Scroll down to read this post.

 

Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. I keep the website clean from pop-ups and annoying demands. Instead, I depend entirely on my readers to support me. Though this means I am sacrificing some income, it also means that I remain entirely independent from outside pressure. By depending solely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, no one can threaten me with censorship. You don't like what I write, you can simply go elsewhere.

 

You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are five ways of doing so:

 

1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.

 

2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
 

3. A Paypal Donation:

4. A Paypal subscription:


5. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above. And if you buy the books through the ebookit links, I get a larger cut and I get it sooner.


Spinlaunch wins suborbital launch contract from NASA

Spinlaunch prototype suborbital launcher

Capitalism in space: Spinlaunch has won a launch contract from NASA to use its rocket-tossing spin launcher, shown in the photo to the right, to place a test payload on a suborbital flight later this year.

Unlike a vertical rocket first stage, the launcher spins its upper stage to a high acceleration and flings it upward. While the G-forces are too brutal for any delicate equipment or biology, this technique could be a very cheap way to toss bulk payloads like water and oxygen into space.

Spinlaunch has already done one test flight in November ’21, and hopes to do its first orbital test flight by ’25.

Genesis cover

On Christmas Eve 1968 three Americans became the first humans to visit another world. What they did to celebrate was unexpected and profound, and will be remembered throughout all human history. Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8, Robert Zimmerman's classic history of humanity's first journey to another world, tells that story, and it is now available as both an ebook and an audiobook, both with a foreword by Valerie Anders and a new introduction by Robert Zimmerman.

 
The ebook is available everywhere for $5.99 (before discount) at amazon, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. If you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and the author gets a bigger cut much sooner.


The audiobook is also available at all these vendors, and is also free with a 30-day trial membership to Audible.
 

"Not simply about one mission, [Genesis] is also the history of America's quest for the moon... Zimmerman has done a masterful job of tying disparate events together into a solid account of one of America's greatest human triumphs."--San Antonio Express-News

8 comments

  • Col Beausabre

    In terms of non-rocket launchers

    1) Bob Heinlein’s idea in the Fifties, if memory serves, was a electromagnetic railgun, to launch cargos of raw materials (and eventually “rods from God”) in “The Moon is Harsh Mistress”

    2) Gerald Bull took Jules Verne’s “from the Earth to the Moon” (as modified by Professor Rausenberger and Krupp) to heart with Project HARP back in the Sixties

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_bombardment

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_HARP

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paris_Gun

    I’ve always wished HARP had been a success

  • John hare

    One suspects that few people have worked the actual numbers on the scheme.

  • Cotour

    Zman, comments?

    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/04/pentagon-declassifies-1500-pages-ufo-reports-claim-ufo-encounters-cause-nervous-system-damage-unaccounted-pregnancies/

    “The documents also reported encounters with “ghosts, yetis, spirits, elves and other mythical/legendary entities” classed as “AN3” and witnessing a UFO with aliens on board would be “CE3”.

    Poltergeists, crop circles, spontaneous human combustion, alien abductions, and other paranormal events are also categorized, The Sun reported.”

    Information? Disinformation?

  • sippin_bourbon

    From what I have read about magnetic accelerators or mass accelerators is that they would work great on the Moon (as in The Moon is a Harsh Mistress), but not as well on Earth. The main reason is the lack of air pressure to over come on the moon.

    Spin Launch supposedly lowers the pressure in the spin chamber to overcome this. I have read some on this, but it seems like they still have a lot to overcome.

    To say that it cannot launch delicate objects is an understatement. The instant transition when let go that changes the forces on the cargo almost limit it to solids only.

  • Ray Van Dune

    I am puzzled about how the spin launcher handles the balancing of the launch arm. The asymmetric force must be very high either before the launch, or after the launch, unless a compensating mass is also released from the other end of the arm at the moment of payload release.

    Or is the problem solved by the use of a really big freaking bearing?

  • Cotour

    “Maybe they are among us? I don’t know.”

    https://youtu.be/5WuGolAXZVg

  • Andi

    If they evacuate the spin chamber for the launch, there must be one heck of a re-entry when the projectile slams into the normal atmosphere outside the chamber.

  • There’s a Youtube video about their test launch that explains the air-pressure issue. I don’t recall the balance issue being addressed, but it is a very good point. To get up to speed, a counter-weight would be handy, but after launch!? I thought my washer rocked in the spin cycle.

    For an Earth-based rail gun, you want the open end to be really high. Up the side of a tall mountain would be helpful. Up the side of a tall mountain onto a long same-grade track would be even better(*). Most of the depressurization would take care of itself by closing the hatch at the bottom while leaving the top open. Close the top hatch and pump it down; that sounds really expensive. But, The Boring Company wants to use evacuated tunnels, so it must be at least vaguely feasible.

    (*) Active support would probably work. If one is rail-gunning tons of cargo up to speed, a few megawatts to hold up the end of the tube is probably acceptable. Perhaps some sort of giant dirigible as a backup system so it doesn’t just fall out of the sky if the power goes out.

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *