Hubble looks at a nearby dwarf galaxy
Click for original image.
Cool image time! The photo to the right, cropped, reduced, and sharpened to post here, was taken by the Hubble Space Telescope as part of a continuing project to capture high resolution images of every nearby galaxy, which in this particular case the caption describes as follows:
UGCA 307 hangs against an irregular backdrop of distant galaxies in this image from the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope. The small galaxy consists of a diffuse band of stars containing red bubbles of gas that mark regions of recent star formation, and lies roughly 26 million light-years from Earth in the constellation Corvus. Appearing as just a small patch of stars, UGCA 307 is a diminutive dwarf galaxy without a defined structure — resembling nothing more than a hazy patch of passing cloud.
The red regions of star formation are significant, as they indicate that even in a tiny galaxy like this it is possible for there to be enough gas and dust to coalesce into new stars.
Astronomers living on a world inside this galaxy have an advantage over astronomers on Earth. There is no large galaxy like the Milky Way blocking their view of the cosmos in one direction. They can see it all, even in directions looking through UGCA 307.
Readers!
Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. Your support allows me the freedom and ability to analyze objectively the ongoing renaissance in space, as well as the cultural changes -- for good or ill -- that are happening across America. Fourteen years ago I wrote that SLS and Orion were a bad ideas, a waste of money, would be years behind schedule, and better replaced by commercial private enterprise. Only now does it appear that Washington might finally recognize this reality.
In 2020 when the world panicked over COVID I wrote that the panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Only in the past year have some of our so-called experts in the health field have begun to recognize these facts.
Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.
You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are four ways of doing so:
1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.
2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
3. A Paypal Donation or subscription:
4. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652
You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.
Click for original image.
Cool image time! The photo to the right, cropped, reduced, and sharpened to post here, was taken by the Hubble Space Telescope as part of a continuing project to capture high resolution images of every nearby galaxy, which in this particular case the caption describes as follows:
UGCA 307 hangs against an irregular backdrop of distant galaxies in this image from the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope. The small galaxy consists of a diffuse band of stars containing red bubbles of gas that mark regions of recent star formation, and lies roughly 26 million light-years from Earth in the constellation Corvus. Appearing as just a small patch of stars, UGCA 307 is a diminutive dwarf galaxy without a defined structure — resembling nothing more than a hazy patch of passing cloud.
The red regions of star formation are significant, as they indicate that even in a tiny galaxy like this it is possible for there to be enough gas and dust to coalesce into new stars.
Astronomers living on a world inside this galaxy have an advantage over astronomers on Earth. There is no large galaxy like the Milky Way blocking their view of the cosmos in one direction. They can see it all, even in directions looking through UGCA 307.
Readers!
Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. Your support allows me the freedom and ability to analyze objectively the ongoing renaissance in space, as well as the cultural changes -- for good or ill -- that are happening across America. Fourteen years ago I wrote that SLS and Orion were a bad ideas, a waste of money, would be years behind schedule, and better replaced by commercial private enterprise. Only now does it appear that Washington might finally recognize this reality.
In 2020 when the world panicked over COVID I wrote that the panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Only in the past year have some of our so-called experts in the health field have begun to recognize these facts.
Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.
You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are four ways of doing so:
1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.
2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
3. A Paypal Donation or subscription:
4. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652
You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.
Do galaxies shrink or expand over time?
And galaxies are not like the larger universe in that galaxies do not orbit around the center of the universe, correct?
But the direction a galaxy is moving is not radially from the center of the universe since Andromeda and the Milky Way are moving on a collision course. Kind of confusing.
Has Hubble seen any stars which are on their own, not orbiting a galaxy?
Steve Richter: Present theory about the evolution of galaxies is that they grow as they absorb smaller galaxies around them.
Steve Richter asked: “And galaxies are not like the larger universe in that galaxies do not orbit around the center of the universe, correct?”
Correct. The current model (which could change due to JWST observations) is that there is no center to the universe, which means that every point is the center of the universe. The next time you say that someone thinks that he is the center of the universe, keep this in mind; although he may be egotistical, he is right.
“But the direction a galaxy is moving is not radially from the center of the universe since Andromeda and the Milky Way are moving on a collision course. Kind of confusing.”
As the universe expands (again, current model), the clusters of galaxies tend to move apart. The galaxies within each cluster can move independently or even collide, and they tend to form a center of mass that they don’t drift too far from. If one were drifting too far, then it could be moving at a velocity beyond the escape velocity for that cluster, and that galaxy could end up on its own in the universe.
Some clusters could also be drifting closer together, but the model and the observations tell us that the farther apart the clusters are, the more likely that they are drifting apart.
The universe is a strange and mysterious place. We understand things that we experience on our own scale, and we call this understanding “classical physics” or sometimes Newtonian physics. Atoms and the particles that made up atoms behave differently, and we call these behaviors particle physics and quantum mechanics. We observe strange things that are hard to explain on the scale of galaxies and the scale of the universe, and that is called astrophysics. Dark matter and Dark energy are two things that astrophysicists have deduced to explain a couple of the observed mysteries.
In the past year, the James Webb telescope has returned data that contradicts the model of the universe that astrophysicists made over the past century, confounding them. There will undoubtedly be a decade or more of argument and bickering until the field is able to once again come to a general agreement. This is yet another example of how science is never settled, that everything we know to be right and true is wrong; it is just that we don’t know it, yet.
There was a time, a century ago, when we thought that light waves propagated through the ether (also: aether), like waves on a lake. Ether was something that physicists deduced to explain the wave-like behavior of light. The concept of ether went away when quantum mechanics showed us how light waves can propagate without a medium, sort of like those waves on the lake but without the water. As I said, a strange and mysterious place.
The Mechanical Universe
Ep 41: The Michelson Morley Experiment
https://youtu.be/Ip_jdcA8fcw
29:02
Wayne good stuff. You probably just cost me a lot of time with that caltec series. Old school college lecture, thick glasses, professor in nerdy business dress, chalkboard, wow, cheezy but effective cartoonish illustrations, just wow. The history and personification of the experiment was well done. I do not want my 29 minutes back.
I never knew the Lorentz transformations came from explaining Michelson Morley. I thought I remembered from collage the Lorentz transformation were derived from Relativity. I knew Einstein claimed not to know of Michelson Morley, and caltec covered that like a cliffhanger. I always suspected Einstein had to have known.
“… The current model (which could change due to JWST observations) is that there is no center to the universe, which means that every point is the center of the universe. …”
There being no center of the universe would explain why the background radiation is still detectable on Earth. Common sense says the radiation should be gone like a blast wave of an explosion that emanates from ground zero.
Without a universe center doesn’t that mean galaxy clusters are moving in random directions, independent of each other? But Edwin Hubble saw the distant galaxies moving away from us. Are there galaxy clusters moving in the opposite direction of our local group galaxy cluster, on a collision course with the local group?
“Without a universe center doesn’t that mean galaxy clusters are moving in random directions, independent of each other? But Edwin Hubble saw the distant galaxies moving away from us. Are there galaxy clusters moving in the opposite direction of our local group galaxy cluster, on a collision course with the local group?”
Not really. The expansion of the universe means that everything is moving with the expansion and generally getting farther and farther away from us and everything else (even the ether and the dark matter, although the hypothesis is that the universe is expanding into a supply of dark energy, and the gain of all that energy provides the power to cause the observed increasing expansion rate).
The theory was developed because farther galaxies appeared to be receding away from us, the farther the faster, and it someone were to run in reverse a film of all this motion, then the film would show everything getting closer and closer until it all became one tiny blob of energy. The tiny blob would be the entire universe, which would be an inch in diameter, not many, many light years in diameter.
The generally accepted model of the universe is based upon the universe beginning as a tiny blob of enormous energy, suddenly expanding in a Big Bang, and all of space, time, mass, laws of physics, morals, ethics, and fattening foods were carried along with it as it expanded. Eventually, all that energy condensed into the matter that we see around us, and the microwave background radiation continues to exist Everywhere All at Once, if I may use a truncated movie title for effect.
Not only is each point in the universe the center of the uncentered universe, it is also where the universe began as a small ball.
Other models have been tried, including one in which the Earth was on the back of a large tortoise, which was resting on another tortoise, which was resting on another tortoise, which was tortoises all the way down. Feel free to choose your favorite model, because the Big Bang Theory is being questioned almost as much as the model with tortoises all the way down. I’m sticking with the Big Bang Theory, but only because I get to be the center of the universe and the source of the universe, which revolves (or expands) around me, and everyone is required to acknowledge that undeniable fact.
John–
All the “Mechanical Universe” lectures are available on YT.
Highly recommend them for home-schooling, or just plain old good times.
(and while I’m at it– highly recommend the multiple David Butler series for home-schooling– these were made for educational purposes (HS level), and they have classroom aids. )
Now, if you want hours of intense Math, I suggest the Leonard Susskind lectures.
–>
“All Leonard Susskind Stanford lectures, in order”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyX8kQ-JzHI&list=PL6i60qoDQhQGaGbbg-4aSwXJvxOqO6o5e
Steve–
It helps to think of all this as…..We are inside an expanding sphere of Space. The ‘big bang’ was not an explosion per se and can be best thought of as a moment in Time and not a physical location in Space.
Sturgill Simpson –
“Turtles All The Way Down” (2014)
https://youtu.be/6gBV-Nzq7Pg
3:05
(Psychedelic Country…)
Sean Carroll
The Biggest Ideas in the Universe
#22: Cosmology
https://youtu.be/tZQadPmTd84
1:59:14
(and there is a 90 minute Q&A follow up available.)
Hubble’s operating again? and Dwarf Galaxy with teeny tiny planets inhabited by Teeny Tiny Animals and People
Speaking of Edwin Hubble, as well as dwarf galaxies, not to speak of how we know that there are other galaxies, way back in 1925 (98 years ago), Hubble observed the following in a paper in Astrophysical Journal: [quoting…]
The present investigation [using Cepheid variables for the first time as an indicator of distances beyond the Magellanic clouds] identifies NGC 6822 as an isolated system of stars and nebulae of the same type as the Magellanic clouds, although somewhat smaller and much more distant. A consistent structure is thus reared on the foundation of the Cepheid criterion, in which the dimensions, luminosities, and densities, both of the system [NGC 6822] as a whole and its separate members, are of orders of magnitude which are thoroughly familiar. The distance is the only quantity of a new order. The principle of the uniformity of nature thus seems to rule undisturbed in this remote region of space.
[/unQuote]
____
(Edwin P. Hubble, “NGC 6822, a remote stellar system,” Astrophys. J. 62 (1925), 409-433.)