … in related news, Glenn Reynolds (aka the Instapundit) is now up-and-running on Starlink from east Tennessee and reporting good results so far.

  • Patrick Underwood

    Yep, awesome video!

    But I’m still waiting to see one of those Navy thingamabobs zipping about near the ASDS. :)

  • Gary

    I figured this is the place to get an answer for my question of the day. I have a friend who is trying to convince me that NASA “gave” the Merlin engine to SpaceX. He doesn’t provide a lot of evidence for this. My research hasn’t turned up this gift. Do y’all have any idea what that “gave Merlin to NASA” could mean? Thanks.

  • Gary: Though rocket engines have been developed for the last seven decades both with and without NASA help, to say that NASA “gave” the Merlin engine to SpaceX exhibits not only a level of ignorance that is appalling, it is also sadly not surprising.

    SpaceX engineers used knowledge gained (some of it from direct experience) from the many engines built since the 1950s to design a new rocket engine that would provide the company what it wanted. It is thus SpaceX’s wholly.

    Moreover, NASA did not pay for that Merlin engine development. SpaceX developed it first using Elon Musk’s private capital. Once it was demonstrated to work the company was then able to win the big cargo and manned contracts from NASA that have since helped pay for its refinement and improvement (by SpaceX, not NASA).

    Your friend’s statement suggests he gets his information solely from NASA press releases, designed to make everyone believe that all space achievement comes from NASA solely. In truth NASA has accomplished remarkably little in almost a half century. Its planetary missions are usually built and run by JPL or APL, its big space telescopes run by SPSciI in Maryland, and its rockets and space station modules are built by private contractors hired by NASA. And in the past two decades only in the design of Orion and SLS has NASA contributed heavily, and that hasn’t gotten anyone very much.

  • Jeff Wright

    I would like SpaceX to do a best-of mash-up of the finest camera footage. This mission had the best landing as seen from Falcon…but you would show another mission’s drone ship footage and spice them together. Start with the explosions… then the best launch…fairing jettison.

    Then show Dragon…but explain it needs no fairing..a few best of shots. Then the upper stage. And the footage of it coming down as debris but explaining that it usually comes down over the ocean and that…with Starship…everything comes back,

  • @ Jeff Wright

    Should be enough material publically available to do what you are looking for. If not, contact SpaceX, they might go for it.

  • mkent

    I figured this is the place to get an answer for my question of the day. I have a friend who is trying to convince me that NASA “gave” the Merlin engine to SpaceX. He doesn’t provide a lot of evidence for this. My research hasn’t turned up this gift. Do y’all have any idea what that “gave Merlin to NASA” could mean? Thanks.

    The Merlin engine used on the Falcon 9 is a derivative of the Fastrac engine developed by NASA in the 1990s for use on the X-34. It’s a pretty major stretch to say that “NASA gave the Merlin engine to SpaceX.” That severely downplays the work that Tom Mueller and his propulsion team put in to create the Merlin engine. While the Merlin engine is derived from the Fastrac engine, it’s a significant departure from it and qualifies as a new engine. Tom Mueller and SpaceX deserve credit for this feat of 21st century engineering.

    For comparison, figure that Merlin is to Fastrac as the RS-68 is to the SSME.

    Your friend’s statement suggests he gets his information solely from NASA press releases, designed to make everyone believe that all space achievement comes from NASA solely.

    I don’t believe NASA ever put out a press release taking credit for the Merlin engine. Perhaps you could point me to one?

  • Jeff Wright

    X-34 was what the original Dream Chaser was going to be back in the Space Dev days as per Popular Science…

  • Patrick Underwood

    Gary, get Eric Berger’s book Liftoff! Besides being an awesome read, it has a whole chapter on how Tom Mueller developed the Merlin.

    Bottom line, NASA most certainly did not “give” SpaceX the Merlin.

  • Patrick Underwood

    Gary, according to the book, the only relationship between Merlin and NASA was the Fastrac turbo pump. NASA had (of course) cancelled Fastrac already. SpaceX had too much hassle with the pump mfr, Barber-Nichols, so they finally ended up developing their own.

    The original pump weighed 150 lbs and developed 3000 hp. The final Merlin pump weighed the same, but produced 12,000 hp.

  • Gary

    Thanks to all for the responses. I knew I couldn’t find anything that indicated NASA “gave” the Merlin to SpaceX, but I also know that the many curious minds on this site likely would have insight that I couldn’t match.

  • Jeff Wright

    Even though Starship SuperHeavy may make it obsolete-I want Falcon retired after it beats Delta’s records….if not R-7’s.

  • pzatchok

    I can not see Falcon being retired any time in the foreseeable future.

    It fits a nice economical launcher class.

    You wouldn’t hire a semi truck to take you across town to dinner so why would anyone want to hire the super heavy launcher just to get a Dragon capsule to the ISS or even the next space stations?
    Can you see a space station built inside the next 30 years that will hold 100 people or need a huge supply ship like the Super Heavy?

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *